Who Owns The Root?
Categories:
2 responses to “Who Owns The Root?”
-
Disclaimer: I’m American. Don’t hold that against me.That said, I was under the impression that IPv6 included provisions for distributing the governance of the root servers. I can’t recall a source, however, so I may be wrong.Secondly, do you still see there being a single entity that governs these root servers? I’d be concerned if it were really distributed that there was no single root node in a tree, or that naming conflicts could arise between branches of the tree. Having a single entity helps ensure that names are only registered once, for example.Third, are other country domains (.uk, .de, et cetera) under the purview of these root servers, or a different infrastructure?Anyway, my thoughts so far. At least this isn’t in the hands of a corporate entity.
-
Mike, I don’t know the details about IPv6, so I can’t comment as to whether governance can be distributed – but remember I’m talking about political governance, not the technical governance, or the service governance – which are different things. Actually, I’d be surprised if IPv6 specs even mention political governance – it the latter forms that it’s more likely to cover.Second, I agree that there should be a single root for the reasons that you mention – but again, I’m talking about political governance – that could be invested in a single governing body, whose members consituted representatives from multiple government. That sounds like the UN to me, or maybe ISO…The other country domains are indeed under the purview of the root servers, which are currently totally controlled by the US. That’s the issue.

Leave a comment