Reflections on life at “De Witte Wand”…

Category: Society

  • City Life

    When I was young, I loved living in cities; the ten years I spent living in London in the 1970s gave me a great buzz. But now, I crave the quiet life. Visiting cities these days makes me feel like a country mouse wanting to scurry back to the open fields, the quiet woods, and the fresh air at the earliest opportunity. Then again, the megacities of today are utterly different from the London I knew thirty years ago.

    It’s also the case that at some point this year, the human race will pass some sort of threshold – for the first time in its history, there will be more people living in cities than not. I find that quite staggering – up along with the statistic that, since I was born, the world’s population has almost trebled from 2.5 billion in 1950 to 6.7 billion last month.

    I’m reminded of this by reading an article in today’s Observer. Deyan Sudjic writes about the current state of the city, and speculates about its future. As well as some positive data points, it also has some sobering passages:

    Cities bring out a lurking paranoia in some people. They see this explosive growth as a tide of slums engulfing the world. Certainly there is plenty to be worried about.

    Half of the 12 million people in Mumbai live in illegal shacks, 200,000 of them on the pavement. Every day, at least two people are killed falling off overcrowded suburban trains. In Mexico City, fewer than four workers in 10 have formal jobs, public transport is largely in the form of mafia-controlled minibuses, and taxis. The last mayor’s response was to build a second tier on the elevated motorway, to allow the rich to speed up their commuting time.

    Johannesburg, with its horrifying levels of violent crime, has seen the affluent quit the city centre for fortified enclaves on its boundaries. As a result, South Africa is leading the world in developing new security techniques for gated housing, built appropriately enough in the style of Tuscan hill towns. Private security is also a divisive a topic in north London where I live where the clatter of police helicopters has become routine. My neighbourhood divides between those who want to install barriers and gates to cut us off from the world outside and those who see such measures as the ultimate negation of what life in a city should be. Despite our anxieties, London is a safe city by world standards. The murder rate is 2.1 for every 100,000 inhabitants. In Johannesburg, it is nine times that figure and you are eight times as likely to be killed in a car crash there. 

    Of course, the article is also a puff-piece for the book that he co-edited being published next week: The Endless City. I’m definitely tempted to get it; perhaps it might shine a few rays of hope on my current feelings about city life. They seem to be closer to the views expressed by Mike Davis in his Planet of Slums.

  • Medhi Kazemi

    There’s a case currently rumbling through the Dutch legal system, and which is likely to reach the UK.
     
    An Iranian, Medhi Kazemi, currently being held in a Dutch Detention centre in Rotterdam, may be released for extradition to the UK. There, he will likely be returned to Iran. The most likely prognosis from that point forward is that he will be executed, by hanging, for being homosexual.
     
    Pontius Pilate, thy spirit lives on.
  • The Atheist’s Creed

    PZ Myers responded to a particularly stupid portrayal of an atheist by an artist with something that summed up my attitude to life perfectly. I give you:
     
    The Atheist’s Creed:
    I believe in time,
    matter, and energy,
    which make up the whole of the world.
     
    I believe in reason,
    evidence and the human mind,
    the only tools we have;
    they are the product of natural forces
    in a majestic but impersonal universe,
    grander and richer than we can imagine,
    a source of endless opportunities for discovery.
     
    I believe in the power of doubt;
    I do not seek out reassurances,
    but embrace the question,
    and strive to challenge my own beliefs.
     
    I accept human mortality.
    We have but one life,
    brief and full of struggle,
    leavened with love and community,
    learning and exploration,
    beauty and the creation of new life,
    new art, and new ideas.
     
    I rejoice in this life that I have,
    and in the grandeur of a world that preceded me,
    and an earth that will abide without me.  
    Damn, I think I may even have this read out at my funeral.
     
    Addendum: One of the comments on PZ’s piece quotes a statement from Madalyn Murray O’Hair, which I think is also of value:
    An Atheist loves himself and his fellow man instead of a god.
    An Atheist thinks that heaven is something for which we should work for now – here on earth- for all men together to enjoy.
    An Atheist accepts that he can get no help through prayer but that he must find in himself the inner conviction and strength to meet life, to grapple with it, subdue and enjoy it.
    An Atheist thinks that only in knowledge of himself and a knowledge of his fellow man can he find the understanding that will help to a life of fulfillment.
     
    Therefore, he seeks to know himself and his fellow man rather than to ‘know’ a god.
    An Atheist knows that a hospital should be built instead of a church.
    An Atheist knows that a deed must be done instead of a prayer said.
    An Atheist strives for involvement in life and not escape into death.
     
    He wants disease conquered, poverty vanquished, war eliminated. He wants man to understand and love man. He wants an ethical way of life. He knows that we cannot rely on a god nor channel action into prayer nor hope for an end of troubles in a hereafter. He knows that we are our brothers’ keepers in that we are, first, keepers of our lives; that we are responsible persons, that the job is here and the time is now."  
    What I find depressing is what happened to Madalyn Murray O’Hair. We humans are a species in need of much improvement. But the bottom line is that it is down to us, not to any mythical and supernatural god, to do it.
    The job is here and the time is now.
    Never was a truer sentence spoken.
  • Obfuscating Archbishops

    I see Ophelia is raising an eyebrow here and here at the fact that Archbishops Williams and Sentamu seem to be changing their minds about not resisting the repeal of the UK’s blasphemy laws. I can’t say I blame her. Their letter to Hazel Blears indeed makes interesting reading. Just for fun, I also measured its readability, by using the Flesch Reading Ease index. It scores 36.8. Roughly speaking, on the Flesch Reading Ease scale, 0 is completely incomprehensible and 100 is perfectly readable. So with a score of 36.8, they could try a little harder to make their point clearer. Mind you, this is far better than Archbishop Williams previous effort. I found that his "Sharia" speech to the Royal Courts of Justice scored a miserable 19.2. No wonder he complained about being misunderstood. 
  • Clash of Ideologies

    Here’s a perfect example of far apart our perceptions of the world can get. Trouble is, I can’t quite decide who to side with. On balance though, I think I come down on the side of Mr. Eugenides. Mr. Boyle is either a saint or a fool, and, lord knows, there is often not enough space betwixt the two to insert a cigarette paper.
  • Autistic Pride

    I’ve got a confession to make; when I heard about the YouTube video "In My Language" last year, I watched about two minutes of it, before I stopped, thinking to myself "why do I want to see any more of this autistic woman humming to herself and making noises with objects?"
     
       
     
    Well, more fool me. Today, I went back to it and watched it to the end. And I have to say, it’s remarkable. I was prompted to return by this article in Wired, which opens with a portrait of Amanda Baggs (the young woman in the video). The article is definitely worth reading, and you really should see the video, if you haven’t already done so.
     
    Update: Amanda Baggs makes a few clarifications on the Wired article over at her blog.
  • Hidden Lives

    Honor Moore writes about her father, Bishop Moore. A bittersweet tale.
  • The Value of Evidence

    Professor Alan Sokal has an interesting piece in the Guardian’s Comment is Free section today: "Taking Evidence Seriously. He is perhaps best known for his joke on Post-modernism: "Transgressing the Boundaries: Toward a Transformative Hermeneutics of Quantum Gravity". I only wish that the good professor were joking when he writes here on the propensity of people, and politicians in particular, to give credence to irrationalism. Alas, he’s not, and quite right too.
     
    Update: Norm Geras makes an excellent point over at his blog: a secular State is not the same as an atheistic State. Prof. Sokal appears to conflate the two, and Norm is quite right to point out this obfuscation.
  • Damn

    One of the blogs I try and make a point of reading regularly is Tom Reynolds’ Random Acts of Reality. Consequences is a fairly typical entry. Just when you think the story is bad enough, he delivers a real kicker in the last line. Damn.
  • Strawman Alert

    Andrew Brown reaches a new low in his opinion piece in today’s Guardian. I really am getting awfully tired of the falsehoods that he and people like him (Theo Hobson springs to mind) trot out whenever they mention the name of Richard Dawkins.
  • There’s Nowt So Queer As Folk…

    And here’s the next installment of an occasional series. This time, a tip of the hat goes to Jim Downey for drawing our attention to people who trepan for fun. Warning, if you follow his links to the diary entries, you’ll get the full works – amateur operating theatres, blood, and clear contenders for the Darwin Awards.
  • Who Are The Fire Starters?

    David Thompson asks this question over at his blog. A valid point, I feel. It would appear that some folks think that Mo should not be castigated for wanting to find his cigarette lighter. But hang on, who is starting these fires?
  • Despairing

    Damian Thompson is in a somewhat despairing mood at the moment. Can’t say I blame him.
  • The Apocalypse Bus Tour

    The Beeb’s been showing a series of quirky documentaries, each highlighting a slightly off-beat look at people: the Wonderland series. They’ve all been rather good, but last night’s episode: The End of the World Bus Tour was a particularly fine example. The documentary crew joined a group of nearly 50 Christian fundamentalists who were touring the Holy Land in a coach, clearly relishing the forthcoming apocalypse, and the fact that they would be whisked off to heaven by the Rapture. There’s a good review of the programme here.
     
    The filmmakers did not sneer at these deluded folk, but let them speak for themselves. And indeed, it was easy to feel compassion for some of them, who had clearly been damaged by life’s vicissitudes, and who had turned to a simple faith to bear them up. Not all of them though. I won’t readily forget the dead-eyed Hannah, a teenage student who seemed to take some pleasure in avowing to the film director that "we are all born evil", and that while she would be going to heaven, "you will burn in hell for all eternity". Hannah is apparently taking a number of courses of study, including photography, textile design and, astoundingly, critical thinking. The irony is, I feel sure, totally lost on her.
  • Tatchell on Qaradawi

    Peter Tatchell has an excellent opinion piece on the UK government’s decision to ban Muslim extremist cleric Yusuf al-Qaradawi from entering Britain. Tatchell sees it as "illiberal, unwarranted and unmerciful". I agree. We also both agree that Qaradawi is an intolerant hypocrite, but what better way to show up his true nature than to allow him to enter Britain for needed medical treatment? As Tatchell says,
    "Let’s hope his surgeon is a gay Israeli Jew – and that he performs a successful operation, so that Qaradawi is forced to acknowledge that he owes his life to a Jewish sodomite".
  • Open Mouth…

    …Change feet. It appears as though Dr. Williams is on a roll at the moment. I hope he comes to his senses soon.
     
    Update: I think Andrew Brown’s comment in The Guardian pretty much nails it:
    "Only if Islamic law can be reduced to a game played between consenting adults can it be acceptably enforced in this country; and that’s not, I think, how it is understood by its practitioners." 
    Update 2: Yasmin Alibhai-Brown also has her doubts: What he wishes on us is an abomination. I can’t help but feel that she’s right.
  • Space Psychiatry

    Vaughan, over at Mind Hacks, has an interesting piece on space psychiatry. The topic dates back to 1959, when a special issue of the American Journal of Psychiatry was devoted to it. Given the time, it was not surprising that one article:
    …discusses the possibilities of using psychological selection techniques for space crew and notes that it should exclude "the person with a history of constantly fighting and rebelling both against peers and authority figures, as well as those with pressing homosexual or other major neurotic conflicts."
    Thankfully, times change. Go and read the piece. It contains references to Stanislaw Lem (a favourite author of mine) and to another related piece in Wired.
  • Offended?

    I see that the UK’s Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) has banned an advert produced by a Christian group, The Christian Congress for Traditional Values (CCTV). The advert shows a photo of a traditional family – man, woman and two children, with the slogan: "Gay aim: abolish the family".
     
    The ASA said that the advert broke advertising rules on social responsibility, decency, matters of opinion and truthfulness, adding that "We concluded that the poster was likely to cause serious or widespread offence and might lead to anti-social behaviour." Oh dear, I’m not sure I want to be lumped in with the ever-growing group of people who take offense at the slightest thing. Frankly, the advert is pathetic, and a clear reflection of the stupidness of the organisation that produced it, but I don’t feel offended by it. I am more struck by the time-warped attitudes of the people who produced it. Clearly a bunch of god-bothering wankers.
     
    I note that the group "defended the poster, citing gay organisations’ manifesto documents from the 1970s which described the traditional family unit as working against homosexuality." From the 1970s?! Clearly they are stuck in a time warp. They are getting exercised over the old Gay Liberation Front manifesto produced in 1971, which was indeed a child of its time. But we’ve all grown up since then – or at least, some of us have. Earth to the CCTV: families come in all shapes and sizes. Get over it.
  • Count Your Blessings

    As I’ve said before, I feel very fortunate to be able to live in a society where I don’t have to live in fear because of who I am. Others are not so lucky. GayUganda has two posts up about a situation that is developing in Senegal. Read his first post, At Home, and then his second. Depressing.
     
    Update: 7 Feb 2008: the BBC reports that the Sengalese men have been freed. I hope that this is good news, but I also note the last sentence of the Beeb’s report:
    Senegal is a predominantly Muslim country and gay men and women remain socially marginalised. 
    Not good.
  • I’m Sorry, I’ll Read That Again

    Sometimes, I feel that I agree with some of the observations that Rowan Williams makes. But sometimes, I wonder whose side he is on. Cue this speech. And Ophelia, as usual, points out the poison in the guts.