If a biological basis is found, and if a prenatal test is then developed, and if a successful treatment to reverse the sexual orientation to heterosexual is ever developed, we would support its use as we should unapologetically support the use of any appropriate means to avoid sexual temptation and the inevitable effects of sin.
Is Your Baby Gay?
Categories:
6 responses to “Is Your Baby Gay?”
-
‘…any appropriate means to avoid sexual temptation and the inevitable effects of sin.’
Shit! He’s going to castrate the whole population?? What an absurd mindset to suggest its only going to apply to the pink babies. What a …… wanker basically. -
And why only baby boys? Don’t lesbians sin too? Why am I bothering to even consider this?
-
that peed me off so much I sent him an e-mail. Now I have to go out. I do love your blog geoff, always gets some part of me or other vibrating with something.
-
Our Gelert, when he is sound up thus, is indeed a force of nature.
It’s interesting that these people are willing to interfere with life in the womb to correct what they think is nature’s mistake, but are wholesale against interfering with life in the womb in the form of abortion. Clearly they are not bright enough to appreciate their own paradox. I may write to them too, simply because stupid people annoy me and they’ve annoyed my Wednesday morning. -
On the other hand, read this: http://www.albertmohler.com/blog_read.php?id=893
-
Coboró, Mohler indeed hits the right note in his comments about Coulter. But it seems to me to be simply an extension of his "hate the sin, but not the sinner" view of gays. And that’s a sentiment that I’ve always found rather insidious. It allows, as we’ve seen, him to move to the blithe pronouncement that only heterosexuality is right, and homosexuals should be "cured". It’s basically the "homosexuality is icky and it makes the baby Jesus cry" view of the world. It’s a view that would deny my being if it could.

Leave a reply to Brian Cancel reply