Yesterday, I wrote up a comparison between the current versions of Picasa and Windows Live Photo Gallery. Lying awake in the small hours last night, I thought of additional things that I should have covered in the comparison. So if you read the entry yesterday, I suggest you take another look at it. It’s now been considerably reworked and expanded.
Picasa versus WLPG Redux
Categories:
4 responses to “Picasa versus WLPG Redux”
-
Before 3.9 had you tried AvPicFaceXmp allowing to tag face in Picasa and use them in WLPG?
-
I knew of AvPicFaceXmp, but I hadn’t used it, because I was not using Picasa, and the reason that I wasn’t using Picasa was because of the geotag display bug…
Now with version 3.9, I’m trying Picasa again, and using it primarily for face tagging. My main tool remains IDimager.
-
-
You are using a pretty detailed method for tagging, have you considered also a way to managed the people tags, I have just people 1,000 faces and I would like to have grouping option.
-
I just have two categories for people whose faces I tag: Family and Friends, and these categories are part of the hierarchy of Descriptive Tags. While I have more categories under the “People” class, I haven’t bothered doing any face tagging in these photos where they have faces of people who are not either family or friends. This might change in the future.
For the moment, I will continue to rely on the flexibility of a hierarchy of descriptive tags to be able to slice and dice the collection of photos.
-
Geoff Coupe's Blog 
Leave a reply to Geoff Coupe Cancel reply