Reflections on life at “De Witte Wand”…

  • My Epitaph

    Well, I think it has to be the opening sentence of Sam Harris’ response to the Edge challenge. I quote:
    No one has ever mistaken me for an optimist.
    Yup, that fits me like a glove. And while I luxuriate in the feel of that description, may I take this opportunity to direct you not only to Sam Harris’ reply to the challenge, but to other responses that seemed to me to have something pertinent to say about our brief strut on the world’s stage. Daniel Everett, for example, Geoffrey Miller, Simon Baron-Cohen, Clay Shirky, Martin Rees, or Gino Segre. Then there’s the current sniping between those who believe in string theory and those who don’t. Bring on the Large Hadron Collider, I say. Hopefully that will settle some arguments.
     
    But, at the last, no matter how pessimistic I may feel, I wouldn’t want to share the optimism of Rudy Rucker. It seems closer to Woo-woo than serious optimism.

    Leave a comment

  • The Wind in the Willows

    I seem to have spent rather a lot of time in front of the haunted fishtank yesterday. As well as Torchwood and The Sarah Jane Adventures (see previous entry), I also watched the Beeb’s new adaptation of The Wind in the Willows.
     
    On the whole, I thought this was pretty successful. It seemed to capture the atmosphere of the book pretty well, and the main characters were played by good actors. I particularly liked Mark Gatliss’ Ratty. And while I’ve never liked the one-note samba that is Little Britain, I thought that Matt Lucas did a good job with Toad.
     
    But one thing jarred. I admit that I haven’t read the book for nigh on fifty years, but I don’t think that the Piper at the Gates of Dawn chapter came across as well as my memory serves. I’m pretty sure that part of the awe of seeing the god Pan is that he seems gigantic to Ratty and Mole; but in the TV adaptation he’s just a boy with shaggy trousers larking about in a tree. Sometimes the power of imagination is greater than the art (and budget) of the filmmaker… 

    Leave a comment

  • Torchwood Finale

    The first series of Torchwood came to a conclusion last night on BBC Three with a double episode; one of which I quite liked and one of which I found almost total bollocks from beginning to end.

    I must say that I’ve found watching Torchwood to be a thoroughly dispiriting experience. The characters, with the possible exception of Captain Jack, just make me want to take them aside and slap them across the face hard while saying "stop being so silly!". And the only reason that I make an exception for the Captain is because the character really has had very little to do throughout the whole series, apart from in the penultimate episode.

    This was a half-decent episode, where the Captain and the Toshiko character find themselves trapped in 1941 in a dance hall. The Captain meets the "real" Captain Jack Harkness – i.e. the man whose identity he has assumed. There were some nice touches – the intercutting between current and past time in the dancehall, particularly the moment when we see Gwen in current time and a dancing couple waltzes through the camera shot between us and Gwen. And it was good to see Murray Melvin again as the sinister dance hall manager: Bilis. Melvin does understated menace very well indeed.

    Perhaps the episode worked well for me because the usual flash-bang-wallop style of Torchwood was scaled down in favour of what was almost a simple love story. Except, of course, as befitting a series with Russell T. Davies behind it, this had a twist: it was boy meets boy, and boy loses boy when boy one goes off the next day to be shot down in the war and boy two gets returned to current time. The character of the "real" Jack Harkness was nicely played (by Matt Rippy), moving from comradely confidence to shy confusion as he realises that he is attracted to "Torchwood" Captain Jack. But somehow, given that this was 1941, I thought that it would be unlikely that he would ever be able to make the public declaration of his love in the manner that was depicted in the episode. They made a lovely couple, though.

    But while I’m still wiping a tear from my eye, the final episode undoes all the good and returns Torchwood to its usual level of unremitting silliness. Three of the Torchwood team have visions of their deceased loved ones who tell them to open the time rift. Instead of going "hang on, that was odd, I’d better tell the others about this" – I mean, they are supposed to be a team, aren’t they? – they all keep shtum, thus of course finally ensuring that the rift gets opened. Gwen at least has the benefit of knowing that she’s been given a vision (by Bilis), but clearly hasn’t the nous to understand she’s being used and thus sets up her own Truly, Madly, Deeply moment for Eve Myles, the actress playing Gwen. Mucus dutifully flows in copious amounts, but I just found it tiresome, because that’s all the Torchwood characters have ever seemed to me: tiresome and self-obsessed.

    And when the rift is finally opened, what stomps out? Some big bad CG monster. Oh dear, oh dear, oh dear. I mean, there was plenty of interesting potential in the idea that the initial rifts in time were already causing havoc – the reintroduction of the Black Plague, for instance – and time slippages on a massive scale could in themselves bring about the end of civilisation as we know it. But no, that wasn’t good enough for the scriptwriters, they have to introduce a rather silly giant devil, literally out of thin air. It says a lot for how little this final episode worked for me when I found the most electric moment was hearing the sound of the Tardis at the very end. I wish I could fast-forward to what happens next, back in the Doctor Who storystream, and wipe out all memory of the train-wreck that Torchwood has turned out to be. 

    But, to end on a positive note, earlier yesterday was the pilot episode of yet another Doctor Who spinoff, the Sarah Jane Adventures. OK, it was for children, but it had a fizz and sparkle to it that has been completely missing from Torchwood. And Lis Sladen was as wonderful as ever as Sarah Jane Smith. It can be done, you see. Why did Torchwood go so wrong?

    4 responses to “Torchwood Finale”

    1. Brian Avatar
      Brian

      Just saw this episode last night and, apart from getting choked at that last kiss, agree with you that the monster in the last scenes was silly in the extreme, if I’d had popcorn I’d have chucked it at the screen.  The close when he comes back to life looked like the start of a new religion, barf-making it was.  Yes, a lot of it has devolved into soap opera but John Barrowman is rather pleasing on the eyes, isn’t he?  Pity about about the Ice Dancing programme though.  Perhaps once he’s married and settled down he’ll make better career choices. 

    2. Geoff Avatar
      Geoff

      One can only hope about the career choices, but he is married. Well, it’s a civil partnership, because that’s all the British government could bring themselves to do, but it’s a start. He and his partner have already been together these past 16 years…

    3. Geoff Avatar
      Geoff

      Oh, yes, and the resurrection at the end… I kept saying to myself that the scriptwriters had better not be so bathetic as to have him "awakened with a kiss", and what happens? Yup, Gwen kisses him and he comes back to life. That was the point I was literally yelling "Wankers!" at the screen…

    4. […] to our haunted fishtanks next month. While I’ve been pretty disparaging about the series in the past, I have to say that I thought that it redeemed itself with the Children of Earth […]

    Leave a comment

  • Questions From The Edge

    The online magazine Edge asks a question of its contributors each year. The question for 2007 is What are you optimistic about? Why?
     
    The answers start here. And I wish I could share Daniel Dennet’s optimism, but I am much more pessimistic than he is.

    Leave a comment

  • Reflections From Iraq

    Riverbend is an Iraqi blogger. She reflects on the year, and on Saddam’s execution. Her voice is worth listening to.
     
    (hat tip to Not Saussure for the link)

    Leave a comment

  • Timewasters…

    …in the nicest possible sense. A reminder of two little computer games that I enjoyed losing some hours with. Both charming in their own idiosyncratic way. 
     
    First up: Samorost 2. As I wrote at the time, it has a feel of animation by a Jan Svankmajer or Roland Topor about it.
     
    Second: Grow Cube.
     
    Enjoy.

    Leave a comment

  • Hormones

    Sometimes, I just love the Dutch. Who else could pack so much into an education film, designed to be shown in a Science Museum. Ladies, gentlemen, and small furry animals, may I present to you: Hormones. I remember it well, it just didn’t seem quite so funny at the time.

    Leave a comment

  • Pup Puzzle – Part Two

    Leave a comment

  • Hitchens’ Hackery

    I’ve filed this under "entertainment" as I don’t have a category called "tripe" at the moment. "This" being an article by Peter Hitchens on the so-called "Evolution versus Intelligent Design debate" The article turns out to be pretty much a load of old codswallop published in something that can only loosely be called a newspaper. The fact that Hitchens manages to mistake Intelligent Design for "an interesting intellectual development" in his opening sentence when it is nothing of the sort made me want to projectile vomit from the outset.
     
    Luckily, Jason Rosenhouse manages to overcome my feelings of disgust and deconstructs Hitchens’ folderol more level-headedly than I am able to do.

    2 responses to “Hitchens’ Hackery”

    1. Brian Avatar
      Brian

      Although his statement,  "But Darwinism is all about events that happened when there was nobody there to witness them. And it is also about events which – if happening now – are happening too slowly for anyone to live long enough to see them" is patently ridiculous and marks him as an observationist, he does not completely throw the baby out with the bathwater, as is evidenced in the closing statement of the article.   Where he fails in his argument is to treat Darwinism as a fact, forgetting that, as with all theories, it is constantly being tested and revised as we acquire further knowledge and evidence.  There is far more evidence for evolution in the fossil record than there isn’t.  Hitchens assumes however, that what we can’t answer about Darwinism mitigates against it.  This is sloppy thinking. 
       
      Were he truly as open minded as his closing statement enjoins us to be, he would set forth an argument for Darwanism and Creationsim to coexist.  They need not be mutually exclusive for the faithful and would satisfy the agnostic.

    2. Geoff Avatar
      Geoff

      Coboró, you write of the "argument for Darwanism and Creationsim to coexist.  They need not be mutually exclusive for the faithful and would satisfy the agnostic". I’m sure that this can be so for the faithful and the agnostic, but so far I’ve not found a satisfactory argument for myself. However, I’ll keep looking. On my "to read" pile is Kenneth Miller’s Finding Darwin’s God. I’m interested to see whether I find his arguments to be persuasive. 

    Leave a comment

  • Up To A Point, Queen Beatrix

    I didn’t hear it myself, but apparently Queen Beatrix’s Christmas message this year underlined the importance of free speech. But then she went and blew it by adding that of course no one has the right to insult anyone else. Er, then it isn’t really "free speech" is it, Beatrix? Silly woman.

    2 responses to “Up To A Point, Queen Beatrix”

    1. Brian Avatar
      Brian

      I quite agree with her but would say she could have articulated her point better.  Along with freedom of speech comes the attendant responsibility of civil discourse in a civilised society.  People are too quick to trumpet their freedoms without pausing to consider that every freedom comes with a responsibility.  Having failed to do so does not make Her Majesty silly, only perhaps in need of a better speech writer.  Please send her my address.

    2. Geoff Avatar
      Geoff

      Tee-hee! Perhaps you should consider it for your next job. And while you are right about the need for responsibility, there remains a treasured place in my heart for the value of ridicule in puncturing pride and pomposity. There seems to be just a little too much these days of people trumpeting that they have the right not to be offended. No one and no thing has the right to that particular get-out-of-jail-free card.  

    Leave a comment

  • Sometimes…

    …I wonder why can’t we just lighten up a little? There’s a rather depressing firestorm broken out in a small corner of the Blogosphere over transgender. In particular whether transgendered people support the patriarchy or not. A good, but rather worthy, discussion of the minutiae can be found here.
     
    Basically, from my point of view, either we treat transgender people as people or we don’t. And depressingly, there are a number of people, who call themselves feminists, who don’t. Pot, kettle, black, sistas.
     
    But, by way of lightening up, as a result of exploring the various discussion threads, I came across this totally politically incorrect, but oh so brilliant video from the Scissor Sisters: Filthy Gorgeous.
     
    Thank god for art, and outrageous camp. Amen.

    Leave a comment

  • Fireworks

    Here in the Netherlands, New Year is celebrated by letting off millions of euros worth of fireworks. And every year, there’s someone hurt or killed. This year, by way of a change from the usual hard-hitting public safety campaign, there’s a series of humorous videos purporting to show the owner of a Chinese fireworks factory showing how to let off his products.

    2 responses to “Fireworks”

    1. Michael Avatar
      Michael

      Hello!!   I’m Michael from the Home Town of the Fireworks—–Liuyang China.we are one of the fireworks manufacturer in China,I know you are also one of the fireworks liker.and I know the fireworks is one of hazardous goods,but we are always improving the safety as a manufacturer.Hope all of you know.  
      Regards                          
      http://www.simbafireworks.com

    2. Geoff Avatar
      Geoff

      Hello, Michael. Thanks for dropping by. Good luck and success.

    Leave a comment

  • The White Blanket

    I’ve only just caught up with this telling of the story behind Breugel’s Hunters in the Snow. It’s fascinating. Go and read it… 

    One response to “The White Blanket”

    1. robert Avatar
      robert

      Just trackbacked (I hope!) to say that I’d like to add that the BBC2 programme – mentioned at the end of the article filled out some of that ground and was well worth a watch – even at 6pm on Christmas day (I hope it is repeated!).
      and now find that a reload of the comment page gets it to -semi- work!

    Leave a comment

  • What Sex Is Your Brain?

    …Take the BBC’s handy-dandy quiz to find out.
     
    I came out as an average male brain, but I got a full score on the spatial reasoning test, which ties in with the engineering background…
     
    (hat tip to PZ Myers)

    Leave a comment

  • Planetocopia

    An interesting series of alternate earths – many taking our own earth as the starting point and altering one or more variables, for example, the planetary tilt…
     
    (hat tip to Nicholas Whyte)

    Leave a comment

  • Images of Wonder

    Phil, the Bad Astronomer, has his choice of the ten best Astronomy images of 2006. They are stunning, I agree, and his number one – the magisterial picture of Saturn, with a distant earth just peeping through the rings – is simply awe-inspiring.

    Leave a comment

  • Little Faces

    Liz Henry, over at the ED SF Project, pens an appreciation of the short story "Little Faces" by Vonda McIntyre. I’ve only read one other work by McIntyre, Dreamsnake, which I enjoyed very much. Liz Henry’s description of Little Faces is intriguing, and a good example of describing the "what if…" factor of Science Fiction. A sample:
    "Little Faces" is about a society of women symbiotic with their living spaceships. It answers the age-old question, "How do you write an exciting romantic crime story set in a genderfucked anarchic utopia?"
     
    The women’s biology, sex, and gender is complicated. Males of the species, the "companions," are not quite sentient, and are attached to the female’s bellies somehow; they are a bit like children, mates, pets, or extra limbs. They’re like remora dildos with the emotional personalities of fire lizards. They’re also a bit like hard drives that contain part of the memory and experiences of the other women who created them. Out of modesty, on formal occasions they are kept covered, though a thoughtful woman would use a lacy veil so that her companions can see out.
    It sounds irresistable…  

    Leave a comment

  • Pup Puzzle

    Here’s a probability puzzle for you to get the brain cells working again. Or, as in my case, to bash your head repeatedly against the wall trying to work it out.

    Leave a comment

  • Just Ring Apeldoorn…

    "Acupuncture" is the latest in a long string of excellent TV Ads for a Dutch Insurance Company, whose slogan is Even Apeldoorn Bellen (Just Ring Apeldoorn). It won the award for best Dutch commercial for 2006. It’s guaranteed to raise a smile and bring on a feeling of schadenfreude.
     
    Also, check out the "Schoonmaaksters" (Cleaning Ladies) commercial link on the same page…

    Leave a comment

  • The Nun’s Story

    You know me – atheist to a fault; not having any truck with any religion and other such superstitious nonsense. Well, today, I sat down and watched Fred Zinnemann’s The Nun’s Story, starring Audrey Hepburn on TV.
     
    I must say that the film both impressed and appalled me. I can see that the film would probably appeal to the religious amongst us. The bedrock of the nuns’ "obedience, poverty and chastity" was well conveyed. I could see the attraction of the ritual, of the discipline. The process of becoming a nun (at least at that time portrayed in the film) was clearly a well-designed psychological journey, evolved and honed over centuries for maximum effectiveness. And the desired-for result in a person who lives for others, and lives without the vanities of the world is an ideal worth striving for. But I would try for that without the, to me, totally irrational belief in a god. 
     
    The power of the film was that it was finely balanced. It seemed to me the crux of the story is the question put to Sister Luke by the Mother Superior: Is she to be a nun or a nurse? And for Gabrielle van der Mal the answer is ultimately to drop the prentence of being Sister Luke, and to regain true meaning in her life by being a nurse. It’s the right choice for her.
     
    A good film, I’m glad I finally caught up with it. 

    Leave a comment