Reflections on life at “De Witte Wand”…

  • When Is A Blog Not A Blog?

    When Robert Scoble says so, apparently. He takes issue with the claim that Windows Live Spaces is now the most widely used blogging service. The whole heated and ultimately pointless discussion reminds me of medieval philosophers discussing how many angels can dance on the head of a pin, and has the same relevance to reality, i.e. none whatsoever.
     
    I really couldn’t care less if Windows Live Spaces does not have sufficient of what Robert considers to be a blog to make it number 1, or even number 100, for that matter. It offers me a free tool to use for my ramblings, and one that’s good enough for me. And the same technology platform is used by millions of others to use as they see fit, whether that is an online diary, a photosharing site, social networking, or a combination of all these things.
     
    I think Robert is also forgetting Sturgeon’s Revelation – it should hardly come as a surprise that large numbers of the millions of Windows Live Spaces are crap or not populated with any entries at all. That’s human nature.

    One response to “When Is A Blog Not A Blog?”

    1. Gelert Avatar
      Gelert

      90 per cent of everything is crud! I adore that and shall adopt it forthwith, its so comfortingly true and should be taught in school.
       
      And yes, read his angel/pin head rambling and agree with you all the way. When is a blog not a blog, and who gives a damn. Always good coming here Geoff, yours in one of the best blogs I visit. Keep going. Just heading out for the airport. Laters….

    Leave a comment

  • The Training Videos From Hell

    The UK arm of Microsoft commissioned a couple of training videos from Ricky Gervais and Stephen Merchant. Gervais is in his full-on cringeworthy David Brent character, while Merchant plays the increasingly embarrassed Microsoft employee.
     
    Good stuff, but probably the humour is lost on many non-British speakers. And while Microsoft UK probably thought they were being really cool commissioning these videos, I have a sneaking suspicion that Gervais and Merchant end up subverting the whole idea of company values (video 1) and personal development reviews (video 2). Probably not what Microsoft would have wished for…

    Leave a comment

  • Travel Alert

    Er, everyone??? But I don’t have a gel-filled bra… Does this mean that I can’t travel anymore? Perhaps that’s not such a bad thing.

    Leave a comment

  • All Boys Together

    Ophelia puts her finger on it. There is something ineffably mad, sad and bizarre about groups of men bonding under some misguided belief that what they are doing is righteous and holy. It is, as she says, stupid guy stuff. Ptuii. 

    Leave a comment

  • Energy For Free

    An Irish company – Steorn – is claiming that they have developed a technology that produces free, clean and constant energy. Sigh, here we go again, perpetual motion machines are perpetually being touted. The company has even issued a challenge, and placed an advert in The Economist, to recruit 12 scientists to test its claims.
     
    Let’s think about this for a moment – why is the company seeking to select only scientists? And note, too, it is the company that will pick and choose the 12 scientists. As James Randi says,  "Authority does not rest with scientists, when emotion, need, and desperation are involved. Scientists are human beings, too, and can be deceived and self-deceived". It would seem to me to be better for Steorn to submit its technology to Randi’s Million Dollar Challenge. That way, not only would the company have its claims subjected to intense scrutiny by skeptics, but it would also receive a cash injection of a million dollars, should the first law of thermodynamics be proven to be broken.
     
    My bet is that the first law will not be broken and that this is yet another hoax.
     
    Steorn’s video makes for entertaining viewing as well. Lots of fairly unsubtle playing on the fear that nasty people control our precious oil, or that it’s only available from difficult places. That latter point was underscored with a drawing showing an oil pipeline and two penguins. Er, oil exploration in the Antarctic is banned by international treaty for 50 years, and if that’s supposed to be the Alaskan oil pipeline, then someone should tell them that there ain’t no penguins in Alaska. 
     
    I classified this entry under the category of Entertainment, since Science doesn’t strike me as being accurate.

    Leave a comment

  • Hysteria At Large

    Armando Iannucci, in today’s Observer, sums up my feelings about the hysteria that is washing over us at the moment. But he says it much better, and funnier, than I could. 

    2 responses to “Hysteria At Large”

    1. Gelert Avatar
      Gelert

      T.W.A.T. This post made me laugh Geoff, as I prepare to fly off on holiday. Thanks mate.

    2. Geoff Avatar
      Geoff

      Hope you have a good holiday. Don’t forget to put your gel-filled bra in your checked baggage…

    Leave a comment

  • The Pear Tree

    The pear tree in the garden is laden down with fruit.

    060819-1206-02

    We don’t know what variety of pear it is, but we know that we can cook them. We’ve already had some poached in red wine, cooked by the mother of a friend. And last night, I tried out a recipe from Nigel Slater’s Kitchen Diaries: poached pears with ice-cream and chocolate sauce. Very simply poached in a sugar syrup with a vanilla pod – but they tasted delicious.

    The next recipe for pears that I might tackle is Pear and Almond Tart from Amanda Hesser’s The Cook and the Gardener. But I probably need to take a deep breath, it’s a traditional French recipe that looks complicated and time-consuming. That’s one thing that makes me favour Slater’s recipes – they seem simple, yet they deliver excellent results. 

    2 responses to “The Pear Tree”

    1. Michael Avatar
      Michael

      Ooh, pears!  We were recently given pears grown by a friend of Christine’s.  I’ll send along a couple of versions of a clafoutis aux poires – essentially cut up pears cooked in a crepe batter.  Dead easy, really.  You’ve probably already got a version in one of those books, but I’ll send along anyway.

    2. Geoff Avatar
      Geoff

      Great! Thanks, Mike.

    Leave a comment

  • Your Experience May Vary

    While I’m not particularly looking forward to next Tuesday, I trust that the experience will not be too similar to that undergone by Steven Wells. His tale of the Philadelphia health system is both screamingly funny and terrifying.
     
    (hat tip to Granny for the link)

    Leave a comment

  • Taking The P*ss

    For non-British-speaking readers, the title translates as "having a laugh at someone’s expense". It seemed an apposite title for this rumination by Orac, over at Respectful Insolence. Look, just because Gandhi did it, doesn’t mean to say that it’s a good idea…

    Leave a comment

  • Under the Knife

    A couple of weeks ago, I noticed a swelling in my groin. Oh, bugger, I thought, it’s not a hernia… Oh, but it was… That was confirmed by the local doctor.

    I mean, there’s something faintly ridiculous about a hernia. You would think that evolution would design the muscles around the abdomen to hold it all in, but no, the small intestine is just gagging for the chance to *pop* out through the muscles and luxuriate as an unwelcome swelling under my skin.

    I wouldn’t mind so much, but I’ve been here before. Admittedly, it was fifty years ago, but still: "been there, done that, got the T-shirt". Then, as a child of seven, and the first time I’d been operated on, it was all a bit scary. I still remember being wheeled into a room just by the operating theatre and being left there for what seemed like hours (it was probably all of five minutes). I got thoroughly worked up because, as I lay there on the trolley, I could look around the room at all the glass-fronted cabinets stuffed to the gills with knives, saws, scalpels and things that, while I had no idea of what they could do, certainly seemed to be promising a lifetime of pain.

    Fast-forward fifty years, and here I go again. Once more into the breach, dear friends. Or rather, once more to repair the breach… This time, this being the Netherlands, I don’t get a general anaesthetic. Oh no, I get a needle in my back that is supposed to deaden my nether regions while the surgeon fiddles around. I’m not sure which is worse, actually. To pass out completely and to be blissfully unaware, or to be conscious and have the chance of hearing the surgeon say "oh, shit".

    I saw the anaesthetist yesterday to agree on the method of anaesthesia. Well, in principle, one has a choice, but I have the impression that people end up with whatever the anaesthetist wants.

    I confess that it didn’t boost my confidence one jot when the anaesthetist asked to see my back. I assumed that he wanted to see where he was going to stick the needle, but he was muttering that it must be very low down. I suddenly realised that he was looking for the hernia. "Er, no," I hastily clarified, "the hernia is in my groin – at the front, not at the back". Duh. I’m seriously considering following a friend’s suggestion and using a felt-tip pen to mark the spot, together with helpful messages such as "my leg does not need to be amputated", and "my kidneys are perfectly fine, thank you very much".

    I have to report to the hospital at 07:45 am on Tuesday morning. With luck, they’ll kick me out, still breathing, more or less in one piece, but with the bonus of extra stitches, later that day.

    Watch this space.

    Update: A Dutch friend points out that the Dutch word  for "slipped disc" is "hernia", while the Dutch for "hernia" is "lies breuk" (pronounced leece brurk). That is almost certainly the cause of the confusion with the anaesthetist, but the worrying thing is that I’m pretty sure that I didn’t say "hernia". As best I can recall, he consulted my case notes and then asked to see my back. When I said that I had a "lies breuk" (in my best Dutch), he then scratched something out and wrote something else in my notes. The more I think about it, the more the felt-tip pen plan seems like a good idea…

    Leave a comment

  • What’s Your World View?

    Another quiz to pass the time…
    My (unsurprising) result was:
     
    You scored as Materialist. Materialism stresses the essence of fundamental particles. Everything that exists is purely physical matter and there is no special force that holds life together. You believe that anything can be explained by breaking it up into its pieces. i.e. the big picture can be understood by its smaller elements.

    Materialist

    94%

    Existentialist

    81%

    Modernist

    75%

    Cultural Creative

    44%

    Postmodernist

    44%

    Fundamentalist

    31%

    Romanticist

    25%

    Idealist

    13%

    What is Your World View?
    created with QuizFarm.com

     

    Leave a comment

  • Landscape Largesse

    This is a breathtaking shot. Look at the original version to see the full glory.

    Leave a comment

  • The Theory Is Great, But The Reality Sucks

    I’m really curious to see how the Great Terror Plot will actually pan out. My money is currently on it being a damp squib born of a couple of deranged losers (who bonded in the daffodils), with a few innocents caught in the police lasso.

    Much has been made of the liquid-based explosives. However, this commentary on the known characteristics of the most likely constituents would seem to suggest that the practicality of successfully mixing up a brew in an aircraft in flight is akin to a snowball surviving in Hell.

    The commentary leads the author (Perry Metzger) to entertain three possibilities:

    1. The terrorists had a brilliant idea for how to combine oxidizer and a ketone or ether to make some sort of nasty organic peroxide explosive in situ that has escaped me so far. Perhaps that’s true — I’m not omniscient and I have to confess that I’ve never tried making the stuff at all, let alone in an airplane bathroom.
    2. The terrorists were smuggling on board pre-made organic peroxide explosives. Clearly, this is not a new threat at all — organic peroxide explosives have been used by terrorists for decades now. Smuggling them in a bottle is not an interesting new threat either — clearly if you can smuggle cocaine in a bottle you can smuggle acetone peroxide. I would hope we had means of looking for that already, though, see below for a comment on that.
    3. The terrorists were phenomenally ill informed, or hadn’t actually tried any of this out yet — perhaps what we are told was a "sophisticated plot" was a bunch of not very sophisticated people who had not gotten very far in testing their ideas out, or perhaps they were really really dumb and hadn’t tried even a small scale experiment before going forward.

    It probably won’t surprise you to learn that my money is on (3). 

    (hat tip to Schneier on Security)

    Leave a comment

  • The Primeval Forest

    This is a brilliant shot of the sort of forest that exists deep in one’s imagination (well, at least it does in mine). Click on the photo to see it full size and then sink into your memories of childhood dreams all those long years ago…

    Leave a comment

  • I Rest My Case

    To all those idiots who say that being gay is not natural because it doesn’t exist in the animal world, I simply point to this heartwarming story of storks raising their chicks.

    Leave a comment

  • Multitasking

    I find it difficult enough to concentrate on one task, so Tapan Dey has got me knocked into a cocked hat.
     
    While we’re on the subject of doing multiple things at once, Dr. Crippen draws my attention to this piece of hard wiring in the neurons. Can you do it?

    Leave a comment

  • Thames Town

    Prince Charles, eat your heart out. You may have been able to build Poundbury, incorporating your twee ideas of a fantasy British village, but I think Thames Town has trumped your hand. Being built by the Chinese in Songjiang, about 30 km from Shanghai, this is shaping up to be, in the words of Jonathan Glancey in the Guardian today, "a grotesque and extremely funny parody of an olde English town seen through Chinese eyes, and built by canny British developers".

    The Guardian story claims that Thames Town is only one of seven satellite towns, the other six each have a national architectural style taken from a country as a theme. However, according to this story on designbuild-network.com, there are in fact nine towns being built, borrowing from the UK, the USA, Russia, Spain, Sweden, France, the Netherlands, Germany and Italy. I wonder what Holland Town will look like?

    Leave a comment

  • Run For The Hills

    To paraphrase Hermann Göring, "when I hear the words management consultancy, I reach for my gun". This news has got my trigger-finger real itchy.

    Leave a comment

  • Reverse-Engineering Religion

    Who designed the cow? That’s the question that Daniel Dennett posed when he began his address to the audience at this year’s TED conference. He uses it to examine the memes of religion. It’s worth watching and pondering. I was pleased to see that the lancet fluke manipulating the ant made an appearance.

    Leave a comment

  • Spot-On, Marina!

    Marina Hyde, in this piece for the Guardian’s Comment is Free, muses about the reports that terrorists have not only been training in far-off Pakistan, but also on Beatrix Potter’s doorstep, in England’s Lake District.

    I share her view that really, there is something risible about these narcissistic losers bonding in the daffodils on the shores of Lake Windermere. But her point is absolutely to the point:

    It does not belittle murder to admit that that murder is being planned by a bunch of intense, lost, silly boys. But it should absolutely affect our response. Is it truly worthy of us to dismantle long-cherished legal freedoms for this lot?

    Absolutely not, is of course my reaction. And I totally agree with her when she writes:

    This should not for a moment suggest that the danger from such people is not real. But being unable to laugh at it is a danger itself. It implies a critical lack of self-belief, suggesting virtues and values to be so tenuous that they can be shaken by Mittyish socio- or psychopaths, when the reality is that we will never be able to fully protect ourselves against some kinds of ingenuity.

    Er, Tony, are you listening?

    Leave a comment