…oh, really?

Yes folks, once again I’m referring to the good people at Microsoft, in particular the team behind OneDrive. They’ve just announced “A simpler sharing experience at OneDrive.com”. According to them:

The new experience is, in a word, simple. We show the two most popular options for sharing right up front with big blue buttons that are easy to see and easy to hit. We use terms that are understandable to a wider range of users. We optimized for the common cases and present the rarely used options in less distracting ways. Basically, it’s not as messy.

What they didn’t say is that they have removed one option: the ability to shorten a link from two lines of gobbledygook down to a simple string of 7 or 8 characters. This was perfect for those people who needed to include links in printed documents.

Now they have to rely on people being able to type, without errors, something like https: //onedrive.live.com/redir?resid=6AA39937A982345B!10782&authkey=!AMBcijD6MBaGeF0&v=3&ithint=photo%2cjpg. Many email clients will also break these long links by splitting them over two lines so that they won’t work when clicked on.

Needless to say, there’s been a storm of protest about this removal. So much so that Microsoft has (I suspect rather shamefacedly) now added an update to the post:

We’re working on a new approach to shortening the sharing links that will better enhance our users’ experience. Unfortunately, we had to remove the current experience in preparation for the new one. We always keep the best interest of our users in mind so we appreciate your patience as we work this out. We expect to have it ready soon.

What is even more astounding is that Microsoft apparently tested this new experience on “28,000 real-world users”. One might wonder why on earth none of the 28,000 users picked up on this removal of a very convenient feature (or perhaps Microsoft didn’t bother to ask them about it). One might also wonder why Microsoft didn’t get the new approach to short links ready before rolling out the complete new experience to the world, but I suppose we should never underestimate Microsoft’s unerring ability to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.

Ever since 2005, I’ve been using Microsoft’s Windows Live Writer to create these blog entries. It has been my mainstay. An easy-to-use application that has allowed me to create and edit my blog on WordPress with ease. But ten years in computing terms is a long time, and ever since 2012 there has been a question mark hanging in the air – would Microsoft continue supporting Windows Live Writer, or would it be dropped, like so many other good and useful software applications have been (Picture It!, Microsoft Digital Image Pro, and Microsoft Money) I’m looking at you).

For a while now, Scott Hanselman and others within Microsoft have been trying to get a version of Windows Live Writer released as Open Source, and today’s the day.

An open source fork of Windows Live Writer is now available as Open Live Writer. Congratulations to Scott and the OLW team for reaching this milestone.

This blog entry has been created and published to my blog using it. I intend to support this effort by switching to Open Live Writer from now on. It is clear that Microsoft will be pulling the plug on Windows Live Writer at some point in the not too distant future.

The King is dead – Long live the King!

Yesterday, my Surface 3 was sitting on my desk, plugged in for charging and quietly minding its own business. Our dog Watson decided to walk past and got his leg caught in the cable. He carried on walking and pulled the Surface 3 off the desk and on to the tiled floor. I saw it happen, but was unable to catch it in time. All I could do was to utter a very loud expletive.

The Surface 3 landed on the point of one corner. I picked it up in dread, fearing that, at the very least, the screen would have cracked. To my surprise, the screen was intact, and the machine still working. The only evidence of the fall is the slight dent on the corner.

It’s tougher than I thought.

Almost a year ago, I blogged about the poor state of internet in the Dutch countryside, and about our area in particular. Even though the Netherlands as a whole is high up in the league table of countries enjoying fast broadband internet, 196,000 households and 132,000 businesses in the Netherlands do not have fast broadband internet (defined by the EU as being 30 Megabits per second or faster). Far from it, many households and businesses around here are lucky if they get 3 Mbps.

A year ago, it looked as though things might improve – the Province of Gelderland, in cooperation with ten Local Authorities (including ours), announced an initiative to lay fibre optic cables in countryside areas.

Alas, it looks as though the project has run into difficulties – some thrown up by the EU, and some thrown up by KPN – the largest telecom provider here in the Netherlands.

The plan was for the initiative to set up a company to lay the cables, and then lease them out to network operators for running of the network and provision of internet services to customers. The EU took a dim view of this idea, claiming it was not the role of government to get involved in the free market.

Then KPN announced that it would be investing less in the laying of fibre-to-the-home (FTTH), and focusing more on upgrading the old ADSL-based copper cable network by investing in VDSL technologies, and also investing in 4G mobile networks.

Broadband internet has been discussed a number of times in the Dutch parliament this year, and the Minister of Economic Affairs (Minister Henk Kamp) has made it clear that he does not see a country-wide rollout of fibre-optic cables as the answer, but is more interested in having a smorgasbord of technologies (strangely enough, eerily similar to those proposed by the KPN).

Unfortunately, I think that all this will lead to a further gulf in the digital divide between those who can enjoy fast internet at an affordable price, and those who must remain in the slow lane, or pay through the nose for fast internet. The difference between living in the town or the countryside, in other words.

Let’s take my situation as a typical example of someone living in the countryside. The original plan from the Province and the Local Authority was to provide me with FTTH for a one-time cost of €500 and a small additional monthly charge on top of my internet subscription to cover the total cost of laying the cable.  The cost of laying FTTH in the countryside is high, because new cables have to be laid to each home, farm, or business. According to Stratix, this would be in the region of €6,000 per connection (with some outliers in the Netherlands reaching several hundreds of thousands of euros). By contrast, in a town, the cost is around €600 per connection.

However, if the FTTH plan does not go ahead in some fashion, what are the alternatives?

KPN has said that they intend to upgrade 100,000 households currently on ADSL to VDSL technologies. This entails laying fibre from the telephone central exchanges to the wiring cabinets placed in a neighbourhood. The new fibre would replace the current copper cables that connect the cabinets to the exchanges. However, the connections between the wiring cabinets and the individual homes or premises would still be the original copper cables. KPN claims that this upgrade would deliver internet speeds of up to 100 Mbps. What they don’t say is that these speeds are only achievable over short distances. If you live (like I do) more than 2 kilometres from a wiring cabinet, then you won’t see much improvement over ADSL speeds. So, while I currently enjoy 4 Mbps over ADSL, I might get 8 Mbps over a VDSL connection. The only way that this could be improved would be for KPN to invest in many more wiring cabinets placed closer to houses out in the countryside. There’s also the point that these VDSL technologies consume more energy than ADSL (and more than fibre). Their ecological footprint is not good. Not for nothing does Stratix label these technologies as “last gasp”.

KPN has also just announced that it will offer fast internet via 4G to the 100,000 households that it views as being “deep in the countryside”. It claims that this is “the solution for places with less than 6 Mbps internet speed via ADSL”. Well, that’s certainly me, but then KPN qualifies it by saying:

In order to protect the quality of our 4G network, this [solution] is only available for addresses where:

• Internet speed is less than 6 Mbps via ADSL and there is no planned upgrade in speed in the coming 6 months
• The addresses are outside of town or village centres
• There is sufficient capacity in the 4G network

Our house certainly qualifies for the first two conditions, but it seems that there is a question mark against the capacity of KPN’s 4G network – when I entered our address into KPN’s availability check, it claimed that “Alas, this [solution] is not available for your address”.

[Update: and now, a few days later, the availability check claims that the solution is available for our address.]

Even if it were to be though it is available, I am far from convinced that it is the solution for me. One big difference between the subscriptions for ADSL/fibre and 4G is that ADSL/fibre subscriptions are based on charging for speed, whilst 4G subscriptions are based on data volume. So currently, I pay €50 per month for our internet and telephone access, with no data caps and unlimited telephone calls within the Netherlands, whereas with KPN’s 4G solution I would be paying €50 per month for internet only (no telephone), with a data cap of 50 GB per month. I would need to pay an additional €38 per month for our telephone. And 50 GB per month is nothing – last month we used 105 GB – and that is without any downloading/streaming of films from sites such as Netflix. Admittedly, I download preview builds of Windows 10 and other software under test, but I would argue that I am not too different in my usage pattern than someone working from home making use of Cloud services and video-conferencing. Equally for families using Netflix or similar services – 50 GB per month is not very much at all.

The KPN 4G service does not support interactive TV services either, so unlike fast internet via fibre or VDSL/ADSL, you can’t have a so-called “triple-play” subscription (a combined internet+telephone+TV service). Most of us out here in the wilds get our TV service via satellite dish, so we’d have to continue with our subscriptions to the satellite services company (CanalDigitaal).

I summarise the costs of the various scenarios in the table below. For the “Fibre” scenario, I’ve assumed that fibre-optic cable has been laid to our house, that I’ve paid the one-off charge of €500, and that the cable company would make a monthly supplemental charge of €22.50 to recoup the cost of laying the cable over a 20 year period. The triple-play subscription is what I would pay to my current internet service provider for a download speed of 20 Mbps.

Monthly charge	Current	KPN 4G	Fibre
Internet	–	€50	–
Telephone	–	€38	–
TV	€17.95	€17.95	–
Internet+Telephone	€50	–	–
Internet+Telephone+TV	–	–	€55
Fibre connection charge	–	–	€22.50 (est.)
Total:	€67.95	€105.95	€77.50

To sum up then, the 4G alternative to FTTH is not attractive to me, either on practical or economic grounds. Sorry, Minister Kamp and KPN, you will have to do better than this.

My last post looked at the hardware and performance of the new Lenovo Yoga 900. This post takes a look at the experience of the initial setup of Windows 10, and the software bundled with the Yoga 900 by Lenovo.

Windows 10

The Yoga 900 comes with Windows 10 installed and ready to be set up when the Yoga 900 is first turned on. “Setting up” involves choosing the language(s) you want Windows 10 to use, creating a user account, and connecting to a WiFi network. I’m based in the Netherlands, and Microsoft’s Cortana is not (yet) available for the Dutch market. Since I wanted to try out Cortana, I set up Windows 10 to use British English, and set the region to the UK:

There is, of course, the legal stuff to accept…

The next step is to connect to a Wi-Fi network. While this step can be skipped, and network connections set up later, it’s best to do it now for two reasons. First, critical software updates to Windows 10 that were issued after the operating system was installed during the manufacture of the Yoga 900 can be immediately installed, and second, if you want to create a Microsoft account during set up, it’s easier to be connected to the internet for this step.

Once connected, Windows 10 will offer to use the Express settings for the fastest setup, but you can elect to customise any of the defaults if you so wish.

At this point, if you have set up the network connection, Windows 10 will download and install any critical updates for you.

Then comes an important question: “who owns the Yoga 900?”. The choice is between you or the company/organisation you work for. Your answer determines whether the Yoga 900 gets automatically joined to the company’s IT network to use the systems there, or, if it is a machine for your personal use, it will be set up for you. Your answer determines which apps, settings and permissions will be used during the rest of the set up process.

Assuming that it is your Yoga 900, then the next step is to create your account on the machine. If you already have a Microsoft account, used on other PCs and/or Windows Phones, then enter your details here. If you don’t yet have a Microsoft account, you can use this step to create one. You can also elect not to have a Microsoft account associated with this machine at all, but use a “local” account that is unique to this Yoga 900. You do this by choosing the “skip this step” option.

The last step in the process is to choose your PIN, which is a faster way to log in than typing in a long, strong, password (you do have a long, strong, password, don’t you?).

And now you’re all set; Windows 10 will set up your default apps and bring you to the desktop:

The Start menu will probably look something like this, with a set of default apps:

These will be a mixture of apps provided by Microsoft and those provided by Lenovo for the Yoga 900. Which brings me to:

Lenovo Software

It’s no secret that I’m not a fan of the OEM practice of bundling a long list of software applications in with their machines. Lenovo is well-known for doing this. For the most part, I find such applications to be of limited, if not questionable, value. The first thing I usually do on setting up such a machine is to remove all such non-essential software. To be fair to Lenovo, they are trying to clean up their act, and the Yoga 900 comes with the shortest list of bundled applications that I’ve seen so far from them. Looking in the Windows 10 list of installed programs, I found the following:

 

Application Type	Application Name
Lenovo Applications	Lenovo Accelerator Application Lenovo Battery Gauge Lenovo Companion 3.0 Lenovo Experience Improvement Lenovo FusionEngine Lenovo ID Lenovo Photo Master Lenovo Product Demo Lenovo QuickOptimizer Lenovo REACHit and SHAREit Lenovo Settings 3.0 Lenovo Solution Center LenovoUtility OneKey Recovery User Guide
Security & Productivity	McAfee LiveSafe (trial) Microsoft Office 2016 (trial)

Having a separate application for the User Guide seems somewhat pointless, as the User Guide is now integrated into the Lenovo Companion.

Looking at the list of Lenovo applications, there’s a couple that I haven’t the faintest idea of what they do, and one that I can guess at. The unknowns are:

• Lenovo FusionEngine
• Lenovo Utility

It would be nice to have a clear statement from Lenovo as to what these applications are intended to achieve.

Lenovo Experience Improvement

My guess is that the Lenovo Experience Improvement application is collecting and reporting to Lenovo non-personally identifiable statistical data, for example:

• both the configuration and region when the system is first activated,
• ongoing information on how often key components are used.

Not everyone is happy with this sort of data-gathering, and those that aren’t can simply uninstall this application. However, it doesn’t overly bother me, and many manufacturers are doing it these days – even my printer is phoning home and reporting statistics. This kind of information helps manufacturers better understand how their products are being used and perform in the field, and this helps influence design decisions for future product generations.

Lenovo Battery Gauge

This is actually a useful extension to the standard battery control of Windows 10. It replaces the standard Windows 10 battery notification in the taskbar with a (somewhat clumsy) Lenovo design.

It’s useful, because it gives access to a “conservation” mode of charging, where the battery is only charged to 55-60%. This maximises the life of the battery. This mode is not available in standard Windows 10. However, the design of the Lenovo control could be improved. If the icon is touched or clicked, the full Lenovo Settings app is started, and the power section shown:

This uses a lot of screen real estate to display relatively little information. It’s also not obvious that not all the power controls are being shown here. You need to scroll down to see additional options, but there is no indication that the page is scrollable until you try to interact with it. I’ll have more to say about the Lenovo Settings app in a moment. But first, here’s how the same information is presented on the Yoga 3 Pro:

This is a much more compact method of displaying options to the user, and personally, I much prefer this approach to that of the Lenovo Settings app.

Lenovo Settings

In an ideal world, the controls for hardware specific features would be integrated into the Windows 10 Settings screens directly; everything would be accessible via the Windows 10 settings, which would be extended as required by specific hardware or features. In the days of Windows 7, this was done by extending the Control Panel applets with extra tabbed input panels.

Now, in Windows 10 as it is at the moment, we have a bit of a dog’s dinner, where some settings are only accessible via the Lenovo Settings app, some are exposed as extra tabs in traditional Control Panel applets (for example, the Synaptics Touchpad settings), and some are directly accessible via Windows 10 Settings.

The Lenovo Settings app has its own manner and style of user interface. It would be much more preferable if it followed the same style guide as Windows 10 Settings. That would help it to blend in with the “house style” of Windows 10, and not stick out like a sore thumb.

In some cases, there are clickable links on the Lenovo Settings pages that invoke traditional Control Panel applets. Here, for example is the input settings page, with links under the “More” heading to invoke the mouse properties window or the Pen and Touch window.

Clicking on the “mouse properties” link should bring up the Synaptics tab of the traditional mouse Control Panel applet:

Well, it is invoked, but unfortunately the window is not brought to the foreground, and if the Yoga 900 is in tablet mode there is no indication on the Taskbar that the window even exists. This is not a good user experience.

Another problem area in the Lenovo Settings app is that the settings do not always reflect reality. It is very easy, for example, to get into the situation where the Settings app claims that the keyboard backlight is “on”, when in fact it is “off” – and vice versa. Setting features via the keyboard seems to be independent of setting them via the Settings app, when good user interface design would seem to demand that all controls should be in lockstep and display the current actual settings at all times.

Lenovo Companion

• The Lenovo Companion app brings together the following areas:
• Support (warranty, technical support, and community support)
• System health (battery, storage, memory, and hardware diagnostics)
• System update (automatic download and installation of Lenovo-specific updates)
• Technical news, Lenovo-specific articles and news on apps made by or offered by Lenovo.

I have found that I really only use the Companion app to check for system updates. For community support (i.e. accessing the Lenovo Forums and Knowledge Base articles), I will go directly to the Forums via a Web browser – it’s far faster and easier to use than accessing them via the Companion app.

Lenovo Photo Master

This appears to be an app developed for Lenovo by CyberLink. It allows you to browse your photo collection held on the Yoga 900, and to import photos to that collection from online services such as Flickr, OneDrive and Facebook.

It is one of the many alternatives to the built-in Photos app of Windows 10. Given that the Photos app is still very limited in functionality (but supposedly still being developed and extended by Microsoft), many people seek out an alternative.

Unfortunately, Photo Master is itself fairly limited. It does not support descriptive tags, held in photo metadata. So you can’t search for photos by using tags[1], or manage the tags in your photos. It does support tagging of people’s faces in photos – it can identify a face (but not who the person is), and you can then add a name to the face. It stores this information in the photos as metadata. However, it uses Microsoft’s proprietary People tag schema to do this. This schema was introduced by Microsoft back in Windows 7. Since then, an open standard for face tagging has been developed by the Metadata Working Group, and implemented in photo products such as Google’s Picasa, Adobe’s Lightroom and IDimager’s Photo Supreme. It’s a little unfortunate that Lenovo has not chosen to use this open standard, but has gone with a Microsoft proprietary approach (that itself seems to have been dropped by Microsoft since 2012).

Lenovo QuickOptimizer and Lenovo Accelerator Application

This was a separate application in the Yoga 3 Pro (OneKey Optimizer), but now it appears to have been split into these two components which are in turn integrated into the Lenovo Companion app. There is also an Optimizer icon placed on the Taskbar which can invoke two pop-up controls; one to launch the “full optimizer” (which invokes the Companion app opened to the “Optimize your IdeaPad” section) and an “App acceleration” control allowing you to choose which applications you wish to accelerate.

I have to say that I’m somewhat uneasy about using the app acceleration control in particular, especially after reading this review of the original Optimizer app, with its rather damning conclusion. I’ll be giving these applications a miss.

Lenovo Solution Center

This is another utility that previously led an independent existence, but which now can be invoked via the Companion app in the “Hardware Scan” section. Unfortunately, it’s an application designed for the traditional desktop environment, and is not aware of desktop scaling. The result being that it displays in a small window lost on the Yoga 900’s desktop (which here I have set to 200% scaling, rather than the recommended 250%. If it were to be at the recommended setting, then the LSC window would be even smaller):

LSC needs to be brought up to date for today’s world of high resolution desktops.

Lenovo REACHit and SHAREit

I’m not the target customer for these two apps. I live almost entirely inside the Microsoft ecosystem. I don’t own any Apple or Android products, and I use OneDrive, not DropBox or any other cloud storage service. Via OneDrive, I can easily share information with friends and family even though they may live equally exclusively in Apple or Android ecosystems. So REACHit and SHAREit seem to offer me no added value. As a result, I don’t use them.

OneKey Recovery

This is a system image backup and recovery utility. It can be invoked from within Windows, or directly from the BIOS via a physical button (recessed) on the right hand side of the Yoga 900. It can be used to take backups of a running system and restore them, or restore the Yoga 900 to its original factory state, using a recovery image stored on a hidden disk partition.

Windows 10 (and Windows 8.1 before it) also has the ability to restore the Yoga 900 to its original factory state, so OneKey Recovery is no longer the essential utility that it once was. However, in the event of a complete failure of Windows, it can be a lifesaver, offering a restore to Windows 10 in its factory state at the push of a single button.

Software summary

With a few exceptions (e.g. the Battery Gauge), I remain somewhat unconvinced about the value-add of Lenovo’s software. For the most part, however, you can choose whether to use them or not, and uninstall them if you so wish.

---

[1] Windows 10 does know about photo metadata, and you can use File Explorer to search on photo tags.

Introduction

Beginning in January 2008, Lenovo has introduced a range of consumer-oriented computers named IdeaPad. The range has a number of different series within it, each designed for a different purpose or user group. The Yoga series is a line of tablets and laptops. The name “Yoga” was chosen because the laptops have hinges that allow the screen to be fully folded back (up to 360°) to convert a laptop into a tablet. A Yoga laptop can also be placed in “tent” or “stand” mode for showing presentations or movies.

The latest generation is the Yoga 900, introduced in October 2015. It is clearly the successor to the Yoga 3 Pro, which was introduced in October 2014. The Yoga 900 has almost exactly the same dimensions and design as the Yoga 3 Pro, including the unique Lenovo “watchband” hinge. For that reason, I’ve used the Yoga 3 Pro as the basis for comparison with the new Yoga 900 in this review. Compared to the Yoga 3 Pro, Lenovo has also made changes in the Yoga 900 design, both internally and externally, which I will point out in this review.

I’ve been able to do this review because Lenovo has provided me with an example of the Yoga 900 in mid-September, ahead of the official launch on October 19, 2015. I’ve spent the past couple of weeks using it, and comparing it with a Yoga 3 Pro that I’ve had since January 2015.

This post focuses on the Yoga 900 hardware and its performance. I have a separate post looking at the software environment of the Yoga 900, i.e. the setting up of Windows 10, and a look at the software bundled with the Yoga 900 by Lenovo. 

Here’s a table that shows a quick comparison between the Yoga 3 Pro and the new Yoga 900:

	Yoga 3 Pro	Yoga 900
OS	Windows 8.1 64/8.1 Pro 64	Windows 10 64 / 10 Pro 64*
Screen	13.3” QHD+ 3200×1800 IPS, 300nits	13.3”QHD+ 3200×1800 IPS, 300nits
CPU	Intel Core M 5Y70/5Y71	Intel Core i7-6500U* / Intel Core i5-6200U
Graphics	Intel HD Graphics 5300	Intel HD Graphics 520
Memory	8 GB DDR3L	Up to 16GB DDR3L*
Storage	256GB/512GB SSD	256GB* / 512GB SSD
Audio	JBL stereo speakers with Waves Audio certification	JBL stereo speakers with Waves Audio and DOLBY Home Theatre certification
Webcam	720p, 30 fps	720p, 30 fps
Connectivity	802.11 a/c Wireless Bluetooth V4.0	802.11 a/c Wireless Bluetooth V4.0
Battery Life	44.8 Watt Hour – 7.2 hours	66 Watt Hour – 9.2 hours
Ports	2xUSB 3.0 1xDC-in with USB 2.0 function, 4in1 card reader (SD, MMC, SDXC, SDHC), Micro-HDMI, Audio Combo Jack	2xUSB 3.0 1xDC-in with USB 2.0 function, 4in1 card reader (SD, MMC, SDXC, SDHC), USB-C, Audio Combo Jack
Weight	1.19 kg. (2.62 lbs)	1.29 kg. (2.84 lbs)
Dimensions	330 x 228 x 12.8mm (13” x 9” x 0.5”)	324 x 225 x 14.9 mm (12.75” x 8.85” x 0.58”)

Table 1
*There is an i7-6500U, 8GB and 256GB SSD fitted on the Yoga 900 I have, and it is running Windows 10 Pro.

Both the Yoga 900 and the Yoga 3 Pro are examples of what Intel calls the Ultrabook class of laptop. That is, they are ultrathin, using solid-state drives, low-power Intel Core processors, and (because of their thinness) do not have optical disc drives or full-size Ethernet ports. They are the Windows equivalent of Apple’s Macbook Air series.

Unboxing

On September 17, UPS delivered a rather plain box: white (on top) and orange (underneath), with four icons on the side representing the four Yoga configurations (Laptop, Stand, Tent, and Tablet).

Like the box of the Yoga 3 Pro, it contains a slick piece of paper engineering – after taking off the lid, you fold back the two flaps covering the top, and as you do so, the Yoga 900 rises out of the box to greet you. This is a nice touch to the packaging.

Underneath the Yoga 900 are compartments that hold the power adaptor, the special USB power cable, and a sleeve containing the quickstart user guide. In my example, the guide was missing, it may have still been in preparation. However, I didn’t really need it, since I’ve been here before, so I could get straight on with plugging in the adaptor and cable and setting up Windows 10 on the machine (see my separate post).

Before doing that, I thought it would be useful to compare the Yoga 900 side-by-side with the Yoga 3 Pro, so here are some photos of the two machines together. The Yoga 900 came in the Champagne Gold colour, while the Yoga 3 Pro is Clementine Orange.

Yoga 900 Externals

As you can see from Table 1, the dimensions of the two machines are very nearly the same. The Yoga 900 (on the right in the photo below) is slightly narrower and thicker than the Yoga 3 Pro, but at a casual glance you wouldn’t see it.

As introduced with the Yoga 3 Pro, the hinge on the Yoga 900 is the distinctive “watchband” design, which I personally find appealing and which works smoothly and very well. Lenovo states that there have been improvements to the design in this generation.

Continuing on our tour of the externals, we come across the first marked difference on the left hand side of the machines. The Micro-HDMI port of the Yoga 3 Pro has been replaced with a USB-C port in the Yoga 900, which (according to the Yoga 900 User Guide) supports USB 3.0, native DisplayPort 1.2 video and VGA/HDMI output. Not (yet) having suitable USB-C cables or adaptors, I couldn’t test this out for myself. Nonetheless, I think that Lenovo is right to be forward-looking with adopting USB-C.

The other ports on this side of the machine remain the same. In the photo above, the first port can act as a standard USB 2.0 port, but it is also the charging port for the Yoga 900/Yoga 3 Pro. Lenovo provide a special USB cable for this purpose, which has a connector that is physically different from a standard USB male cable (it has a small “nub” on one side). The second port is a standard USB 3.0 port, while on the other side of the USB-C/Micro-HDMI port is the card reader port. Here’s a photo of the special USB charging cable connector (above) compared with a standard USB 2.0 connector (below):

Looking at the right-hand side of the machines, one thing immediately leaps out because of its absence. Unlike the Yoga 3 Pro, the Yoga 900 has no rocker switch for volume control.

Everything else is there – but no physical volume control switch. I’m a little surprised by this. It means that the only physical switches for volume control on the Yoga 900 are on the keyboard. For an ordinary laptop, that would be perfectly sufficient. However, this is a Yoga – when placed into one of the other modes (Tent, Stand or Tablet), the keyboard is disabled. Every other tablet (and smartphone) device that I’ve ever used has had a rocker switch on the side of the device used as a volume control; the Yoga 3 Pro has it, so why has Lenovo dropped it for the Yoga 900? On the face of it, this seems a strange design decision on the part of Lenovo.

Other than that, the Yoga 900 has exactly the same controls and ports as the Yoga 3 Pro on this side of the machine. From the left in the photo above: the power button, a recessed button that activates OneKey Recovery (of which more later, in the post on the Yoga 900’s software); the display rotation lock button, the headphone jack socket, and a USB 3.0 port. This last port can also be used to charge devices such as Smartphones via a USB cable.

Lifting the lids of the two devices reveals the next major difference; this time a welcome improvement. The Yoga 900 has a sixth row of keys – a line of dedicated function keys on the top row. It seems that Lenovo received negative feedback over the 5-row keyboard of the Yoga 3 Pro, so the traditional 6-row keyboard has been restored in the Yoga 900. An excellent decision that will please many keyboard jockeys.

The keyboard backlight now has two illumination levels in the Yoga 900, as opposed to the single level of the Yoga 3 Pro. However, there has also been a change to the design of the keys that I feel is a step backwards. As I think you can see in the photo above, the edges of the keys in the Yoga 3 Pro are translucent, whilst those in the Yoga 900 are solid black. This reduces the effectiveness of the backlight in the Yoga 900. For the sake of chic all-black design, backlight functionality has taken a hit. It’s a minor point, but I find the Yoga 3 Pro keys are better in this respect.

The trackpad appears to be the same in both machines, with an area of 60mm x 90mm. It’s a Synaptics trackpad, that unfortunately has not been certified by Microsoft as a Windows Precision Touchpad, perhaps because it is slightly smaller than Microsoft’s recommended optimal size of 65mm x 105mm. This also means that the trackpad settings are not integrated into Windows 10 Settings. More on the trackpad and keyboard in the Yoga’s Modes: Laptop section.

Turning our attention to the screen, both Yoga models have the same high-resolution (3200 x 1800) touchscreen displays, but Lenovo has improved the aesthetics by having a single piece of glass in the lid of the Yoga 900; the Yoga 3 Pro has a strip of black plastic running along the bottom edge. These high resolution screens are almost de rigeur in quality laptops and Ultrabooks these days, so it’s no surprise to see one in the Yoga 900. The display has a ratio of 16:9, which makes it ideal for some uses; less so for others. See my further thoughts on this in the Yoga’s Modes section.

Both Yogas have a Windows button positioned below the display, for use primarily when in Tablet mode. Neither Yoga has haptic feedback for this capacitive button (unlike Lenovo’s ThinkPad tablets). This could simply be because it is physically impossible for Lenovo to fit a haptic mechanism in such a thin lid, but I do somewhat miss this feature.

In comparison to the Yoga 3 Pro, the Windows button of the Yoga 900 is also more difficult to see in some lights. Of course, it could also be argued that, with the advent of Windows 10, the Windows button has become redundant, since, unlike in Windows 8.1, the Windows Taskbar with its Start button is always present – even in Tablet mode. It would not surprise me to see this button dropped altogether in the next generation of Yoga devices.

At the top of the screen is the Yoga 900’s webcam; capable of 720p @ 30 fps (the same as for the Yoga 3 Pro), along with the dual-array microphone.

The speaker grilles are positioned underneath on the Yogas. Those on the Yoga 900 are slightly larger than on the Yoga 3 Pro, although the specifications of the JBL speakers are the same.

Yoga 900 Internals

Lenovo heard feedback from customers that the performance of the Core M processor in the Yoga 3 Pro was slower than anticipated. Lenovo’s response is to include the latest (6^th) generation of Intel Core processors, codenamed “Skylake”, in the Yoga 900. Two versions will be available in the Yoga 900 range; a Core i5 and a Core i7 model. These processors are a step up in speed and power compared to the Intel Core M processors used in the Yoga 3 Pro. See the Benchmarks section for comparative results.

Skylake also introduces a new generation of the graphics processor architecture, and the Yoga 900 has an Intel HD Graphics 520 engine[1], which, as can be seen from the benchmarks, improves 3D graphics performance significantly over the Intel HD Graphics 5300 in the Yoga 3 Pro.

The Yoga 900 can have up to 16 GB system memory installed – improving on the maximum of 8 GB of the Yoga 3 Pro. Storage for both Yogas is the same; either 256 GB or 512 GB SSDs can be specified. It’s a similar story for wireless connectivity; both will support 802.11 A/C Wi-Fi and Bluetooth version 4.0.

The battery is another area where Lenovo has improved on the Yoga 3 Pro as a result of customer feedback. Like many others, I found the battery life between charges on the Yoga 3 Pro to be disappointing. Lenovo has increased the battery capacity of the Yoga 900 to 66 Watt hours. That is a third more capacity than that of the Yoga 3 Pro. The Yoga 900 is very slightly thicker and heavier than the Yoga 3 Pro (14.9 mm vs 12.8 mm and 1.29 kg vs 1.19 kg), but it achieves its increase of a third in battery capacity at a cost of only 15% extra thickness and 8% in weight. it’s a sacrifice I’m happy to make for the increased running time on battery.

Both Yogas are equipped with cooling fans. See the benchmarks section for comments on effectiveness and noise.

There’s one omission that I personally find a little disappointing: there is no built-in GNSS to feed GPS coordinate data to the Windows Location service. It’s a hobbyhorse of mine – I feel that mobile devices should have a GNSS chip fitted as standard. Downloadable maps in map and navigation apps are standard these days, but I still can’t use the Yoga 900 (or indeed the Yoga 3 Pro) off the grid without an additional Bluetooth GPS logger to track its position.

However, that omission apart, the Yoga 900 is a very attractive looking Ultrabook, with an excellent display and connectivity options.

Benchmarks

Having attractive looks is one thing, but how does the Yoga 900 measure up in performance? I ran some standard benchmarks on both the Yoga 900 and the Yoga 3 Pro in order to have a comparison between them. I did a quick subjective performance test using a Digital Audio Workstation application that I run on my desktop PC. Finally, I ran a simple battery life test.

PassMark Benchmarks

PassMark Software provide benchmarking software and hardware. I downloaded their Performance Test 8.0 software and used it to run benchmarks on both Yogas. The results are shown in Table 2 below. I also downloaded HWMonitor from CPUID, to record the maximum temperature of the CPU reached when running the benchmarks.

	Yoga 900	Yoga 3 Pro
PassMark	2214	1575
CPU Mark	4439	3628
2D Graphics Mark	410.5	338.8
3D Graphics Mark	953	392.9
Memory Mark	1771	1598
Disk Mark	3201	3208
Max CPU Temperature	71°C	71°C

Table 2

In the results table above, it is clear that the CPU and graphics performance of the Yoga 900 over the Yoga 3 Pro is much improved, particularly for 3D graphics. Only the disk performance remains unchanged between the two machines.

As a general principle, I don’t like fans in portable devices, and have expressly purchased tablets for myself that do not have them. Nonetheless, for Ultrabooks with the performance of the Yoga 900, it is probably inevitable that such a device will have a fan. During the running of the benchmarks, the fan on both machines could be heard. Subjectively, the loudness of both fans sounded the same to me. I did not find it intrusive – a hissing sound – and I think it would be at an acceptable level for most people.

What is interesting from the table above is that the maximum temperature reached by the CPU in both machines during the running of the benchmarks is the same. The i7-6500U processor in the Yoga 900 will certainly be giving out more heat than the M 5Y70 in the Yoga 3 Pro. Given that the fans were equally loud, this would seem to support Lenovo’s claim that they have improved the cooling system in the Yoga 900.

Windows System Assessment Tool

The Windows System Assessment Tool was first introduced by Microsoft in Windows Vista as a means to compare the performance of the hardware of Windows PCs. For Windows Vista and Windows 7, Microsoft provided an applet (the Windows Experience Index applet) to display the results. Although Microsoft no longer provides this applet in Windows 8.1 and Windows 10, the assessment telemetry is still in place and can be used by third-party tools to display the Windows Experience Index. I used the WEI tool from ChrisPC to display the results for both the Yoga 900 and the Yoga 3 Pro.

For the most part, the results from this set of benchmarks confirm the findings of the PassMark benchmarks. CPU, graphics, and memory performance is improved in the Yoga 900, whilst disk performance remains the same. For some reason the WSAT tool claims that 3D graphics performance is the same for both machines; I suspect that the PassMark tests are more rigorous, and give a truer picture.

Digital Audio Workstation Test

As a result of the improvements to the CPU, GPU and larger system memory, the Yoga 900 can tackle more demanding tasks than the Yoga 3 Pro. By way of a quick subjective experiment, I installed Cubase LE AI Elements 8 on the Yoga 900, and used it with a Cubase project that uses 10 virtual instruments in the HALion Sonic SE workstation, also running on the Yoga 900. This performed well.

Battery Life Test

Lenovo claims that the Yoga 900 battery can last for 9 hours between charges when playing HD video at 200nits. I did a simple test of battery life under the following conditions:

• Display always on at 50% brightness
• Speakers at 100% volume with Dolby Audio on and set to music playback
• Continuous music playback via Groove Music
• Music streamed from a media server via WiFi

Under these conditions, the battery lasted for 6.5 hours. Not the 9 hours claimed for by Lenovo, but certainly more than can be achieved by the Yoga 3 Pro under the same conditions.

Performance summary

As a result of this testing, it seems clear that the Yoga 900 will perform very well in activities involving both productivity (office work) and media consumption (watching movies/videos and listening to music). It can also be used for media creation work (digital audio). Battery life is improved over that of the Yoga 3 Pro.

Yoga’s Modes

A prime selling point of the Yoga is the fact that it can be folded into a variety of modes. At the time of introduction of the original Yoga back in September 2012, this was a unique innovation. Since then, the concept has been copied by other manufacturers such as Dell, HP, Toshiba and ASUS, which proves that imitation is indeed the sincerest form of flattery. It also clearly demonstrates that the concept is perceived to have market value. Lenovo followed up with the introduction of the “watchband” hinge in September 2014, and now with the Yoga 900 we can see both innovations in a mature form.

These are the four modes of the Yoga:

Laptop

The traditional laptop mode is probably the starting point for most people, and the mode in which I suspect most people will be using it for the majority of the time.

The Yoga 900 keyboard delivers in this mode. The extended keyboard, and its quality feel (something for which Lenovo has a reputation for), will please those who pound keyboards all day long.

I am less positive about the trackpad. As mentioned earlier, this is a Synaptics device that has not been certified as a Windows Precision Touchpad by Microsoft. The result is that it is not integrated in Windows 10 Settings, and Synaptics mimics the required Windows 10 touchpad gestures in their own driver. I also note that there are many complaints about the software driver in the community support forums of Lenovo. I feel that Lenovo should get this trackpad properly certified and fully integrated into Windows 10.

The display is excellent, high resolution, good colours, and, at 300nits, bright enough for me. It’s a 16:9 ratio display, so it’s ideal for watching movies. For office work (e.g. word processing in Word, Excel), I personally prefer at least a 16:10 ratio. Even better would be the 3:2 ratio of Microsoft’s Surface Pro 3 and Surface 3. The 16:9 ratio is also not ideal in the Tablet mode (see later). The Yoga 900 has a large bezel area surrounding the display. It should be possible to fit a 16:10 ratio screen that is the same width as the current display into the Yoga’s lid. If the (now redundant) Windows Button were to be dropped in the next Yoga generation, this would be very easy to do. The overall dimensions of the Yoga would then remain the same, but having a 16:10 ratio display would serve the Laptop and Tablet modes far better than the current 16:9 ratio display, in my opinion.

Tent

This mode is ideal for media (movies and videos) presentations, particularly in space restricted situations, e.g. on a shelf or an aircraft table. For viewing movies, of course, the 16:9 ratio of the display is now ideal. Couple the Yoga with a wireless presenter, and you can use this mode for PowerPoint presentations as well. In this mode the keyboard and trackpad are automatically disabled.

Stand

As an alternative to the Tent mode, the Stand mode can be used for media and PowerPoint presentations. It requires more space than the Tent mode, but the screen can be set to a greater range of angles for the best viewing experience. The keyboard and trackpad are automatically disabled in this mode also.

Tablet

The last mode is where the lid is completely folded back over the (disabled) keyboard, and to convert the Yoga 900 into a tablet. You can select to have Windows 10 automatically switch into Tablet mode, or to give you the option to switch manually. In this mode, the 10-point touchscreen comes into its own. However, I find that the size of the Yoga 900 (and the Yoga 3 Pro before it) makes for a slightly unwieldy tablet. While the overall size ratio is very close to that of an A4 pad of paper, it’s bigger, and it’s just too big for me. The 10.1 inch Lenovo ThinkPad 10 is much more my ideal size of tablet. The ThinkPad 10 also has an active digitiser and pen, which again I find important to have in a tablet. Artists also want pens with their tablets, and while many artists might prefer the larger size of the Yoga 900, without proper pen support, they will be crossing it off their list of devices to consider.

Talking of A4 pads of paper brings up one last point. One of the frequent uses of a tablet is for reading books or magazines. And once again, the 16:9 ratio of the Yoga 900 provides (in my view) a diminished reading experience over devices with 16:10 ratios (e.g. the ThinkPad 10) or 3:2 ratios (e.g. the Surface 3). Pages are rendered longer and narrower in 16:9, and the reading experience suffers as a result.

I would certainly make use of the tablet mode of the Yoga 900, but for me, and my usage patterns, it would not be the most frequently used mode. Still, having the option is something that a traditional laptop could not offer me.

Overall Conclusions

In my opinion, the Yoga 900 is a clear advance over its predecessor, the Yoga 3 Pro. Lenovo has listened to customer feedback and successfully addressed the major weak points of the Yoga 3 Pro, while maintaining its style and design quality. The plus points are:

• Higher performance suitable for a wide range of consumer and business users
• Improved keyboard
• Improved battery life between charges
• Excellent display
• Build quality and style
• Flexibility in use

There are some minus points (in my view):

• The trackpad is not certified as a Windows Precision Touchpad
• The physical volume control switch has been dropped.
• Few Lenovo apps deliver real value-add (see this post for details).

And perhaps Lenovo could give consideration to the following for the next generation of the Yoga:

• Move from a 16:9 screen ratio to at least 16:10, if not 3:2.
• Include an active pen option in the Yoga 900 range.
• Include a GNSS chip to deliver GPS coordinates in real-time to the Windows Location service.
• Put back the volume control rocker switch.

It is a fine example of the Ultrabook class of computer. It also offers additional flexibility with the configurations that it can be folded into. I like it.

---

[1] Yes, the Yoga 3 Pro has Intel HD Graphics 5300, but despite being a higher number, it has a lower performance. Intel has changed their numbering scheme “in order to reduce confusion”. It seems to me to have done precisely the opposite.