-
Knowing The Cost of Everything…
… and the value of nothing. That aphorism came into my head as I watched the performance of Sir David King, president of the British Association for the Advancement of Science on Newsnight. He apparently believes that the money that has been spent on the Large Hadron Collider could have been better spent on more directed research, for instance in combating climate change.Fortunately, Professor Brian Cox was on hand to pound King’s argument into tiny little pieces. It’s a truly magisterial smackdown. But I’m left with the uneasy thought that if King holds these bean-counter ideals, what’s he doing as president of the BAAS? -
Not The Day Of Rath
I see that vitamin pill-pusher Matthias Rath has pulled out of his libel action against Ben Goldacre and the Guardian newspaper. Good news indeed. Read more about the case and the horrifying background over at Ben’s Bad Science blog.Leave a comment
-
Artists’ Passing
Today’s obituary columns in the Guardian contain two names that register with me: Vernon Handley and Algis Budrys. I have a number of Handley’s recordings of Vaughan Williams in my music collection, and have always liked them. As for Budrys, I remember taking out his book Who? from the public library in Douglas as a teenager, and being intrigued by its exploration of the question of identity. I’m pretty sure that it was a Gollancz publication, with its bright yellow cover. I don’t have a copy of it in my library, just a collection of his short stories: The Furious Future. I should make time today to read one of his stories and to listen to a piece of Vaughan Williams conducted by Handley.Leave a comment
-
Big Scary Trumpets…
I don’t think that Jesus and Mo have quite got a hold of this thing called the scientific method…Leave a comment
-
WalkThis Way…
I can’t help but feel that the tabloids will have a field day with this study. Perhaps it’s just me, but a sample size of just 16 women seems very small to hang such claims on, and the language of the study seems to stray dangerously close to woo territory.Leave a comment
-
Four Basic Questions
Jonathan Drori, in his presentation at last year’s TED conference, poses four basic questions related to scientific understanding. They are designed to illustrate that perhaps you don’t know as much as you think you know – because we all make assumptions. As it happens, I got all of them right, but that’s probably because I had a good grounding in science, and then continued to learn as I grew up. As a result, I learned, after I had left school(!), that my boyhood assumption for the answer to question 1 was wrong. The answer to question 2 I knew at a very early age, because I performed the experiment for myself. And the answers to questions 3 and 4 I knew when I was still at school.I find it worrying that many people do not get all these questions right. In particular, that answer to the second question – I find that completely astounding. It must mean that they have never bothered to try out even simple things for themselves.Leave a comment
-
Omnivore’s Hundred
Here’s a foodie meme that’s currently doing the rounds. It’s a list of 100 foods that Andrew, over at the Very Good Taste blog considers that every self-respecting omnivore should have eaten in their lifetime.
I’ve bolded the items that I’ve eaten, and crossed out the items that I doubt whether I could ever bring myself to try…
1. Venison
2. Nettle tea
3. Huevos rancheros
4. Steak tartare
5. Crocodile
6. Black pudding
7. Cheese fondue
8. Carp (I may have had this when in Japan, but I’m not certain)
9. Borscht
10. Baba ghanoush
11. Calamari
12. Pho
13. PB&J sandwich
14. Aloo gobi
15. Hot dog from a street cart
16. Epoisses (ooh, I must look out for that the next time I’m at Bocholt market)
17. Black truffle (I may have had a shaving somewhere along the way, and I do have a tin of them in the parlour cupboard)
18. Fruit wine made from something other than grapes
19. Steamed pork buns
20. Pistachio ice cream (I’ve even had a go at making it)
21. Heirloom tomatoes
22. Fresh wild berries
23. Foie gras
24. Rice and beans
25. Brawn, or head cheese
26. Raw Scotch Bonnet pepper
27. Dulce de leche
28.Oysters(raw? no, I don’t think so)
29. Baklava
30. Bagna cauda
31. Wasabi peas
32. Clam chowder in a sourdough bowl (I’ve had both, but never chowder in a sourdough bowl)
33. Salted lassi
34. Sauerkraut
35. Root beer float
36. Cognac with a fat cigar
37. Clotted cream tea
38. Vodka jelly/Jell-O
39. Gumbo
40. Oxtail
41. Curried goat
42.Whole insects(nope, I draw the line)
43. Phaal
44. Goat’s milk
45. Malt whisky from a bottle worth £60/$120 or more
46. Fugu
47. Chicken tikka masala
48. Eel
49. Krispy Kreme original glazed doughnut (doughnuts, yes; oliebollen, yes; but never a Krispy Kreme)
50. Sea urchin
51. Prickly pear
52. Umeboshi
53. Abalone
54. Paneer
55. McDonald’s Big Mac Meal
56. Spaetzle
57. Dirty gin martini
58. Beer above 8% ABV
59. Poutine
60. Carob chips
61. S’mores
62. Sweetbreads
63. Kaolin (? er, hello, this is a clay)
64. Currywurst
65. Durian
66. Frogs’ legs
67. Beignets, churros, elephant ears or funnel cake
68. Haggis
69. Fried plantain
70. Chitterlings, or andouillette
71. Gazpacho
72. Caviar and blini
73. Louche absinthe
74. Gjetost, or brunost
75.Roadkill(like Liz, I have a very healthy fear of liver flukes)
76. Baijiu
77. Hostess fruit pie
78. Snail
79. Lapsang souchong
80. Bellini
81. Tom yum
82. Eggs Benedict
83. Pocky
84. Tasting menu at a three-Michelin-star restaurant
85. Kobe beef
86. Hare
87. Goulash
88. Flowers
89. Horse
90. Criollo chocolate
91. Spam
92. Soft shell crab
93. Rose harissa
94. Catfish
95. Mole poblano (I’ve made it!)
96. Bagel and lox
97. Lobster Thermidor (lobster, yes; thermidor, nope)
98. Polenta
99. Jamaican Blue Mountain coffee
100. SnakeLeave a comment
-
Art, What Is It For?
You may wish to view this piece of evidence before starting your answer.Thank you (I think) David Thompson.Leave a comment
-
Walking the Tightrope
Oliver Sacks reviews Hurry Down Sunshine in the current issue of the New York Review of Books. His review has made me add the book to my wish list of books to get. He reminds us that we are walking through life on "a narrow ridge of normality…, with the abysses of mania and depression yawning to either side".Leave a comment
-
We’re All Doomed
I suppose I shouldn’t really be surprised, but there does seem to be an alarmingly large number of people who think that the world is going to end in two days time when the Large Hadron Collider is switched on. Most of them sound simply worried, but I note that the scientists at CERN have also received death threats. I do hope that we are not going to see a real-life equivalent of the plotline in Contact where the first machine gets blown up by a religious nutter.What I would say is that it is not sensible to hold an opinion in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary. Whilst I understand that much of the language of particle physics is opaque, there does come a time when it is worth accepting the views of experts. The analogy I would give is the design of aircraft wings – I am happy to trust an expert in aerodynamics to get it right rather than offer my own opinion about what shape they should be. It’s really the case that the particle physics community are sensible, rational human beings who go about their research because they believe that exploring the subatomic world is good for our civilization, not to mention interesting. It is also true that if anyone, including myself, had any doubt about the safety of what we are doing, we would stop immediately. I and all my colleagues consider our personal safety and the safety of our families to be FAR more important than the search for the Higgs particle – indeed, if the risk were even as high as 1 in a billion, or whatever people quote, then I would be campaigning with you to stop it.Or, as he also has said, somewhat more pithily, and just as accurately:Anyone who thinks that the LHC will destroy the world is a twat.Quite.Leave a comment
-
Uncle Ken
Phil Penfold writes the obituary of his uncle, Kenneth Young, in today’s Guardian. A touching tale of a life well lived, I think.Leave a comment
-
Bear-Baiting and Bedlam on TV
Today’s Observer carries a powerful piece by Carole Cadwalladr, who looks at the stomach-turning phenomenon that is the Jeremy Kyle Show on TV. As a court judge said last year:‘It seems to me that the purpose of this show is to effect a morbid and depressing display of dysfunctional people whose lives are in turmoil. It is for no more and no less than titillating members of the public who have nothing better to do with their mornings than sit and watch this show which is a human form of bear baiting which goes under the guise of entertainment.It is telling that the practice of letting the public visit the Bethlem Royal Hospital (Bedlam) was apparently ended in 1770 because it "tended to disturb the tranquillity of the patients" by "making sport and diversion of the miserable inhabitants". That practice seems to live on in TV shows today and I can’t feel that society has been enriched or educated as a result.2 responses to “Bear-Baiting and Bedlam on TV”
-
Oh, how I enjoyed this article and I love you’re comparison of voyeurism of the those in the historic Bethlem Hospital and those who come onto the JK show.
-
Cicero, yes indeed, panem et circenses live on… Will we ever learn, or evolve beyond this point?
Leave a comment
-
-
Lost Horizons
The BBC is running a series of programmes in celebration of the fact that the Large Hadron Collider gets switched on next week. Last night was Lost Horizons, the punning and poignant title of a programme fronted by Professor Jim Al-Khalili that looked at the theories of the origins of the universe.
Punning, because the device used by Al-Khalili was to use extracts from the BBC’s science archives, in particular from the BBC series Horizon, to illustrate the theories. Poignant, because as I’ve remarked before, in recent years, the quality of most of the Horizon programmes has gone down the toilet, and to see these extracts from old Horizon programmes was to be sadly reminded of what has been lost.
Lost Horizons itself was good, partly because it eschewed the gimmicks of today’s Horizon programmes, and because Jim Al-Khalili knows what he’s talking about and presents it clearly and well.
Leave a comment
-
Frozen Air
I was perusing the internet today, as is my wont, when suddenly, I heard an almighty thump. I was sure that it was the sound of a bird flying into a window, but after having examined the windows in the front of the house, and at the side, I concluded that it might have been something else.However, when Martin returned, he asked me to get rid of the dead pigeon at the back of the house. Mystery solved. It had flown into the french windows at the back of the farmhouse. I’m sorry that it could not distinguish between air and glass. Let this be its memorial.Leave a comment
-
ReWalk
Here’s an intriguing replacement for a wheelchair – an exoskeleton for the legs. I’m sure that this commercial airbrushes out some of the fiddly bits (getting in and out of the car, for instance), and I wonder what the battery life is like; but nevertheless it’s probably the beginning of something that we’ll see more of. In a few year’s time, I’m sure that the sticks will be dispensed with, and the exoskeletons will take on additional balancing function.(hat tip to Science Punk)Leave a comment
-
Sinking Beneath The Waves
Yesterday, I mentioned the Delta Commission had reported their findings and recommendations on what the Netherlands should do in response to rising sea levels. Of course, the Netherlands is not the only country at risk, there are those in immediate danger, as well as those where the potential calamity is greater that we in the Netherlands could experience. An example of the latter is Bangladesh, where over the next 50 years, 17% of the landmass will disappear under water, leading to a displacement of 30 million people. Here’s a sobering article, by Tahmima Anam, in today’s Guardian about the situation there.Leave a comment
-
Heartless
Well, this music video is certainly different… First of all, there’s the irritating existentialism of soured love, but then – oh, but then – we take off into Little Shop of Horrors territory. Watch it through to the end…Leave a comment
-
Flowers For Algernon
Flowers for Algernon is the title of a short story (and a later novel) by Daniel Keyes. It takes the form of a diary kept by a 37-year-old man, Charlie, who has a low IQ. He becomes a subject in a medical experiment that is aimed at increasing intelligence. The experiment apparently succeeds, and the diary entries change as his intelligence increases and he becomes more aware of himself and society. Unfortunately, the effect of increased intelligence is only temporary, and Charlie (and the diary’s language) regresses once more to his former state. It is, I think, implied, but not made explicit, that the experiment has also caused his death.It is a tremendously moving story that affected me deeply when I first read it over forty years ago.Now I see that the diary entries have been transcribed into a blog. Because blogs customarily display the most recent entries first, this has had the interesting effect of now telling the story in reverse order – a sort of Memento effect. I’m curious to see whether this will work. I just wish that whoever was behind putting up the blog had bothered to spell Daniel Keyes’ name correctly…(hat tip to Cognitive Edge for the link)Leave a comment




Leave a comment