Reflections on life at “De Witte Wand”…

  • Filling the Gaps

    Aphra Behn asks us to mind the gap. I find the topic of cognitive science a fascinating one, even though it often makes my brain hurt.

    Leave a comment

  • Condensed Films

    Having mentioned one of my all-time favourite films, 2001: A Space Odyssey, over the weekend, I thought you might be interested in this. It’s 2001 condensed down to five seconds, for the benefit of those with an impaired attention span…
     
       
     
    The trouble is, it only really makes sense if you’ve seen the original…
    (hat tip to Phil, over at Bad Astronomer)

    Leave a comment

  • Knowing Your Death Day

    Now here’s an interesting proposition: would you be willing to take a one-way trip to Mars? I agree with Jim Downey, the one true thing is that we will all die, so, if you could advance the sum of human knowledge by volunteering for a one-way trip to Mars – would you do it?
     
    I’m not sure that I would have the courage to do this, but one thing is for sure, I would not stand in the way of anyone who, in the cold light of day, wanted to do this. I might even, on behalf of our fellow primates, salute them.

    Leave a comment

  • Craig Venter’s Modest Goals

    Here’s an absolutely fascinating talk given by Craig Venter at last month’s TED conference. This is important work offering great potential.
     
    However, I felt that he ducked one of the implications during the discussion after his presentation. The analogy used by the questioner was to suggest that just as the introduction of Pagemaker in 1985 sparked the revolution in desktop publishing, so Venter’s technology would eventually end up as affordable and available to a wide group of people. Venter was somewhat dismissive of bio-hacking, and seemed to be claiming that what his company does is not something that will end up as DIY genetics. My bet is that he will be proven wrong. 
     

    Leave a comment

  • City Life

    When I was young, I loved living in cities; the ten years I spent living in London in the 1970s gave me a great buzz. But now, I crave the quiet life. Visiting cities these days makes me feel like a country mouse wanting to scurry back to the open fields, the quiet woods, and the fresh air at the earliest opportunity. Then again, the megacities of today are utterly different from the London I knew thirty years ago.

    It’s also the case that at some point this year, the human race will pass some sort of threshold – for the first time in its history, there will be more people living in cities than not. I find that quite staggering – up along with the statistic that, since I was born, the world’s population has almost trebled from 2.5 billion in 1950 to 6.7 billion last month.

    I’m reminded of this by reading an article in today’s Observer. Deyan Sudjic writes about the current state of the city, and speculates about its future. As well as some positive data points, it also has some sobering passages:

    Cities bring out a lurking paranoia in some people. They see this explosive growth as a tide of slums engulfing the world. Certainly there is plenty to be worried about.

    Half of the 12 million people in Mumbai live in illegal shacks, 200,000 of them on the pavement. Every day, at least two people are killed falling off overcrowded suburban trains. In Mexico City, fewer than four workers in 10 have formal jobs, public transport is largely in the form of mafia-controlled minibuses, and taxis. The last mayor’s response was to build a second tier on the elevated motorway, to allow the rich to speed up their commuting time.

    Johannesburg, with its horrifying levels of violent crime, has seen the affluent quit the city centre for fortified enclaves on its boundaries. As a result, South Africa is leading the world in developing new security techniques for gated housing, built appropriately enough in the style of Tuscan hill towns. Private security is also a divisive a topic in north London where I live where the clatter of police helicopters has become routine. My neighbourhood divides between those who want to install barriers and gates to cut us off from the world outside and those who see such measures as the ultimate negation of what life in a city should be. Despite our anxieties, London is a safe city by world standards. The murder rate is 2.1 for every 100,000 inhabitants. In Johannesburg, it is nine times that figure and you are eight times as likely to be killed in a car crash there. 

    Of course, the article is also a puff-piece for the book that he co-edited being published next week: The Endless City. I’m definitely tempted to get it; perhaps it might shine a few rays of hope on my current feelings about city life. They seem to be closer to the views expressed by Mike Davis in his Planet of Slums.

    Leave a comment

  • Blue Brain and Deep Thought

    Seed Magazine has an interesting article on the Blue Brain project, which is using supercomputer technology to model the activity of biological brains. So far, the project team has managed to model the activity of a clump of about 10,000 neurons. While, theoretically, this can all be scaled up, I can’t help feeling that the project director, Henry Markram, woefully underestimates the difficulty if he believes, as he appears to, that he’ll be able to model a complete human brain in a single machine  in ten years or less. Moore’s Law states that computing power doubles about every two years. If that’s what Markram is putting his faith in, then it’s going to take a lot longer to go from modelling 10,000 neurons to one trillion at least 100 billion neurons than just ten years, more like 40 years…
     
    Nevertheless, I have no doubt that the team will be able to model simpler brain structures. And it will be fascinating to see if they can demonstrate evidence of the emergence of some form of consciousness. A necessary pre-cursor of this, it seems to me, is that the brain model must be exposed to external stimuli. A brain sealed into its own prison, cut off from everything, is unlikely (I think) to exhibit the emergent property of consciousness.
     
    And then there is the question of what happens if it does develop a consciousness, and then the team switches it off. Shades of "Daisy, daisy, give me your answer do…" (a reference to a scene from 2001 that I still find heartrending). Speaking of which, here’s another short extract from 2001 that also brought tears to my eyes, but for a different reason…
     
      
     
    (hat tip to the Richard Dawkins Net for the link – and the comments thread there makes for interesting reading as well)

    Leave a comment

  • Saluting The Flag

    I have to admit, Banksy is good.

    3 responses to “Saluting The Flag”

    1. Gelert Avatar
      Gelert

      He is yes.

    2. Robert Avatar
      Robert

      Very pretty.  Trouble is, the science behind the campaign is (as so often) bollocks – see here.  Tesco, it should be noted, pioneered biodegradable bags, so it isn’t even a fair cop.
       
      There’s plenty of literature comparing the life cycle energy and material use in the generation of disposable bags (if they are re-used as bin bags) compared to heavier duty re-usable ones.  It doesn’t look promising for any benefits from banning them.
       
      R.

    3. Geoff Avatar
      Geoff

      Er, what campaign, Robert? I’m only commenting on the image itself. I don’t see this as anything to do with plastic bags and their impact on the environment necessarily, more to do with the power of Tesco as a corporation.

    Leave a comment

  • Medhi Kazemi

    There’s a case currently rumbling through the Dutch legal system, and which is likely to reach the UK.
     
    An Iranian, Medhi Kazemi, currently being held in a Dutch Detention centre in Rotterdam, may be released for extradition to the UK. There, he will likely be returned to Iran. The most likely prognosis from that point forward is that he will be executed, by hanging, for being homosexual.
     
    Pontius Pilate, thy spirit lives on.

    One response to “Medhi Kazemi”

    1. Gelert Avatar
      Gelert

      Then sadly, he’s had it.
       
      I get tired of the government. There are so many people allowed to stay here for no good reason – economic migrants, those seeking a ‘better life’ – well fine. Bit if this man has done nothing wrong, why send him off to extinction in such a foul way?
       
      It pees me right off.

    Leave a comment

  • The Atheist’s Creed

    PZ Myers responded to a particularly stupid portrayal of an atheist by an artist with something that summed up my attitude to life perfectly. I give you:
     
    The Atheist’s Creed:
    I believe in time,
    matter, and energy,
    which make up the whole of the world.
     
    I believe in reason,
    evidence and the human mind,
    the only tools we have;
    they are the product of natural forces
    in a majestic but impersonal universe,
    grander and richer than we can imagine,
    a source of endless opportunities for discovery.
     
    I believe in the power of doubt;
    I do not seek out reassurances,
    but embrace the question,
    and strive to challenge my own beliefs.
     
    I accept human mortality.
    We have but one life,
    brief and full of struggle,
    leavened with love and community,
    learning and exploration,
    beauty and the creation of new life,
    new art, and new ideas.
     
    I rejoice in this life that I have,
    and in the grandeur of a world that preceded me,
    and an earth that will abide without me.  
    Damn, I think I may even have this read out at my funeral.
     
    Addendum: One of the comments on PZ’s piece quotes a statement from Madalyn Murray O’Hair, which I think is also of value:
    An Atheist loves himself and his fellow man instead of a god.
    An Atheist thinks that heaven is something for which we should work for now – here on earth- for all men together to enjoy.
    An Atheist accepts that he can get no help through prayer but that he must find in himself the inner conviction and strength to meet life, to grapple with it, subdue and enjoy it.
    An Atheist thinks that only in knowledge of himself and a knowledge of his fellow man can he find the understanding that will help to a life of fulfillment.
     
    Therefore, he seeks to know himself and his fellow man rather than to ‘know’ a god.
    An Atheist knows that a hospital should be built instead of a church.
    An Atheist knows that a deed must be done instead of a prayer said.
    An Atheist strives for involvement in life and not escape into death.
     
    He wants disease conquered, poverty vanquished, war eliminated. He wants man to understand and love man. He wants an ethical way of life. He knows that we cannot rely on a god nor channel action into prayer nor hope for an end of troubles in a hereafter. He knows that we are our brothers’ keepers in that we are, first, keepers of our lives; that we are responsible persons, that the job is here and the time is now."  
    What I find depressing is what happened to Madalyn Murray O’Hair. We humans are a species in need of much improvement. But the bottom line is that it is down to us, not to any mythical and supernatural god, to do it.
    The job is here and the time is now.
    Never was a truer sentence spoken.

    9 responses to “The Atheist’s Creed”

    1. Gelert Avatar
      Gelert

      That artists picture was the stupidest thing I ever saw. However, as I do point out to you, both sides present similar stupidities.
      The atheists prayer I actually agree with myself but for the ‘impersonal bit’, otherwise I’m with you all the way.
       
      The last bit,
      An Atheist loves himself and his fellow man instead of a god.    – why instead of? Why not both? see, that’s almost as silly.
       

      An Atheist thinks that heaven is something for which we should work for now – here on earth- for all men together to enjoy. – well, so do I.

      Therefore, he seeks to know himself and his fellow man rather than to ‘know’ a god.  – again, why not both?
      An Atheist knows that a hospital should be built instead of a church.                          – well, if it came to a choice, I agree of course
       
      An Atheist knows that a deed must be done instead of a prayer said.                        – prayer is not about asking or copping out, and deeds are what we are meant to do with it, not sit on our butts praying to the ceiling.
       
      An Atheist strives for involvement in life and not escape into death.   – so does the believer.
       
      For Pete’s sake, there is so much misinformation and bollocks from both sides here. Don’t we already have enough of that?
       
      Pardon me, I’m in no mood for pussyfooting tonight, though that’s what I’ve been trained to do – pussyfoot, appease, not upset, not disagree with. Tonight, I’m not in the mood.
       
       
       

    2. Geoff Avatar
      Geoff

      Gelert, glad you’re not in the mood for pussyfooting 🙂
       
      You write: "An Atheist loves himself and his fellow man instead of a god.    – why instead of? Why not both? see, that’s almost as silly". Erm, what part of the definition of an atheist do you not understand? If a person believes in a god then that person, by definition, ain’t an atheist. Sheesh! Likewise for the "impersonal universe" – if it’s anything else, then the person characterising the universe as "impersonal" can’t be an atheist. Although, as an aside, I do wonder whether a deist might still characterise the universe as "impersonal" given that the deist believes in a non-onterventional god?
       
      Miaouw!
       

    3. Geoff Avatar
      Geoff

      Oh, and I think the point of O’Hair’s statement was to attempt to redress the perception, particularly strong in the US, that atheists are amoral, and not worthy of US citizenship (thank you, George Bush Sr.). You did read that quote from Life magazine that O’Hair became "the most hated woman in America", right? The whole point is that we can hope, dream, and act out moral lives without the need of belief in a god…

    4. Gelert Avatar
      Gelert

      I’ve not made myself clear – something I seem to have elevated to an artform –
       
      ‘An Atheist loves himself and his fellow man instead of a god.’    – why instead of?     – I meant – why should a THEIST not be able to do both? The suggestion in the line above is that where atheists love their fellow man INSTEAD of God, that therefore  a Theist must love God INSTEAD of his fellow man. My question was, why should you have to love one instead of the other, why not both?
       
      I’m even less in the mood for pussyfooting today.

    5. Gelert Avatar
      Gelert

      and the impersonal was from my viewpoint, not assuming an atheist would, obviously.
       
      As for the defense against atheists being amoral etc – that too is clear bullspoop – just from my side of the fence not yours.
       
      I of course agree we can all live out our lives in hopes, dreams, and morally without God – of course we can – I don’t believe in God because I have a need for ‘him’ or because ‘he’ is needful for me to do these things.  Sometimes I’d like to bash the stubborn heads of the end spectrum of both sides of this debate together and let them count the resulting stars.

    6. Geoff Avatar
      Geoff

      Gelert, aah, OK I now understand the point you were making. I can see why you would rail against the implication that "therefore  a Theist must love God INSTEAD of his fellow man", and indeed it is a valid interpretation. I would just submit that it is probable that, given the circumstances, O’Hair probably came across lots of instances where the valid interpretation was that theists, by their actions, were actively demonstrating their love for god at the expense of their fellow men. Lord knows, I see a lot of it about still today.
       
      And I still can’t get my head around why you are a theist. It really would be helpful if you were to put forth some of the rationale that lies behind it. And honestly, if your response is that you have faith, then I think there is no further discussion possible (he said, in as friendly a tone as he could muster).

    7. Brian Avatar
      Brian

      if your response is that you have faith, then I think there is no further discussion possible  Drb.oynfw I.ruu frg er frg abe I.n.py a ecoo.pkcj. ,cyd yday oya.m.byv  <df co rb bry lroocxn. yr dak. a jrbk.poaycrb ,cyd orm.rb. ,dr aed.p.o yr uacyd rb yday k.pf ogxh.jyZ  C-m ogp. .k.b Ea,tcbo ece ydayv  Cb abf jao.v I.n.py-o mcbe co ,rpyd ecllcbi frgp yr.o cbyr yday ,ay.pv

    8. Geoff Avatar
      Geoff

      Pity, I had hoped for more.

    Leave a comment

  • Just The Facts

    There was an interesting interview with James Lovelock in last weekend’s Guardian. His message about climate change is: "Enjoy life while you can. Because if you’re lucky, it’s going to be 20 years before it hits the fan".
     
    I rather think he’s right about this no-nonsense message. Unsurprisingly, not everyone agrees. Here’s Leo Hickman telling James Lovelock to lighten up. Unfortunately, I think Hickman is the one with his head in the sand, wanting to have false hope.

    Leave a comment

  • Flattery

    This almost makes me want to immerse myself in Battlestar Galactica. I say almost, because I fell in love with Serenity first.

    Leave a comment

  • The Purpose

    The barmaid may be right about the purpose of having a debate, but the "truth" lies elesewhere…

    Leave a comment

  • BioEnergy

    BLDBLOG reports on the use of manure as an energy source. Around here, it probably makes a lot of sense.

    Leave a comment

  • White

    BBC2 starts a series of programmes this weekend themed around the white working class of Britain. Judging from the trailers, it strikes me as a particularly crass wallow in imagined victimhood. Justin, over at Chicken Yoghurt, sums up my feelings of distaste very well indeed.

    Leave a comment

  • Teleportation and the Branch Line

    Here’s a nice little animation that explores some of the philosophical questions behind teleportation.
     
     
     
    If you want to explore them further, then the philosopher Derek Parfit devotes six chapters of his book, Reasons and Persons, to questions of personal identity, and uses the teleportation thought-experiment, and others, in a variety of ways to illuminate and entertain. 

    Leave a comment

  • Phun

    It looks like Crayon Physics Deluxe, which I mentioned last month, has a rival: Phun.
     
     
     
    Phun can be downloaded here.
     
    (hat tip to Ben Goldacre, over at Bad Science)

    2 responses to “Phun”

    1. Gelert Avatar
      Gelert

      Which do you prefer the look of? The other one seemed to have a fixed purpose, but this one looks more fun.

    2. Geoff Avatar
      Geoff

      I’d like to try them both out before deciding. Phun seems to have its property menus constantly on-screen, which seems a little cluttered to me…

    Leave a comment

  • Captain Disillusion

    I’ve only just stumbled across this series of videos by someone who calls himself Captain Disillusion. They are very well done. Here, for example is the debunking of the "Man on Mars" story from a couple of months ago. I particularly like the moment where he confounds our assumptions about his makeup.
     
     

    Leave a comment

  • Booklore

    When I joined LibraryThing, back in 2005, I was somewhat chuffed to see that I was in the top 50 of members who had the biggest library. Now that LibraryThing has over 368,000 members, it comes as no surprise that my ranking has fallen to 875 (currently). What I do find staggering is that the leader of the pack currently has 43,680 books in his library. I find it difficult enough to find time to read all of my 2,350 books as it is…
     
    LibraryThing continues to go from strength to strength. It’s just introduced LibraryThing Local, which gives book-related information about the neighbourhood. In less than a week since it’s been introduced, members have added nearly 6,000 venues.

    4 responses to “Booklore”

    1. Cicero Avatar
      Cicero

      Wow, almost 44,000 books! Perhaps the person has read all of them. I wonder if they are as we speak cataloging them?
      What id tthe bulk of your own reading, are there any series of books you have yourself? What is the genre of most of the books you’ve collected?
      I’ve taken a look at the site you mentioned, thanks for the info btw. I may start to catalogue some of my own on the site – I think the site also allows for one to search for books they might be after.
      Cicero
       
       
       
       

    2. Geoff Avatar
      Geoff

      Cicero, you ask what is the genre of most of the books that I’ve collected… One view of this can easily be seen from my Tag Cloud. As for series, then perhaps an inkling of this is given by my Author Tag Cloud. Of course, what these Tag Clouds miss is any sense of how my collection has developed over the years. For that, you would have to look at my acquisitions in date order, which, unfortunately, LibraryThing has not catered for until recently, and I haven’t had time to go back and retrospectively add in this data. 

    3. Gelert Avatar
      Gelert

      Glad to see Glen Baxter in there Geoff – always a good sign.

    4. Geoff Avatar
      Geoff

      Ah, yes, his surreal humour. Example, the two grizzled cowboys on horseback, the caption being: "’To me, the window is still a symbolically loaded motif’, drawled Cody".

    Leave a comment

  • Obfuscating Archbishops

    I see Ophelia is raising an eyebrow here and here at the fact that Archbishops Williams and Sentamu seem to be changing their minds about not resisting the repeal of the UK’s blasphemy laws. I can’t say I blame her. Their letter to Hazel Blears indeed makes interesting reading. Just for fun, I also measured its readability, by using the Flesch Reading Ease index. It scores 36.8. Roughly speaking, on the Flesch Reading Ease scale, 0 is completely incomprehensible and 100 is perfectly readable. So with a score of 36.8, they could try a little harder to make their point clearer. Mind you, this is far better than Archbishop Williams previous effort. I found that his "Sharia" speech to the Royal Courts of Justice scored a miserable 19.2. No wonder he complained about being misunderstood. 

    One response to “Obfuscating Archbishops”

    1. […] his writing a bit of a struggle to comprehend. A clear writer he is not. I sometimes amuse myself by putting his prose through the reading comprehension tester in Microsoft Word. Inevitably it will rate the text as being difficult to […]

    Leave a comment

  • National Treasure

    There’s an excellent article in today’s Guardian that illustrates nicely why Sir David Attenborough is a National Treasure. The article is both a eulogy for Sir David and an elegy for a vanished world.

    Leave a comment