Reflections on life at “De Witte Wand”…

  • Blame The Gays

    John Sheehan – doesn’t it just make you proud that he was a senior figure in the US military?

    Leave a comment

  • Tell It To The Judge

    Johann Hari hits the nail on the head, as usual…

    Leave a comment

  • The Baker’s Wife

    We had a bit of a shock last week. On Thursday evening, we saw that there were two ambulances with flashing lights at Bennie the baker on the corner. The following morning we learned that his wife, Ineke, had collapsed. She had been rushed to hospital in one of the ambulances, but they failed to resuscitate her, and she died. She was only two years older than me, and she had seemed in perfect health to everyone.

    Last Saturday evening, Martin joined other neighbours at Bennie’s to plan for the funeral. It’s tradition here that at the funeral, the coffin is carried in by representatives of the buurt (neighbourhood). As a result, I was to be one of the six coffin-bearers at her funeral. I was honoured to be able to do so.

    Last night people were able to offer their condolences to the family and make their farewells to Ineke at Bennie’s, and two hundred and fifty people turned up. The bakery is something of an institution around these parts. It was begun in the 1930s by Bennie’s father, and Bennie and Ineke carried on the tradition. Bennie baked and Ineke served in the shop. She was always ready with a smile and a laugh, and she loved to gossip. In fact, she was the epicentre of all the gossip that went on around here. The best way to spread news without any effort was to mention it to Ineke.

    Today was the funeral. Bennie and the family did her proud. Her coffin was borne to the church in a traditional hearse drawn by two jet-black Friesian horses; beautiful animals with black plumes on their heads. Three representatives of the neighbourhood, and we six coffin-bearers, in dark suits with black capes, walked in front of the hearse for part of the 3 kilometre route to the church, where we transferred the coffin into the church. The church was packed, once again reflecting how much she was known and liked, and how much of a shock her sudden death has been. After the service, we carried the coffin back out to the hearse and set off to the graveyard, where we transferred it to its final resting place.

    As I say, it was an honour to be chosen as one of the six bearers. But I wish that it hadn’t taken the death of Ineke to bring it about. She will be missed.

    One response to “The Baker’s Wife”

    1. Bal Avatar
      Bal

      Awww Geoff I am sorry to hear your sad news xxx but at least Ineke was fondly remembered and had a good passage to her resting place xxx

    Leave a comment

  • A Plug for a Plug

    Bloody brilliant. One of those "why didn’t I think of that?" moments. I hope Min-Kyu Choi makes a fortune.

    One response to “A Plug for a Plug”

    1. […] couple of years back, I wrote about Min-Kyu Choi’s brilliant idea for a folding plug. I see that the design is now more than a concept, and is now an actual product. It’s a pity that […]

    Leave a comment

  • Pseudo-Metaphysics

    Massimo Pigliucci has a post over at Rationally Speaking that reminds me how easily I get irritated by pseudo-scientific waffle with a metaphysical slant. And I really get irate when it’s uttered by people who should know better. Pigliucci quotes the physicist Paul Davies as an example of a generator of metaphysical waffle, and I agree with the assessment. I was watching the BBC’s The Sky at Night special on "Life" last week and Davies was being interviewed. It was all I could do to refrain from picking up the TV and hurling it through the window. Templeton prize-winning stuff and nonsense.

    Leave a comment

  • Hiatus

    Sorry, it’s been a while since I’ve posted a blog entry here. It’s partly out of being distracted with other things, and partly because I really have no wish to release a stream of bile on the things that have been happening in the wider world that merely seem to feed my misanthropy. Things and persons such as Geert Wilders, Tony Blair and religious authorities, to name but a few.
     
    Then there are the cries for help over which I don’t quite know whether to sympathise or to tell the persons involved to get a grip.
     
    But, life goes on, Spring is coming, so I will try to be more diligent about putting down my trivia on a more regular basis. As it happens, something occurred last week that is far from trivial for the neighbourhood, but the description thereof will have to wait for a few days until I have managed to collect my thoughts about it.

    4 responses to “Hiatus”

    1. Brian Avatar
      Brian

      The whole issue with His Vacancy, Pope Rats-Arse, and his minions has me steaming!

    2. Geoff Avatar
      Geoff

      Brian, it’s been going on for years, so I can’t say I’m entirely surprised. It’s what you are likely to get with the institution and the priesthood set up the way it is.

    3. Geoff Avatar
      Geoff

      Then again, Hitchens is probably closest to the mark when he describes the stench of evil that is currently being sniffed:http://www.slate.com/id/2247861/pagenum/all/

    Leave a comment

  • Whoops – A Mass Misunderstanding

    The Catholic tradition of Carnival and the Catholic tradition of Mass look to be on collision course in Den Bosch tomorrow:
    A priest’s refusal to grant communion to a gay man has led to uproar in the Catholic south of the Netherlands. A multitude of gay men now look set to descend on Sunday mass in the city of Den Bosch.
    Can’t wait.
     

    Leave a comment

  • Funding the Pursuit of Bullshit

    Ophelia, accurate as always. Is Mooney’s prize the 21st Century equivalent of the thirty pieces of silver?

    Leave a comment

  • The Symphony of Science – Part V

    Another installment of the Symphony of Science. This one proving that, although it’s amazing technology, even Auto-tune can’t make Professor Dawkins sing…
     
     

    Leave a comment

  • Seeing Is Believing

    My dad always used Old Spice, but I don’t recall this ever happening to him. Nicely done special effects – most of them simple mechanics. Only the hand with the diamonds has been superimposed on the single take in this commercial. Mind you, it took three days and dozens of attempts before everything worked.
     
     

    2 responses to “Seeing Is Believing”

    1. Lesley Avatar
      Lesley

      I love this ad – forget the Old Spice, where can I buy the man????

    2. Geoff Avatar
      Geoff

      Ah, Lesley, he’s gorgeous, but it’s an ad – all is illusion, smoke and mirrors… He’s not for sale…

    Leave a comment

  • Murder in Samarkand

    Quick, you have (as of 21 Feb 2010) six days left to listen to something that you need to hear.

    Leave a comment

  • Dying in Increments

    A phrase from a piece in Esquire about Roger Ebert, the film critic. Once you get past that amazing, arresting portrait image, the picture it paints of Ebert is wonderful. Worth reading.

    Leave a comment

  • Which Web Animal Are You?

    The BBC has been running a series of programs on the effects of the internet and the World Wide Web on society called The Virtual Revolution. Fronted by Aleks Krotoski, it’s been a relatively good exploration of both the history and the societal effects of the Web. The fourth, and final, programme of the series looked at the societal impact of the web in more detail. It contained the inevitable soundbite from Baroness Greenfield expressing concerns about the negative impact on the brains of our youth, but this was rather nicely called “an extreme position” by Krotoski. The point is that there’s really little evidence either way – just plenty of anecdotes.

    To try and address this lack of research, the BBC joined forces with Professor David Nicolas, head of the CIBER research group at University College London and Professor Clifford Nass of Stanford University. A Web Behaviour Test has been launched in order to try and gather more data. The professors propose that there are eight different archetypes of people who interact with the web, and have defined their characteristics in terms of animals (fox, hedgehog, etc.). If you take the test, you will be shown which archetype of web user you are. Apparently, I’m a bear:

    bear

    Slow-moving – Web Bears browse the internet at a leisurely pace – just like real world bears who like to take their time over things.

    Solitary – Like real bears, Web Bears tend to be solitary animals. My results show that when I am looking for information, I am less likely to use social networks or other sites whose content is created by its users, preferring instead to go it alone.

    Adaptable – Web Bears are highly adaptable multitaskers, able to do several things at the same time. Real-bears are also very flexible, particularly in their diet, and will eat fish, insects, salmon and even scavenge in human refuse for new sources of food.

    I’m not sure about the eating insects bit, or scavenging in human refuse, mind.

    2 responses to “Which Web Animal Are You?”

    1. ROBERT Avatar
      ROBERT

      People are different…..people make airfix kit’s differently…people compose Music differently…so people ae going to use the internet differently…so what’s new ? And the point of this test is..??

    2. Geoff Avatar
      Geoff

      Simply to provide data. Real data is better than anecdote. If it were not so, then we’d all be thinking that astrology and homeopathy actually work…

    Leave a comment

  • Fun With Technology – Part V

    Here we go again, another trawl through the depths of technology. My problem is that I never could learn when to leave well enough alone; there are always a few niggles that will bother me, and usually I find that picking at them is like picking at a thread on my pullover, only to find that the pullover is starting to unravel.

    In this case, the starting point is that I currently have a fairly reasonable home cinema setup – nothing too fancy, such as these – but for the most part it works, and more importantly, the spouse acceptance factor is reasonably good (although we are currently juggling six remote control units, which really doesn’t help).

    However, it has a niggle.

    When the Blu-ray player (Panasonic DMP-BD30), the audio amplifier (Denon AVR-3808) and the HDTV (Panasonic TX-37LZD800) are first switched on, it can take up to three or four minutes before I see a stable picture on the TV. The three components are connected together using HDMI interfaces, supposedly the latest and greatest technology for interconnecting audio-visual equipment. Any two of the components will work perfectly together with each other, but add the third into the chain, and the problems begin. The three of them are obviously engaged in some form of electronic pass-the-parcel; trying to decide on what level of communication will form common ground to get a DVD or Blu-Ray disc in the player displayed properly on the TV. The picture will appear momentarily before it breaks up into a multi-coloured snowstorm, and the units start over again, trying some other set of parameters to forge the chain. This continues, as I’ve said, for up to three or four minutes at a time. I’ve tried every conceivable combination of the setup possibilities in all three components in order to find a suitable starting point, all to no avail. All the units are supposed to support the same level of the HDMI specification (1.3A), but I fear that there’s many a slip ‘twixt cup and lip – someone, somewhere, deep in the engineering departments of the companies concerned has interpreted the HDMI specification differently from his or her colleagues, and the resulting implementation doesn’t quite work properly.

    I had rather naively hoped that a firmware fix would emerge that would cure the problem, but alas, despite several iterations of firmware upgrades on all components, nothing has appeared to resolve this. And now we are at a stage where some of the equipment is positively ancient by today’s standards – the Blu-Ray player was released in November 2007, which apparently makes it geriatric in this particular technology area. So I don’t really expect any further upgrades to appear, hence the chances that the problem will ever be resolved are slim, as far as I can see.

    Thus, that is the niggle. And I am pulling on its thread by wondering whether I should change one of the components. The Blu-Ray player is the most obvious candidate – it is the least expensive component (comparatively speaking), and has already been shuffled off, by its makers, to the equivalent of the Old Folk’s Home. Now, I could simply replace it with a newer model of Blu-Ray player, but you know me, as Mrs. Lovett said, sometimes these ideas just pop into my head… What if, instead of a Blu-Ray player, I put in an HTPC? I must admit, I do rather like the features, and the look, of the latest iteration of the Windows Media Center software that is bundled with Windows 7. And it integrates with our Windows Home Server, which is storing all our music and photos. As an experiment, I hauled my PC out of the study, and temporarily hooked it up, using HDMI, in place of the Blu-Ray player. Sure enough, I was able to use it as an HTPC, and successfully demonstrated that it was able to play DVD and Blu-Ray discs through the home cinema setup, as well as access music and photos on the Windows Home Server. The only drawback was that the audio was only 2 channel stereo, instead of 7.1 channels, but that is a limitation of the hardware I currently have in the PC. What I also observed was that there was no protracted electronic “pass-the-parcel” – the setup between the three devices appeared instantaneous.

    So, in theory, an HTPC is a real possibility. OK, let’s pull on the thread a little more – what sort of HTPC should it be? A number of possibilities spring to mind: an off-the-shelf HTPC, such as the Dell Zino HD or the Mac Mini; or a home-built HTPC.

    I must admit, the design of both the Dell Zino HD and the Mac Mini is appealing, but the real question is: are they up to the job of acting as a proper HTPC?

    Let’s take the Mac Mini first. I’m not really convinced that this would be the right choice for me. First, Apple’s bundled media library software for HTPC functionality, Front Row, doesn’t seem to be nearly as polished as Microsoft’s Windows Media Center. Secondly, I’ve never liked the iTunes software or the service for a variety of reasons, and I don’t think I’m likely to change my mind now. Thirdly, at the moment, the Mac Mini is only available with a DVD player, not a Blu-Ray player, which kind of defeats the whole object of the exercise. It also doesn’t have an HDMI interface. The final nail in the coffin is cost: Apple gear always comes at a premium, and the Mac Mini is no exception. Let’s move swiftly on before this degenerates into a rant about the Apple religion.

    The Dell Zino HD is an interesting box. It can be configured in a variety of ways, including with a built-in Blu-Ray player, so this seems as though it could be a possibility. Once I started to look into it though, I began to have my doubts. It only comes with the 64bit version of Windows 7, which, frankly, strikes me as overkill for an HTPC. I found one enthusiast who had tried using the Zino as an HTPC, but then I found out that he’d wiped off the Dell software and done a clean install of the 32bit version of Windows 7 for the systems that he eventually bought. There’s a thread about the Zino on the AVSForum – it’s extremely active, with over 4,100 posts and counting. I can’t say that the overall impression that I get is positive. I think that what it boils down to is to get your expectations set correctly. Despite what Dell marketing might imply, this does not strike me as an HTPC out of the box. It may be a good basic PC with a small form factor (like the Mac Mini), but getting it to work flawlessly as an HTPC requires careful tweaking of software. It can be done, but most people just want to plug and play. That is unlikely to happen, at least with the current state of hardware and software. I am mildly amused by the volume of posts on the forum that say “do this”, followed by an answering chorus of “no, don’t do that, do this…” A sure sign that the technology is not yet ready for primetime. Anyway, the bottom line for me at least is that the Zino doesn’t (at least at the moment) output Dolby TrueHD or DTS-MA bitstreams, which is what my current (and geriatric) Blu-Ray player can do. Add to that the fact that I’m looking at around €800 for a system that needs further improvement, and I think, no, not for me.

    So, in that case, why not go the whole hog and build an HTPC from scratch? Well, I can certainly do this, there’s no shortage of advice (and it must be said, the inevitable choruses of “do this” and “no, don’t do that, do this”). The bottom line is that I think I can build a top-flight HTPC that is whisper-quiet for around €650. Will I go ahead? Mmm, I think I need to mull this over for a while…

    2 responses to “Fun With Technology – Part V”

    1. […] six weeks ago, I wrote about the idiosyncrasies of the technology that makes up our Home Cinema setup, and wondered whether I should take the plunge and build my own HTPC. As I like building my own […]

    2. […] AVR, and eight B&W loudspeakers for our first Home Cinema system. This worked pretty well, but there were niggles. A couple of years later, these niggles grew in importance to the point where I decided to replace […]

    Leave a comment

  • Happy Valentine’s Day

    And following from the last post on Chatroulette, how could I resist this wonderful post about vintage sex toys from the Kinsey Institute? Ain’t humanity wonderful?
     
     

    Leave a comment

  • You Don’t Say?

    So Chatroulette is the latest fad. I freely admit that I haven’t been brazen enough to hit "Play" yet, unlike Jason Kottke.
     
    I note, with a sense of irony, that the Chatroulette start page says:
    "Chatroulette does not tolerate broadcasting obscene, offending, pornographic material and and we will have to block users who violate these rules from using our service".
    Somehow, I can’t help feeling that that is precisely what is driving the curiousity of most of the evolved apes who are visiting this site…

    4 responses to “You Don’t Say?”

    1. Brian Avatar
      Brian

      I went on and trained my cam on my dog. The reactions were hysterical, even the wankers stopped mid-stroke.

    2. Geoff Avatar
      Geoff

      So, what, precisely, was Monty doing? On second thoughts, perhaps I don’t wish to know…

    3. Brian Avatar
      Brian

      Sleeping, he’s a dog, not a pervert!

    4. Geoff Avatar
      Geoff

      Hmm, perhaps so, but when I look at what Watson’s practising with his stuffed bear, then I have to wonder what goes through the mind of a dog…

    Leave a comment

  • Puberty Looms

    Living with him every day as we do, it is sometimes hard to realise just how quickly our Labrador puppy, Watson, is growing. It’s just over four months since we took him home from the kennel, and then he weighed 3 Kg.

    20090930-1603-12

    Now he’s up to 20 Kg, and giving Kai a run for his money.

    20100212-1501-24

    Puberty looms. God help us.

    20100212-1504-06

    Leave a comment

  • Flame Warriors

    Thanks to Jeff Atwood, over at Coding Horror, I’ve just learned about Mike Reed’s roster of Flame Warriors – a site that describes the various archetypes who populate the internet. I rather suspect that I’m Tiny Yapper – which one are you?

    Leave a comment

  • Uneasy Bedfellows

    I sense that the spirit of Mandy Rice-Davies is with me tonight. My immediate response to the Synod’s passing of the motion that belief in Religion and Science are compatible was to think: “well, they would, wouldn’t they?”

    I can’t say that I blame them, like Sisyphus, for trying, but really, in this day and age, the mantra of NOMA is wearing a trifle thin. And it doesn’t help when a delegate, Philip Brown of Manchester, says: "Science can only explain how something was created; religion can explain why."

    Oh dear, oh dear, oh dear.

    What I found really intriguing is that the vote was 241 in favour of the motion versus 2 against. I’d like to hear more from those two…

    Leave a comment

  • The Big Question

    Richard Wiseman has posted a thought experiment linked to polls for pet owners, one for cat owners and one for dog owners. The thought experiment is this:
    Imagine walking into a room and finding your beloved dog or cat, and a randomly selected two year old child that you have never seen before.  You are presented with a simple choice.  You have to press one of three buttons.  One button will instantly kill your pet.  The second button will instantly kill the child and the third button will instantly kill you. No-one will ever know which button you pressed and there will be no legal ramifications for your choice.  Answer honestly – which button would you press?
    Looking at the results, I am frankly amazed at how many pet owners would rather kill the child than their beloved pet (around one third at the moment). As for me, my answer would depend on additional factors. As a dog owner, for the most part I would unhesitatingly choose to kill my dog.
     

    But I could also imagine a circumstance where I would choose active euthanasia, and kill myself. After all, Wiseman’s said that the death is instant. Sounds to me like a good way to go, if I were ready to die…

    The kid survives in both scenarios…

    On a related note, Philip Ball comments on a new paper from psychologists Ilkka Pyysiäinen of the University of Helsinki and Marc Hauser at Harvard. The paper draws on the results from the Moral Sense Test and points out that individuals presented with unfamiliar moral dilemmas show no difference in their responses if they have a religious background or not, although religion may influence responses in a few highly specific cases.

    Oh, and harking back to the experiment that kicked this off, I’ve always found the phrase "cat owner" to be faintly oxymoronic. As someone said: "dogs have owners, cats have staff".

    Leave a comment