Reflections on life at “De Witte Wand”…

  • Intricate Processes of Fantastic Horror

    In the novel, The Midwich Cuckoos, by John Wyndham, one of the characters, Gordon Zellaby, says:

    “I wonder if a sillier and more ignorant catachresis than “Mother Nature” was ever perpetuated? It  is because nature is ruthless, hideous, and cruel beyond belief that it was necessary to invent civilization. One thinks of wild animals as savage but the fiercest of them begins to look almost domesticated when one considers the viciousness required of a survivor in the sea; as for the insects, their lives are sustained only by intricate processes of fantastic horror.” 

    Using that as a springboard, Kij Johnson has penned a page of unsettling ruminations: Mantis Wives.

    Eerie, disturbing, and practically factual descriptions of the sex lives of the Mantis.

    2 responses to “Intricate Processes of Fantastic Horror”

    1. Matt Healy Avatar
      Matt Healy

      John Wyndham: classic SF writer of the 1950s and 1960s! Day of the Triffids & The Kraken Wakes are both well worth reading; I’ve not read the novel you mention.

      1. Geoff Coupe Avatar

        Matt, “Midwich Cuckoos” was also made into a 1960 British horror film: “Village of the Damned”. Not a bad little film, and apparently better than the 1995 remake by John Carpenter (which I haven’t seen).

    Leave a comment

  • The Perseids

    The Perseid meteor swarm reached its annual maximum at around 14:00 yesterday afternoon (local time) on the 12th August. That meant that for the past couple of nights (and hopefully tonight) the chances of seeing a meteor streak across the sky have been substantially increased.

    So far, I’ve had a couple of attempts at observing. I was out at 04:00 on the 12th (I couldn’t sleep), and I did see many meteors. However, I was singularly unsuccessful at capturing any of them with my camera.

    Last night, I tried again at about 00:30 for an hour or so. It seemed to me that the rate of meteors had fallen away considerably from the night before, but I did manage to capture one with my camera. It’s not a very good photo, but it does show Ursa Major (the Plough) over the house, with a Perseid streaking in from the right of the frame.

    20120813-0129-25

    Leave a comment

  • Fun and Games With WHS 2011

    Despite some quirks and shortcomings, my Windows Home Server system has been quietly backing itself up onto a pair of hard drives that I rotate to an off-site location.

    But four days ago, the server backups started failing. The error being reported was “There is not enough space on the disk”. This was being reported for both the G: and the D: drives on my system.

    WHS2011 106

    Well, I could understand that being the case for the G: drive, since that had filled up with data leaving only 60 GB free on a 1 TB drive. However, the D: drive had nearly 385 GB free on a 405 GB drive.

    I wondered whether in fact the disk being referred to was not the data disk, but the backup disk, WHS Data Backup #1, which only had a few GB free. WHS 2011 is supposed to purge old backups from the backup drives when they get full, but there seems to be no way to predict when it will do this – I’ve had backup drives bob along for months with only a few GB free.

    I tried a few more server backups, but as you can see from the screenshot, they were all unsuccessful. I also swapped the backup drive for a second drive (WHS Server Backup #2b), but as you can see, server backups still weren’t working.

    I began to wonder whether it was data drive G: being almost full that was triggering the failure, so I moved one of the Shared Folders from the G: drive to the J: drive. Unlike WHS v1, WHS 2011 does not have drive pooling, so you have to manage the storage as a bunch of separate drives.

    Once I’d moved the Folder across to the J: drive (using the “Move the Folder” task in the WHS 2011 Dashboard), the G: drive now had 248 GB of free space, while the J: drive now had 714 GB of free space.

    I tried another server backup. This was also unsuccessful, with an “Element not found” error (whatever that means) being reported on the J: drive.

    WHS2011 107

    I left the system running and waited to see whether the next scheduled backup (at 23:00) would work. That was also reported as unsuccessful, with all drives reporting a “The operation failed because another operation was in progress. Retry the operation” error.

    WHS2011 110

    Trying not to panic, I rebooted the system and tried one more time. Now I got a “The handle is invalid” error on all drives. Another mysterious and opaque message.

    WHS2011 108

    Finally, in desperation, I told WHS 2011 to remove the WHS Data Backup #1 drive from the server backup definition, and added it back as though it was a totally new backup drive. WHS 2011 formatted it, and I gave it the name of WHS Backup Disc #1a.

    The next time server backup ran, the backup was successful. Phew!

    WHS2011 109

    I suspect I’m going to have to reformat the second backup drive, and add it back into the server backup task as a new drive.

    I think things are back to normal again, but I have to confess that this little episode has shaken my confidence in WHS 2011 a bit.

    11 responses to “Fun and Games With WHS 2011”

    1. Jeremy Stevens Avatar
      Jeremy Stevens

      I have also had numerous odd issues with WHS 2011. However, it has been on the client end. A reload of the computer that was not backing up resolved the issue…. I am not sure, if the backup agent was the cause, or what. I know its not the exact same as your issue, but I wanted to give you a shout out, seeing how I have had issues with backups. The errors are so effing vague, that it really leaves you scratching your head, more than you were, before you look into the error… I know in the States, WHS is/was selling very cheaply. Last I seen it, it was $49. I paid $120 for WHS v1 in 2010, two years after its release…. I think MS (Not excusing, just an observation) when putting this together, about half way through develaopent, changed their minds on Home Servers complete, and decided to ship everything to the “cloud”. Probably not a bad idea, for the average consumer, but I have over 3 TB of data that I would have to pay thousands of dollars a month for storage, let alone bandwitdth cost. I suppose I could just put a full server together, and go that route in the near future……

    2. Jeremy Stevens Avatar
      Jeremy Stevens

      Pardon my missplelings, and horrible grammer please…..

    3. Greg Mickel Avatar
      Greg Mickel

      I have had extensive file and data experience with WHS 2011 and I have had the same problems with the server backup deletion system. It doesn’t work right! I just format my drives and goes a new. It should do it automatically and mine did at one time but it stopped. I have never gotten a answer from Micro-who on the issue. All we can do is try.

    4. Peter Ferguson Avatar
      Peter Ferguson

      Same problem here today. My 1TB HD for server backup is nearly full. So from what you have said all I can do is reformat and start again?

      1. Geoff Coupe Avatar

        Peter, indeed, I think that’s the only option. I have the strong suspicion that since installing Rollup 3, the Server Backup function does not purge old backups automatically any more, or if it does, it’s not working as effectively as it did prior to the Rollup.

        The data that I backup using the Server Backup has grown to such an extent that it will fill up the 1TB drives that I was using in less than a week. Earlier this year (i.e. prior to Rollup 3), even when there was only a couple of GB free on the backup drives, the Server Backup would complete, and it looked as though it was purging old backups automatically. Now it will simply fail with the errors shown above.

        Rather than reformat the backup drives on a weekly basis, I’ve invested in a couple of 2TB drives for the Server Backup. This should mean that I’ll be able to carry on for some time before the drives get full. I’ll be interested to see if WHS will automatically purge old backups from these larger drives, or whether once they are full, I will have to go through the reformat route again…

        1. Peter Ferguson Avatar
          Peter Ferguson

          Geoff,
          I have 39 GB left on my 1TB disk. I will do nothing and see what happens. It reports Server backup completed successfully. I think I am set at 2 per day as I recall. I will keep you informed.
          Peter

          1. Peter Ferguson Avatar
            Peter Ferguson

            Geoff,
            WHS 2011 tells me I now have 2.7GB left.
            “I hate to rain on you parade”.
            I love your turn of phrase but well you are English. I am “Smithkid” on “wegotserved” that you kindly replied to. My problem is that although WHS 2011 tells me my server backup is “successful” every day, I cannot tell if this so because any drive designated as a server backup cannot to be seen from the Dashboard. However if I open a remote desktop connection I can see the drive in explorer. I note that files are being added everyday. I will take note of the oldest files on the drive and see if they are being deleted.

            I have added a third hard drive to my server and can remove the drive that is full as the server backup and replace it with the new drive. Then rotate them in and out as they fill (and delete them) but it would be nice to know exactly what is happening to to the “full” drive.

            1. Geoff Coupe Avatar

              Peter,

              You write: “any drive designated as a server backup cannot [to] be seen from the Dashboard”.

              That’s a bit odd, because you should be able to see drives designated as Server Backup drives under the Hard Drives tab on the Server Folders and Hard Drives window in the Dashboard. You should see a list of your OS and data drives at the top of the pane, followed by a list of the Server Backup drives that are currently mounted below that. Entries for the Server Backup drives will also list the capacity, used spaces and free space, just like the OS and data drive entries.

              Are you not seeing this?

              1. Peter Ferguson Avatar
                Peter Ferguson

                Sorry, did not make myself clear.
                I meant you cannot see the files on the server backup drive. I am trying to workout what happens at each serve backup instance now that it is full. Are older files being deleted as new ones are added. I have taken a snapshot of the file contents and will check tomorrow to see what has changed.

                1. Geoff Coupe Avatar

                  Ah, OK, but I’m also confused when you say that “you can see the files in Explorer” via RDP. On my system, the drive does NOT show up in Explorer. That’s because, under normal circumstances, it’s a VHD format drive that is never mounted to be shown in Explorer. I can see the physical disc in the Server Manager Disk Management screen, and I can see the backups in the Server Manager Windows Server Backup screens, but that’s it.

                  1. Peter Ferguson Avatar
                    Peter Ferguson

                    Geoff,
                    You are right again. It’s morning here now and I had a little wine last night (Pinot from Tasmania). I was looking at the client backup not the server backup which we now both agree cannot be seen when mounted as “the” server backup. So I am back to the position where I can only assume that what is happening is that older files are being delete when a new backup is performed. I am going to add another HD as a server backup, demount the first and see what happens!!!!!!!!

    Leave a comment

  • Curiosity Rover and Usain Bolt

    Yesterday, a man ran 100 metres in 9.63 seconds. This morning, a robot laboratory successfully landed on Mars and will begin its search for evidence that life may also have existed on a neighbouring planet.

    Of these two stories, it’s the second that makes me feel more proud of what my species can achieve when it puts its mind to it.

    And as one of the comments on the Curiosity Rover story says:

    Oh man, that was so cool!

    They basically just parked a Volkswagen Beetle on a predetermined spot on another planet more than 150 million miles away by lowering it with ropes from an almost hovering jetpack.

    Just like that.

    Of course, ordinary folks like me in the nation that managed such a feat still can’t afford healthcare insurance, and Texas is about to execute someone with an IQ somewhere in the 60’s.

    Goddam, this is one crazy fucking world, ain’t it? You couldn’t make this shit up, y’know?

    Quite.

    Leave a comment

  • The Amish – Lovely People…

    So, the BBC had yet another documentary about the Amish last night. Following on from the programmes about the Stoltzfus families, the BBC gave us a programme about David and Miriam Lapp and their adorable children.

    And, just as with the Stoltzfus families, I found myself simultaneously liking the Lapps, but also cringing at their complete obliviousness of what humanity has achieved, for better or for worse.

    David and Miriam came across as genuinely likeable, but there was that awful frisson when Miriam started talking about the rod (as the Bible states), as an effective method of chastisement of her children, while smiling all the while. At this point, her youngest son pipes up to implore her not to use the rod (in her case a wooden spoon – with a smiley face drawn upon it!) on him. She grinned. I found that shocking and not at all cute or lovely.

    In the end, I once more found myself thanking my lucky stars that I was not born into an Amish community. The chains around the human spirit would have proved too much for me.

    38 responses to “The Amish – Lovely People…”

    1. Arthur Murgatroyd Avatar
      Arthur Murgatroyd

      Seems you have a problem with parents disciplining their children.

      Regardless, the discipline of Amish parents does not necessarily result in ideal citizens as you would learn from the Stick Figure Production documentary “Devil’s Playground” about Rumspringa.
      Some Amish teenagers have even been arrested for being drug dealers.

      1. Geoff Coupe Avatar

        I don’t believe that beating children is a good way to bring them up.

        1. L. Guenther Avatar
          L. Guenther

          I realize that the Lapps are in favor of corporal punishment, but I didn’t find that scene gruesome at all. The child in question was too young to hide fear and he obviously didn’t fear that spoon one bit……he was playing with it. Now, Miriam Lapp may use that spoon on occasion, but if you look at the body language and the interaction between the children and their parents, they have loving and gentle interactions with one another. I didn’t see it as anything more than that.

        2. henrirt Avatar
          henrirt

          Thats not a beating when spanking a disobedient child.
          A beating is what America did to Britian during the revolutionary war.

        3. Ivan jimenez Avatar
          Ivan jimenez

          Geoff, if you want to be taken seriously you need to leave the logical fallacies out of your arguments. When you wrote that you don’t believe that “beating children” is a good way to bring them up, it reeks of bias. If anybody were to watch the documentary they would see that Miriam referenced “light taps” and sometimes “harder tap”. For you to suggest that she beats her children is simply wrong. To give a name to the logical fallacy you used, my first thought would be a “thought terminating cliché” by the use of “beating”, but you also made “conspicuous withholding of relevant facts”, and a whole bunch of others.

          1. Geoff Coupe Avatar

            You’re also assuming that her definition of a tap is your definition of a tap. The look on the child’s face when she spoke of this was, as I recall, not one of relaxation.

    2. l0lls22 Avatar
      l0lls22

      I thought Miriam was generally very smiley and I didn’t think it was a terrible moment when she described her discipline methods – even though I disagree with them. Generally, I thought they were a lovely family and I was very touched by this programme. I think its wonderful that this couple, despite their very simple and prescibed existance have nevertheless had an awakening…really touching.

      1. Clare Avatar
        Clare

        I tend to agree with this.

    3. Clare Avatar
      Clare

      I agree. This was a truly insightful programme into the lives of Christian Amish. I was touched by their simple and family-loving way of life. The lack of need for materialism was refreshing and for me, thought provoking.

      1. Geoff Coupe Avatar

        Lack of need for materialism is one thing. Being bound by archaic, and sometimes somewhat bizarre (e.g. no bicycles!), rules is another. I can do the former without the latter.

        1. Clare Avatar
          Clare

          It may be ‘bizarre’ for you Geoff in your world, but evidently not for them.

            1. Clare Avatar
    4. Matt Foot Avatar

      The Bible is the word of God. Whether or not you agree with it is irrelevant; they follow it to the letter, and look HOW happy they are. I’ve yet to find SO many families as content with SUCH a simple and blessed life, as the Amish.

      Follow God’s instruction and ignore “opinions” – you won’t go wrong. God is perfect, ergo, his instruction manual gives you guidance for a happy life.

      1. Geoff Coupe Avatar

        Matt, thanks for your opinion. However, based on the evidence I see, god is a human invention, and the bible is a collection of writings by human authors.

        1. Zubin Avatar
          Zubin

          Geoff, its difficult to explain God’s existence- as difficult as explaining the taste of honey. Sincerely seek – from the bottom of your heart – saying, ” God , if you exist , reveal yourself to me” everyday ..and wait. I too had your belief that God was created by man but before I came to a final conclusion I did what I suggested to you … and my beliefs were turned on its head by Him whom I now worship as God my creator through a personal encounter which he gave me. No wonder Jesus said that He would reveal himself not to the wise of this world but to children!!

          1. Geoff Coupe Avatar

            Sorry Zubin, you might believe that; however that does not make it true. Personal encounters are not sufficient evidence except in the minds of those that have them. The brain is capable of many peculiar beliefs. Look up Cotard’s syndrome sometime, and then try and convince a sufferer of that that they are not dead but alive.

        2. Pamela Enmark Avatar
          Pamela Enmark

          YES! And Shakespeare happens to be one of them! You’re right on this one Geoff!

          1. Geoff Coupe Avatar

            Well, to be strictly accurate, I think it’s fairer to say that Will was fond of quoting from it, but he wasn’t one of the original authors…

    5. Lynn Peckham Avatar
      Lynn Peckham

      I enjoyed this programme.I am a Christian but for me, that wasn’t what was pertinent. I found their entire way of life fascinating. Life is so frenetic, that to see people able to live in this world without all the things we think we can’t live without, mobile phones, computers, cars etc, was really refreshing. I found myself envying the total simplicity of their lives. Yes, they work hard but they have something to show for it. And their families definitely benefit. Family life today is under threat, these people know that family is important and something to be valued. We have so much technology that is supposed to make our lives easier. All it seems to be doing is making life faster and isolating us even more from each other. Maybe it’s time to take note and realise that we need to simplify our lives and concentrate more on the small things…..?

      1. Geoff Coupe Avatar

        Lynn, I sympathise with your viewpoint, but the means to live simpler is within ourselves. I concur with you that concentration on the small things in life is valuable. I just happen to do that without the need for gods. Family is important, but I suspect that the Amish would disagree with me over what a family is.

        1. Lynn Peckham Avatar
          Lynn Peckham

          Yes,Geoff, I agree. The mere fact that I am sitting in front of this computer proves that we are not always strong enough to resist the lure of technology. I yearn for a simpler life, for myself and my children. I despair that children are forced to grow up so quickly, not knowing a childhood. What I loved about this programme was how the children had such freedom and innocence. My 10 year old is more like a teenager despite our efforts to keep things simple. We have tried to hold off on the gadget buying, she’s just got an MP3 player and her requests for a mobile phone have been ignored. We live in the country and I am keen to move to an even more rural area to try to escape the frenetic pace of a town/city. We tried living in London before we had children(we’re originally from South Africa) and just couldn’t take the pace of life there. It was too loud, too fast and way too superficial and impersonal. Society is losing sight of the importance of connections, everyone is only in it for themselves. It’s very me-orientated…what can I get out of it…Anyway, sorry for the soapbox speech. This is something I have a very strong opinion about and as I said, I have long found the simple Amish way of life enviable. I mentioned to my daughter tonight that we need to move to America and go to live with them. Needless to say she was horrified…esp when I said there is no tv, no phones, no computers 🙂

          1. Geoff Coupe Avatar

            Lynn, no need to apologise for the soapbox!

            As I said before, I can sympathise. When I was young, I lived in London and loved it, but now I’m very content to live in the country, and don’t miss city life at all. Nonetheless, technology is extremely useful, and I don’t think should be dismissed as simply “a lure”. My computer and the internet is what enables me to keep in touch with my “nearest” and dearest beyond my physical neighbourhood, and that’s a boon, and it enables broadening of horizons far beyond what was available to my parents or others in the world today.

            Connections *are* important, but they can occur in all sorts of ways and places, and while some of them can only be mediated via technology, they’re not necessarily the worse or the poorer for that.

    6. Karen Collins Avatar
      Karen Collins

      While I think the Lapp family seem really lovely people, and I do slighly envy what seems a very simple life, realistically though I don’t think god would deem all modern technology as a sin if they had any. Its all about control and it does not need to damage any ”family time”. I don’t really like the way the Amish elders seem to dictate their parishioners lifes and the fact they could not be honest and tell their elders in fear of being ex-communicated tells me something is wrong. God forgave sinners and nobody has the right to say anything different.

      1. Zubin Avatar
        Zubin

        Yes Karen,I agree with you. I however think that the Lapp family is challenging those beliefs within their community. The challenge for us is greater- not to become Amish but to incorporate their value and priority systems of 1st place to Jesus, then family , then work, centering their lives around the principles, words and faith in Jesus while living in the midst of technology and within the hustle and bustle of modern life. I guess the key is to love …love of God and of man under the power and leading of the Holy Spirit. Then as scripture says….we would truly become..”the lamps to be kept on the lamp-stands”..children of God. “Bloom where you are planted”

    7. Maggie Avatar
      Maggie

      I just watched this documentary and realised what we are missing in life…….simplicity and love towards one another. The world is in turmoil and yet they seem to escape it, instead, focussing on their beliefs and values. I wonder if the world would be a much better place if only we held the same values……..love goes a long way.

    8. Matt Foot Avatar

      You see the happiness, yet cannot account for it, since you seem to be rejecting God. You could never experience the joy these Amish have in life WITHOUT God, to pretend otherwise is just foolishness. The remainder is a big wooden house, nice people and lots of hard work. They alone do not create happiness. Impossible.

      1. Geoff Coupe Avatar

        It may be impossible to you Matt, but it’s clearly not impossible for many of us to achieve happiness without gods or goddesses.

    9. Rob Avatar
      Rob

      During the show, there was a simply lovely piece of music played in the background. It sounded like Bach and was sung by 2 women – anyone out there know the song/singers etc? it was breathtaking

      1. Katie Avatar
        Katie

        Rob,

        The music is Salve Regina and It is performed by a group called ‘All Angels’. You can purchase it from Amazon.

        I concur that the music is very beautiful. But.. the good people at the BBC showed how little they really understand about the history of the Amish people. Salve Regina is an anthem that exalts the Virgin Mary in the sense that Catholics view her. The Amish are Anabaptists and find Catholic doctrines regarding the virgin Mary to be profoundly in error. The Anabaptists fled Catholic persecution. I’m not going to take sides here, I just think that it shows how little the BBC seriously researched their subject.

        In general the BBC has done good work, so this surprised me.

        Because He Lives……

    10. ottomummy Avatar

      Bit late on the responses, but I just Googled to find out what happened to the Lapp family. I too was taken with their “simple” lifestyle. But the undercurrents of their life is far from simple. Remember how they had to hide the fact that they had been re-baptised for fear of excommunication. In what way is that a good life to lead. That your elders will cast you out if you do not follow their strict and unbending rules and therefore you have to “lie” to them or “avoid telling the truth”. What the programme did not discuss (and good, because it was about the Lapp family only) was that the Amish community is in a state of turmoil and are split into many divisions. Let’s take the simple life and the religious life separately. We can all lead a simple life, making decisions that we do not have to hide from others for fear of exclusion. I though Miriam was great and she seemed to understand that the elders had some strange ideas that rather got in the way of being a Christian.

    11. Paul T Avatar
      Paul T

      I think the piece of music you mention was a variation of Pachabel’s Cannon – I agree a lovely piece of music. This was a wonderful, thought-provoking programme.

    12. Ohanzi Avatar
      Ohanzi

      I think the family is wonderful, although I don’t agree with the wooden spoon as a punishment. I never or have spanked my child. She is 21 yrs. old now. But, as a child when she fibbed or said a swear word, I had no one to blame but myself. When she done something that I didn’t approve of, I just pulled her aside and talked to her, in a calm voice… after that…she went outside to play and I went about my house work…. end of story.

    13. val dc Avatar
      val dc

      Hi ! I’m french abd I’ve just seen that documentary. Something really shocks me ! Did you hear Miriam when she talks about her wife condition ? She said that sometimes David blames her for things that she has done wrong. She said that she must be grateful even if it hurts her. And I think to myself that the woman condition take a big slap of 50 years back. She lives trought her husband, she have no own personnality, she’s a shadow… do you really think that’s she’s happy ?
      And when she talks about her poor David who’s suffering so much because means womens are not dressed in a appropried way… She didn’t know anything about that before he told her how difficult it is to be a man ! Hey ! Are you kidding ? It must be a joke !
      Just like you I thought at first that they were a quite nice family, but there’s someting strange, something wrong in that so perfect life they seem to have.
      Sorry for my english, I know it’s not perfect 🙂

      1. Geoff Coupe Avatar

        Your English is very good – far better than my French!

    14. Dave Avatar
      Dave

      I guess I’m a bit late with my response here, just a few years. Anyways, English isn’t my mother tongue either but I feel confident enough to give it a shot. Just deal with the typos and grammatical horrors I will most likely fabricate.

      Maybe it’s a good idea to elaborate on the way the documentary was seen through my eyes. Go get some coffee or tea, because this might become lengthy. (edit: it’s ridiculously long. Maybe I should have just said “hi”.)

      Since I am agnostic to the core, I didn’t come here to sell a religion or deny the existence of any religion. My world revolves and evolves around evidence, logic, common sense and plausible theories. I approach science in the same manner as I approach religion. Let’s just say that in science things add up most of the time, and when it doesn’t it’s because old scientific theories have been found inaccurate or simply wrong. When that happens the scientific world usually embraces these new findings. Science is open minded and always can always undergo massive changes within its own theories.

      That’s where religion falls short in my opinion. There are so many different religions (and branches) out there that all claim they are right. I’ve taken a lot of time to dive into many of them. If one religion is right, other religions must be wrong. That would mean quite a few people have gambled wrong. All those unfortunate people will have wasted their lives and will, according to some religions, end up in hell. So even when they think they are doing the right thing, some loving and forgiving god will send them to hell. If you grew up without even knowing about religion, you’ll go to hell. If you’re a baby that died before being baptized, theoretically you’ll go to hell too. If you chose to be agnostic and live a good and loving live without causing any harm, you’ll still go to hell according to some of these religions. These are usually the same religions that have left an unerasable trace of pain, torture, rape, murder, blood and suffering throughout history. Many times contradicting the very essence they try to underline. And all this horror just keeps on happening as we speak. All in the name of some loving god.

      There´s very little logic and common sense in all of that. Which brings me back to what I said before; I am agnostic. I’m not saying there is no god. I’m just saying that if there is a god and all those men written scriptures were right, I will most likely go to hell. Despite the fact that I try to live my life the best way I can. Helping, caring, loving those around me and even some I don’t even know. If I chose to live like this and it turns out that there is a god after all, and he’ll send me to hell for not believing in him,.. I’d rather be in hell. That kind of god is not loving, forgiving or caring. That kind of god is a dictator, a narcissistic and truly nasty creature. That’s all hypothetical of course, from an agnostic point of view.

      Now, for the documentary. I found it very enlightening to see how these wonderful people live. One thing that really stuck with me was how David noted that he hoped that he didn’t offend anyone by showing the world how they live and showing their vision of life. If all religions would be like that this world would be a much better place. In that aspect he is a much better man than I am since I am pretty sure I offended a few people by writing some of the things above. The documentary has also shown the struggles within this particular religion itself, and how structures are being build to avoid people from leaving the religion. This is how every religion works though. There’s very little to no room for questioning. Believe or be wrong and pay the price. In this particular case Miriam even mentioned the lies that have been forced upon them.

      Something I find strange about the Amish is how they (most of them anyways) do their best to avoid the use of technology.Yes a phone is okay, as long as it’s not in the house. Using technology when it’s owned by someone else (a car for instance) is okay as well. Living your life simple out of free choice isn’t a bad thing. Living your life simple because your religion tells you to live it simple is something a bit different. There’s really no choice in what you want then really. Your children won’t really have a choice either. Religious rules are spoon fed into them, shielding them from the outside world, for the sole purpose of protecting the religion itself. How can you challenge your believes if you have no idea what the alternatives are? How can you determine what is the truth and what isn’t if you’ve only been shown one “truth”? Even more important: How can you know Tony Blair isn’t pulling the strings anymore if you’re shielding yourself and those you love from the outside world?

      Another thing that made me think was that, apparently, David had some inner battle going on regarding the opposite sex and the challenges it presented in regards to lust. The total lack of education is overwhelming. It would be interesting to witness a conversation between him and a radical muslim. “You blow yourself up and you get how many virgins you said???”

      Apart from that, I truly admire David and Miriam. It must have taken a lot of courage, faith and doubts to go along with this documentary. My heart broke when I saw the sadness and pain Miriam was going through when she started crying. The smile she wore throughout most of the documentary was replaced by reality and awareness. The mask came off, just for a little while.

      Still, this dysfunctional planet has a lot to learn from them when it comes to basic values. If David and Miriam are brave enough, they could learn a thing or two from us as well. They opened the door for us, reaching out and offering some insight. An open door allows passage from two directions. Let’s hope the best values and standards will find they way through.

      I hope David, Miriam and their beautiful kids didn’t have to go through a lot of stress and pain as a result of this documentary. Either way, I’m grateful that they had the courage to allow this to be filmed.

      1. yahwehprevails Avatar
        yahwehprevails

        Thumbs Up Dave!

        I sooo enjoyed reading your comment. You sir are a wonderful person, as I assessed from your statements. I am a believer of our Heavenly Father and a believer of His Truth. You are spot on about the division in religion… Religion is a lie & a trap from ye old evil one, indeed! The Bible has become the ‘Holy Babble’ with its many versions abound to surround and confuse the masses. Many tales of woe have been stated about our Heavenly Father, yet another way to seek, kill & destroy the masses one way or the other.

        I understand that you are agnostic and clearly see why it is so… In your statements I see that you are ManKind living in the ways of this world and the deception thereof. You have a brilliant mind and at best have kept yourself away from the minds of many, setting your own self set-apart from the rest who follow this and follow that never finding TRUTH.

        I leave this comment section with special thoughts of you, blessed to have read your statements. Take Care & Stay Safe!

    15. yahwehprevails Avatar
      yahwehprevails

      What a crock @Geoff…

      How you found anything @ the Lapp’s family filming out of order shows you have no respect for a family living a life worth the living! You need to go back to kindergarden and start over, more so as a young Amish child. Complete obliviousness is who you are! You see only what man has invented over time, not what ManKind should do to live a life well worth the living! Kiss Off!!!

    Leave a comment

  • “So, How Much Trouble Are We In?”

    The opening quote, from the lovely Rory, in the trailer for the BBC’s next season of…

    Doctor Who!

    Ooh! I can’t wait! And was that a baby weeping angel doing a riff on the definitive moment from Pitch Black? Damn, this looks to be worth waiting for…

    Leave a comment

  • Let’s Have A Kiki

    Despite those who feel that this is merely passé, I like this track enormously, and am pleased to see the video from the Scissor Sisters.

    My niece recently sent me an email reporting that she and her family had seen Scissor Sisters at the Wickerman Festival this year, and saying how much they had enjoyed the performance. As she wrote:

    They will be the talk of the festival for years and I’m delighted many of Ana Matronic’s comments will have upset all the homophobes in the audience.

    Amen!

    Leave a comment

  • Litmus Test

    Reading the reactions to Danny Boyle’s Olympic Opening Ceremony is something of a litmus test, gauging where the commentator resides on the spectrum from left to right, or from heartfelt to disingenuous.

    I have to say that I loved it, although it was so full of cultural references that I will need a second or third viewing to appreciate them all. As Marina Hyde wrote,

    …as deliciously indigestible to global tastes as Marmite or jellied eels. I loved it.

    Just to make it clear, I am on the opposite end of the spectrum to the tweets from Aidan Burley, and from the blindness of those who did not see the Windrush reference (Ranga Mberi, I’m looking at you).

    Overall, I find myself in agreement with Al Weiwei, who compared the machine-like opening of the Beijing games (impressive as it was) with the gentler, more human-scale vision of the London Olympics.

    But I have to doff my hat at Marina Hyde’s invention of the term “the global arseoisie”, and her description of them:

    For while it was the best of folks, it was also the worst of folks. Gazing stonily down on a parade of athletes, about whose dreams and sacrifices this entire extravaganza is supposed to be, were some absolute shockers. Taking gold in the Biggest Scumbag in the Stadium event was probably the Bahraini prince, on whose directives athletes are reportedly tortured, flanked on the podium by Rwanda’s Paul Kagame and Prince Andrew’s brutal mate from Azerbaijan.

    That’s humanity – the best and the worst; thrown together, with mostly the worst in charge…

    4 responses to “Litmus Test”

    1. TomT Avatar
      TomT

      Now that I’ve discovered it featured Rowan Atkinson and dancing nurses I rather wish I’d watched it.

      1. Geoff Coupe Avatar

        Tom, I’m sure that YouTube will have something of the glory that was Rowan and the Nurses… I thought both were inspired…

        1. TomT Avatar
          TomT

          I am usually loath to watch such ceremonies (four years on and I’ve still seen only snippets of Beijing) but considering this was Old Blighty and I am an armchair Anglophile I really should have tuned in. I have to assume I’ll be allowed to pay for the privilege of viewing it again at some point, whether on disc or streaming.

    2. Matt Healy Avatar
      Matt Healy

      As a US citizen, I prefer such authenticity to the mix of jingoism and crass commercialism that my country tends to produce on such occasions. I’ve been to London a few times over the years. I’d like to visit Beijing some day, but if I were picking a place to live I’d certainly prefer London to Beijing.

    Leave a comment

  • Cloud Atlas

    “Cloud Atlas” is the name of a remarkable book by David Mitchell. A Russian Doll of a book, it contains stories within stories that link and arc to form a narrative that spans centuries and civilizations.

    I thought it was amazing.

    And now, it appears that a film of the book has been made. Even the trailer is almost six minutes long – it will be interesting to see how the film stacks up to the book. There are, at least, some good actors involved, so one can but hope.

    Update 4 September 2012: there’s a very good article on the making of the film in the current New Yorker. Definitely worth reading. I still fear for how the film will turn out. The Wachowskis are known for their bravura visual style over depth of characterisation (e.g. The Matrix), while the book is almost the complete opposite. Still, fingers crossed, the film may yet stand on its own feet as a work of art.

    Leave a comment

  • A Letter to a Mother

    Abdellah Taïa wrote a letter to his mother. A letter in which he explained his homosexuality to her. I regret that I cannot fully understand the French of the original letter, but this translation retains, I think, much of the power and passion of the original.

    Once again, I must say that I have been lucky enough to never have faced the same battles in my own family, but I’m mindful of those who do.

    Leave a comment

  • Subscribe, Not Purchase?

    There’s a post today on Microsoft’s official Office blog that talks about Office and the Cloud. One thing that leapt out at me was this:

    As part of the Customer Preview, we announced that you’ll be able to sign up for an Office subscription, which will ensure that wherever you go and whatever Windows device you are on, the latest and greatest version of Office will be there for you. We’ll be talking more about our subscription offer in a future post so please stay tuned.

    I’m all ears. I fear that in future, we will no longer be able to purchase the Office software, but we will have to subscribe (on a yearly basis?). I prefer to be able to purchase software, and then be able to make an informed decision about whether I upgrade to the latest and greatest version. It’s for that reason that I’m still using Office 2007 (and some of my neighbours are still using Office 2003). I, and they, saw no reason to upgrade. Will I move to Office 2013 – and will I have to also move to a different pricing structure? Time will tell.

    Update: I see that John Jendrezak (the author of the Microsoft blog post) has replied to my question assuring me that we will still be able to purchase the software as we always have done. So that’s a relief.

    2 responses to “Subscribe, Not Purchase?”

    1. Robert Dammers Avatar
      Robert Dammers

      Pricing is going to be a very delicate matter. Yes, I can see that subscription (which encourages everyone to get services) give guaranteed income, and continuous revenue is something software vendors want. But they are going to have a problem with market segmentation. They are competing with LibreOffice on PCs and Macs, and when they get the Windows 8 devices, they are competing with iLife (at about a tenner per component) on iPads. So they will have to be very clever if they don’t want to end up decimating the market.

      Fun, huh?

      BTW – I’ve been following your WHS comments with great interest. I’m still a V1 user, with 3Tb internal, and 5Tb external. I have my TechNet license for WHS 2011 ready for installation (with a DriveBender license to go with it), and am just wondering whether I might go straight to Server 2012 Essentials. Problem is, copying all my old data between structures is going to be the work of many days, so a lot of courage is necessary before proceeding!

      Best wishes,
      R.

      1. Geoff Coupe Avatar

        Hi Robert, good to hear from you. As you will have probably seen, I’ve updated the post with the news that Microsoft won’t be dropping the ability to purchase the software. So the subscriptions become an additional feature. I agree it’s going to be interesting to analyze the wrinkles. Probably we’ll have to build scenario models in Excel 2013 to do it.

        WHS v1 has held up pretty well. It’s a pity that WHS 2011 was such a disappointment by comparison. The guys over at The Home Server Show (http://homeservershow.com/) are discussing whether WSE 2012 is a suitable replacement for WHS, and Paul Branen (http://tinkertry.com/) is putting out some great videos showing the setup of WSE.

        While I think WSE.2012 will be a doddle for you, I really don’t think it is at all suitable for home users, despite what Microsoft say. And the price! Plus the fact that I rely on MyMovies for my HTPC, and there won’t be a version of this made for WSE 2012…

        Cheers.

    Leave a comment

  • Just Testing

    This blog post was been created in Microsoft’s Word 2013. Up until now, I’ve been using Microsoft’s Windows Live Writer very happily to do all my blogging with. However, I suspect the writing is on the wall (as it were), and Microsoft will be killing Windows Live Writer off in the not-too-distant future. So now I will probably have to get used to another tool. I’m not overly happy with using Word, but I’ll give it a try for a while.

    It does seem to be a bit of a step backwards from Windows Live Writer. For example, WLW had a facility to add in a photo album, but I’m not sure that Word can do this, it only seems to deal with individual images.

    It also seems to be getting confused with special characters. I’ve just opened a previous blog entry (Windows 8 “Play to” Revisted), and Word seems to think the title is:

    Windows 8 “Play to” Revisited

     And while Word’s template supports the WordPress Categories that I’ve set up, it doesn’t appear to support Tags in the template.

    Oh gawd – now it’s gone and changed the font…

    And I can’t see how I can retrieve older posts for revision, or open the pages (e.g. “About”) on my blog. I’m not impressed.

    Oh well, one step forwards, two steps back – as usual.

    7 responses to “Just Testing”

    1. Ludwig Avatar

      I also just tested Word 2013 as a blogging tool. My opinion is – well, the word that comes to mind is not proper in polite company. See my test post: http://ludwigkeck.wordpress.com/2012/07/17/using-word-2013-as-a-blogging-tool/

      1. Geoff Coupe Avatar

        Yes, I saw that; there’s lots of us trying it out, but I don’t think many of us are particularly impressed so far.

        Perhaps it will grow on me, but I was perfectly happy with Live Writer…

        1. Technogran Avatar

          Same here! It’s not even as good as some of the online blogging editors such as WordPress or Blogger! If their intention is to let Writer die a death, then all I can say is whoever is making all the decisions needs their heads testing. Besides which , Word will not be free, Writer is.

    2. MarkB Avatar
      MarkB

      I would be interested in your review of Office2013. I haven’t tried it for blogging but my early feedback is “too white” – however that may just be me. Send us some blog entries on how you are doing with it!

      1. Geoff Coupe Avatar

        Yes, it is rather sparse, isn’t it? Word 2007 looks almost baroque by comparison. And if it ain’t baroque, don’t fix it… Sorry, I’ll get my coat.

        I’m not sure whether I’ll attempt an in-depth review of Office 2013. I don’t know that I have the stamina, and I’m sure plenty of others will cover this. But I may well jot down a few things that strike me as time goes on. But even at this early stage, I think that Windows Live Writer runs rings around Word 2013 as a blogging tool. WordPress needs Word 2013 like a fish needs a bicycle.

        Having said all that, I have to say that OneNote MX is an interesting tool with a genuinely innovative UI. It may be a pointer of things to come.

    3. MarkB Avatar
      MarkB

      (groan) – lol

    4. […] I have the feeling that trying to use Word 2013 to do blogging is equally inelegant. It may be a fine Word Processor, but an elegant tool for writing blog posts, it is not. […]

    Leave a comment

  • Backing Up Your Data

    Here’s a simple question: do you have backups of the data held on your Windows PC or your Mac?

    Apparently, the answer from most people (if they’ve ever even thought about the question) is a resounding “no”. That’s the conclusion that Microsoft has reached. In a post on the Building Windows 8 blog, they state:

    Our telemetry shows that less than 5% of consumer PCs use Windows Backup and even adding up all the third party tools in use, it is clear nowhere near half of consumer PCs are backed up. This leaves user’s personal data and digital memories quite vulnerable as any accident can lead to data loss.

    Windows has had data backup tools included in it for years, but the fact is that very few people actually use them. Microsoft is introducing a totally new backup method in Windows 8 called File History. It comes with a user interface that is designed to be attractive and easy to use.

    Now there’s a lot to like about the Windows 8 File History feature, but it focuses on the user’s personal data. It will only backup data held in the user’s Libraries, Desktop, Contacts and Favourites. It will completely ignore applications that have their own databases, e.g. Adobe’s Lightroom. For some time, Microsoft has been telling developers to store application data in locations contained in the C:\ProgramData folder, and now the File History feature will totally ignore such files. Also, user data that is not document-based is supposed to be held in locations contained in the C:\Users\Username\AppData folder. That is also ignored by the File History feature. It turns out that Microsoft’s own Windows 8 Mail App stores mail messages in the AppData folder, so File History will not backup your mail messages. Microsoft seems to be assuming that we store our mail in the Cloud, e.g. in their Hotmail service. I’ve got news for them – we don’t all do this.

    I’ve got used to the elegant and simple-to-use client PC Backup function of Windows Home Server (which covers all files and provides a bare-metal restore). Moving to Windows 8 on my current hardware will mean that I will continue to use WHS for backup.

    However, because WHS does not support backup/restore of client PCs that use EFI/GPT technology, that will mean that I will have to use a combination of File History and some other method of backing up application data, if I invest in new hardware (a PC or a Tablet). Modern PCs use EFI/GPT.

    [Update 4 March 2013: Microsoft has at last issued a Hotfix to add backup support for UEFI-based computers to back up to servers that are running Windows Home Server 2011]

    Frankly, that makes it sound a bit of a kludge, instead of the current “set it and forget it” method of WHS.

    Peter Bright has a good analysis of the new File History feature, and a comparison with the older methods of data backup in Windows here. I rather like one of the comments on his analysis:

    So basically, they killed Windows Home Server but still don’t have an effective product to replace its backup mechanism. Got it.

    3 responses to “Backing Up Your Data”

    1. […] Backing up your data. Windows 8 has a new backup method: File History. Be aware that it only covers the contents of your Libraries, Desktop, Contacts and Favourites. It won’t cover application data, or your mail messages… Microsoft assumes that we all hold our email in the Cloud. Er, no, we don’t. […]

    2. Spike Avatar
      Spike

      I just discovered this very issue wrt the AppData and ProgramData folders.
      While the old way to backup still exists under “Windows 7 File Recovery”, it’s not the way forward, and the two (old way and File History) are mutually exclusive.

      Have you come across a way to keep using File History for backup?
      Only thing I can come up with is custom libraries but that seems dumb…

      1. Geoff Coupe Avatar

        I think custom libraries is the only way to do it, but it is a bit of a kludge…

        I’m not currently using File History at all – I rely on my WHS to backup all our PCs (none of them use GPT formatted drives, so we’re OK for the moment).

        There’s been a hint from Microsoft that it’s possible that support for GPT drives will appear in a future update to WHS 2011.

    Leave a comment

  • Well, I Told You So…

    So Microsoft has effectively killed off their Windows Home Server product.

    Being Microsoft, of course, they don’t say this quite as baldly as I just did. Instead, they’ve announced some details of their forthcoming Windows Server 2012 lineup of software, and buried on page 4 of the 6 page FAQ we find this:

    Q: Will there be a next version of Windows Home Server?

    A: No. Windows Home Server has seen its greatest success in small office/home office (SOHO) environments and among the technology enthusiast community. For this reason, Microsoft is combining the features that were previously only found in Windows Home Server, such as support for DLNA-compliant devices and media streaming, into Windows Server 2012 Essentials and focusing our efforts into making Windows Server 2012 Essentials the ideal first server operating system for both small business and home use—offering an intuitive administration experience, elastic and resilient storage features with Storage Spaces, and robust data protection for the server and client computers.

    OK, so they are saying that Windows Server 2012 Essentials is to be “the ideal first server operating system for both small business and home use”. And how much will it cost? Well, it’s $425. And how much does Windows Home Server 2011 cost? Er, $40. There’s no way I can possibly justify shelling out $425 for Microsoft’s proposed successor to WHS 2011.

    Now, to be fair, that $425 price is a retail price, while the $40 is an OEM price. There isn’t an OEM price for Windows Server 2012 Essentials, instead, there’s another product in the range that will be available as OEM software, and that’s Windows Server 2012 Foundation. We don’t yet know what the OEM price will be for this software, and while it will be less than $425, I very much doubt that it will be $40 either, probably more in the $100 – $150 range.

    But there’s another issue to worry about, will there be things missing from the Foundation version that are present in Essentials? Microsoft says this:

    “If you’re a small business with limited in-house skills, Windows Server 2012 Essentials is an appropriate option. It’s simple, affordable, and easy to manage, and has been tailored to address common small business IT scenarios. Windows Server 2012 Essentials is the ideal solution if you plan to expand your business capabilities through the cloud as it is designed to facilitate your connection to online services. On the other hand, if you have some level of in-house IT skills and want the ability to tailor server roles to their unique environments, then Windows Server Foundation is potentially better suited to your business.”

    In other words, if you are a home user, then you had better have some degree of IT skills at your fingertips if you want to use Windows Server Foundation, assuming that it does contain all the necessary functionality. It certainly won’t have the easy-to-use Wizards that will be present in the Essentials edition…

    The upshot of all this is that Microsoft has essentially dropped the whole concept of a Home Server product, priced for the consumer market. I can’t say that I’m the least little bit surprised, the writing has been on the wall since the early days of the development of WHS 2011.

    The first version of Windows Home Server began with a vision and a focus on the home consumer. There was even a set of guiding principles for the design of the storage system for WHS v1 that were predicated on the needs of the home consumer. After the release of that first version of WHS, the team leader (Charlie Kindel) moved on, the WHS team got reorganised, and ended up in the Server group at Microsoft – small fish in a very big pond. In the process of developing WHS 2011, they effectively tore up Kindel’s guiding principles, and the result has been a product that while it bears the word “Home” in its title, is far less focused on the home consumer than the first version. Now that focus has been reduced even further to a blur.

    While some people will question the value proposition of a home server in these days of cloud services and online streaming, I firmly believe that it has a place. I have more data than I can affordably hold in the cloud, and living as I do in the countryside, I am at the end of a piece of wet string, so streaming of high-quality content is not an option.

    The original concept of WHS, with its easy to manage storage, and single-instance backup of up to 10 client PCs was something that had clear value to me. Microsoft weakened that with WHS 2011, and now they are in effect getting out of the home server market altogether.

    The one possible ray of hope is that it may be possible to replicate the functionality of WHS using Windows 8. That is dependent on someone developing an App for Windows 8 that replicates the client PC backup functionality that is present in WHS, while addressing its limitation (it can’t backup PCs that use EFI/GPT technology). There’s a gap in the market opening up – let’s hope someone will fill it…

    [Update 4th March 2013: Microsoft has at last issued a Hotfix to add backup support for UEFI-based computers to back up to servers that are running Windows Home Server 2011]

    Update 15 July 2012

    Being somewhat curious, I downloaded the beta of Windows Server 2012 Essentials and installed it into a virtual machine. I followed the excellent guides provided by Jim McCarthy on how to do this. Here’s his guide on installing Hyper-V (the virtual machine environment) in Windows 8 and here’s his guide on installing the beta of Windows Server 2012 Essentials.

    I found that I needed to make a change to my PC to enable the virtualisation mode of the CPU, but once that was done (and the PC rebooted multiple times), the Hyper-V environment was up and running. The installation of the beta of WSE 2012 was very straightforward, and before too long, I saw the server appear on my home network.

    I have to say that I think Microsoft is being disingenous when they say that WSE 2012 is suitable for “home use”. From what I saw of the environment, it is clearly aimed at a small business, not the home. For one thing, it provides a full domain controller environment, which is very much overkill for the home.

    I confess that I didn’t leave WSE 2012 in place for very long before I deleted it and removed the Hyper-V environment.

    For one thing, although it may have been a coincidence, following the installation of WSE 2012 into Hyper-V running on my main Desktop PC, the WHS backup service of that PC stopped running. Looking in the Event Viewer showed .NET runtime errors occurring with the Windows Server Client Computer Backup Provider Service, which manages the backup and restore service for client computers. Since this service was stopped (and couldn’t be restarted without errors), I could not back up or restore data for my Desktop PC.

    The other thing that sealed the fate of WSE 2012 for me was the news that a version of MyMovies will not be developed for WSE 2012. Brian Binnerup, the developer of MyMovies, believes (quite rightly, in my view) that the market will be too small to justify development and support of a WSE 2012 version. Since I have the MyMovies server installed on my WHS 2011 system, that rather closes off a possible upgrade path from WHS 2011 to WSE 2012 (quite apart from the cost of WSE 2012, of course). It looks as though a future version of the MyMovies server will only be developed for Windows 8. Update 24 August 2012: I see that Brian Binnerup now seems to have changed his mind about supporting Windows Server Essentials 2012. That’s good to know, but it’s still too expensive for me.

    As a result, I have turned my back on Windows Server Essentials 2012. It has been removed from my PC. I’ve reinstalled the WHS 2011 Connector, and now my Desktop PC is once more being backed up on a daily basis to my WHS 2011 server.

    7 responses to “Well, I Told You So…”

    1. Matt Healy Avatar
      Matt Healy

      Have you looked at Retrospect backup software? I haven’t used it in years, and never used the Windows version, but back in the 1990s as the IT guy for a lab group that used Apple Macs I mafe heavy use of Retrospect to back them all up. The company is still around, and if their Windows product now is as good as their MacOS stuff was back then, it’s pretty darned good!

      The version I used basically turned client-server around: a small lightweight server runs on each machine that is to be backed up, to which the master machine used for scheduling backups talks. A very nice feature is it has an excellent way to detect duplicate files that minimizes network traffic: the program running on each machine sends back filename, datestamp, and hash value for each file. The machine with the tape drive compares each file to a catalog of what it already has on tape, so the actual data need only be transmitted over the network if the file isn’t a duplicate.

      I used Retrospect from 1992 through 1998 to back up about a dozen Macs at Yale School of Medicine, during which time I needed either to restore a crashed machine or rescue old data numerous times. I found Retrospect to be a very robust and flexible tool.

      1. Geoff Coupe Avatar

        Matt, thanks for the info. It sounds as though Retrospect uses a similar algorithm to the WHS client PC backup function. I suspect that I’ll be in the market for an alternative to the WHS backup by the time I buy/build my next PC – since that will almost certainly be using EFI/GPT. However, that is probably a year or so away, and I’ll see what’s on the market (and in the Windows Store) then.

    2. Aussie_Z Avatar

      Geoff … thanks for the update … As you say the writing was on the wall … And I had just (finally) got over my “computer monitoring error bug” too … I don’t feel that the ”Gauntlet has been thrown down” … I feel that it has been thrown at me. Thanks Microsoft – as usual we spend all our time and money debugging your product … and then you cancel it!!! 😦

      Retrospect seems like an option … but there appears to be a $119 cost … Which might be OK if the system works as advertised. Of course WHS provided remote access too … which means that we will need an OS at additional cost, and other software to replicate full WHS functionality.

      I will also be looking for a WHS replacement in a year or so … so we’ll see if someone steps up to fill the gap. Let’s hope so.

    3. Poppapete Avatar
      Poppapete

      No one seems to be addressing the problem of backing up GPT disks. I want to upgrade both my desktop (over 3 years old) and my laptop (over 5 years old) to UEFI ASUS based systems. Unless I have it wrong there is no server based solution that can accomplish this effectively. I am using WHS 2011 at present.

    4. Al Feersum Avatar

      Meh. There are backup solutions available: I use CrashPlan for my HomeServer OS partition (but I also use the internal server backup too, onto a dedicated VHD).

      I’ve been running my HomeServer in a Hyper-V environment on a 2008 R2 server for a long time – V1 was OK, although I started getting issues with the DriveExtender – one thing I’m glad they got rid of for 2011. But it’s been a pretty good platform all told, apart from trying to do stupid things like running multiple small VHDs under software RAID control.

      It also means I can use one machine to host a SQL Server 2008 R2 instance, a vanilla XP SP1 machine so I can strip the DRM off BBC WMVs downloaded from iPlayer, and my HomeServer.

      As for 2012 Essentials… I’ll give it a look, but if it doesn’t provide similar services to WHS2011 then I think I’ll give it a miss.

    5. […] it was clear that Microsoft no longer loved Windows Home Server, and it was no surprise when Microsoft announced in July 2012 that there would be no next version of WHS. That means, according to Microsoft’s Product Support […]

    6. […] it was clear that Microsoft no longer loved Windows Home Server, and it was no surprise when Microsoft announced in July 2012 that there would be no next version of WHS. That meant, according to Microsoft’s Product Support […]

    Leave a comment

  • The Gauntlet Has Been Thrown Down

    Just to follow up on my post about Microsoft Surface for a moment, I do think we live in interesting times.

    Peter Bright, over at Ars Technica, has a good article on the impact on OEMs of Microsoft entering the tablet hardware market; he likens it to Microsoft giving the OEMs a gentle kick in the teeth. The problem is that, compared with Apple’s iPad, the build quality of tablets running either Android or Windows is pretty dire. Even the so-called quality manufacturers have not exactly covered themselves with glory here. Samsung’s flagship Windows 7 Tablet, the 700T, for example is still plagued with the fact that its screen lifts away from the housing.

    As Peter Bright says:

    To allow Windows 8 to compete with iOS, Microsoft needs hardware to compete with the iPad. Bad hardware would jeopardize Redmond’s ability to play in the tablet space, but the PC OEMs have established for themselves a track record of producing little else. And while many of the OEMs have produced Android tablets to try to compete with the iPad, they’ve also consistently failed to match its quality.

    So Microsoft has drawn upon its 30-year history of producing hardware and made two models of Windows 8 tablets to show the OEMs how its done. Now admittedly, that 30-year history has been mostly spent in the area of producing mice and keyboards. But, on the other hand, Microsoft also makes the Xbox, which although it is a game console, has a similar level of complexity as a PC. Still, the engineering that is required for a high-quality tablet is definitely up a notch from the Xbox, so I am intrigued to see whether Microsoft can pull it off, and kick the OEMs in the teeth.

    What I also find intriguing is Peter Bright’s thoughts on how this might all play out. Scenario one is that the OEMs rise to the challenge and produce high-quality Windows 8 tablets. In which case, Microsoft can keep the Surface going as a small-scale, US-only operation.

    However, as Peter Bright points out, at least one OEM, Acer, has dismissed Microsoft’s challenge. In fact Acer, in the form of Oliver Ahrens, Acer’s senior VP and president for Europe, Middle East and Africa, believes that Microsoft is making a failed attempt to mimic Apple. He’s quoted as saying “I don’t think it will be successful because you cannot be a hardware player with two products”. Ahrens appears to overlook the fact that Apple dominates the tablet market with just two iPad products.

    Frankly, with friends like Oliver Ahrens, I don’t think Microsoft needs enemies.

    So then it might be opportune for Peter Bright’s second scenario to be realised. If the OEMs fail to rise to the challenge, the Microsoft must ramp up the Surface operation to a global scale, much as they have done with the Xbox.

    As I say, we live in interesting times.

    Addendum, 27 July 2012

    Charlie Kindel has an interesting post up on this subject of whether Microsoft is a hardware company. His view?

    Microsoft is not, and never will be, a hardware company.

    Kindel worked in Microsoft for over twenty years, and knows the company well. What I found particularly telling in today’s post was the observation that there are still organisational silos there:

    I know some of the people who drove the Xbox360 hardware design and supply chain management. They are now war scarred and seasoned experts. They are the type of people you want working on the next big thing. None of them even knew about Surface until it was announced. Typical Microsoft organizational silos.

    Oh dear.

    Leave a comment

  • Some People Just Don’t Grok It

    Yesterday, Microsoft revealed that it would be entering the Tablet market with two models of its own. I’ll come back to them later, but first, I must say that I’m struck by the continuing negative press that Windows 8 continues to receive. While it’s by no means perfect, I find the hyperbolical vitriol poured on it by some of the technical press quite astounding, and almost entirely without basis.

    Yes, the Metro user interface (UI) is very different from the UI of the traditional Windows Desktop, but I note that the iPad UI is very different from the traditional Mac desktop OS X UI, and yet none of the negative reviewers seem to even give this a second thought. Somehow, they seem to have adapted to being able to use both devices, and praise Apple to the skies.

    Apple, when it created iOS, took the view that a touch-oriented direct-manipulation user interface demands entirely different solutions and paradigms than mouse/pointer-driven user interfaces do. Microsoft, on the other hand, recognises the same challenge, yet is attempting to support both within the one operating system: Windows 8. That seems to me to be a far riskier strategy that the play-it-safe one that Apple has followed.

    I don’t have either a touchscreen or a touchpad on my PC, yet I’ve not found any problem about continuing to be productive using Windows 8, unlike some technical reviewers. I rather suspect that either they don’t like change, or they don’t like Microsoft.

    And now Microsoft has further upped the ante, by announcing two Tablets bearing the Microsoft name, and called Surface. The entry-level Tablet runs Windows RT (the version of Windows 8 designed to run on ARM hardware), while the top-of-the-range model runs Windows 8 Pro and uses Intel’s Ivy Bridge architecture.

    The entry-level Tablet is clearly aimed at the iPad market niche, but I’ve never found that market niche particularly interesting. I want something that is more than just a device for consuming content. I want one that has the power of a desktop available. So the more interesting one (to me) is the one running Windows 8 Pro. This comes with a pen, and (excellent) handwriting recognition is part of Windows 8. Coupled with the detachable keyboard, this model of the Surface range looks as though it meets my desire for origami computing.

    surface_01

    As well as the Surface tablets, Microsoft also announced two new keyboards (which double as covers for the Surface). The “Touch” model (3mm thick) is shown in the picture above. The “Type” model (5 mm thick) comes with moving keys for a traditional feel.

    The specifications of the Surface tablets are still not spelt out in great detail, but the top model seems to have two cameras (one forward-facing and one rear-facing), and a screen resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels. The Intel-based Surface has a mini DisplayPort for Video. I wonder whether this could also be a Thunderbolt port for connecting other devices, although I suspect that that will come in a future Surface model in 2013. No word on price, either, so I’ll have to wait to see whether this is a good match with my wishlist. But I have to say, it does look good.

    Update: I watched the video of the Microsoft presentation yesterday and picked up on a couple of things.

    First, the Windows RT machine being demonstrated by Steven Sinofsky froze up on him during the demo. He had to switch it for another machine. To be fair, demos of unreleased hardware and software are always a highwire act, so it’s hardly surprising he had to rely on the safety net of a second machine.

    Second, the words that are spoken during these Microsoft presentations are very carefully chosen. When Sinofsky talked about retail channels, he only talked about Microsoft’s own stores, both physical and online. These are both US-only, which leads me to worry that Surface may only ever be available in the US. It won’t be the first time Microsoft has done this; the Zune and Microsoft Kin products were also US-only. If that does turn out to be the case, then that will be a real disappointment to me.

    One other thought, I know that I said that it would be the Windows 8 Pro version of Surface that I would be interested in, because I thought the Windows RT Surface would be too limiting, like the iPad. Someone pointed out that you can still get the full PC experience on a Windows RT device by using the Remote Desktop App, and accessing the full environment of a desktop PC through the Surface tablet. Now that is a very interesting idea, and one that I had not considered. I often use the Remote Desktop App to remotely login to my Windows Home Server from my desktop PC, and the experience is indeed just as though I have my monitor, keyboard and mouse directly connected to the server. However, it would mean that I would have to upgrade my Desktop PC to Windows 8 Pro, so it is not a cost-free route.

    So I may have options. Options are good.

    8 responses to “Some People Just Don’t Grok It”

    1. MarkB Avatar
      MarkB

      I suspect that if Apple told their faithful that iOS was going to be their next desktop OS and that multitasking and overlapping windows were to be sunsetted, and that many options and features not used by the “majority” of them were being eliminated – they would be unhappy also.

      With that said, I have been using Win8 since the CP and have adjusted to it (what a ringing endorsement) – unfortunately for Metro, I have yet to find a single Metro version I would rather have. Looking at photos? Metro version is far too limited – try opening up 5 in a non-standard location, videos? Can’t tell because it requires me to agree to the Xbox Live Terms just to watch videos and then drops me into their store EVERY TIME, Mail? far too insecure – try telling it not to download pictures from a unsecure zone, Internet Explorer – please..no favorites, no addons, try doing 5 backpage clicks in a row using a mouse without getting angry, etc.

      I have gotten used to the start screen by not using it as MS states, but rather as a shortlist of frequently used programs and removing all the extras – they are still available via the “all programs” screen. But forcing desktop/mouse people to make large sacrifices in the way they do things and probably in productivity – so it is easier for the next generation of touch devices, well it is understandable there is a lot of resistance.

      1. Geoff Coupe Avatar

        Mark, I totally agree that the current state of the Metro Apps is abysmal – and I’ve said so a number of times. Until they improve, I’ll continue living in the Desktop environment for most of the time. But the point is that, with Windows 8, I can do this. Indeed, there are some improvements under the covers over Windows 7 for the Desktop. So I really don’t feel that I’m being “forced to make large sacrifices in productivity”

        I grant you that I have made some changes to the way I do things – primarily moving from a Start Button to a Start Screen – but frankly, I don’t think of it as a large sacrifice. I’m now driving on the right side of the road, instead of on the left, and I have a different set of road signs to deal with – but I can still get from A to B with the minimum of fuss…

        1. MarkB Avatar
          MarkB

          True – but if you stay in the desktop environment and reconfigure defaults (not a trivial task for a non-expert) to use desktop versions of tools then it seems there is little point of going to WIn8 unless you have a specific requirement (such as Windows-on-a-stick).

          Remember, many of those improvements (such as the video and playback enhancements) are Metro-only, while important items such as the NTFS alternate data stream flag are gone.

          1. Geoff Coupe Avatar

            I suspect many a non-expert will be perfectly happy with the Metro Apps, and won’t bother trying to reconfigure defaults to stick with the old Desktop tools. Then again, I haven’t bothered to reconfigure them either, since I tend to open the old desktop tool first and then choose my file.

            Are the video and playback enhancements really only able to be exploited by Metro Apps? I don’t think so, if I’m understanding this post by renethx: http://www.avsforum.com/t/1414544/windows-8-media-enhancements-described-in-building-windows-8#post_22113723

            I’m sure that some features can only be exploited by Metro Apps, but some are available to traditional desktop apps as well. It would be interesting to find a list that clearly specifies which group an improvement would fall into.

            Is the NTFS alternate data stream flag really so important? I thought it was a legacy hangover, and one that nowadays often gets exploited by Malware.

            1. MarkB Avatar
              MarkB

              I am not a AV expert or programmer. My comments came from my interpretation of the Win8 blog (http://blogs.msdn.com/b/b8/archive/2012/06/08/building-a-rich-and-extensible-media-platform.aspx) where it states, “Smooth Streaming is Microsoft’s initiative to deliver high quality multi-bitrate content and enable Video-on-demand, Live, Linear TV, and Download-and-Play.” and checking the Smooth Streaming SDK (http://forums.iis.net/t/1187882.aspx) it is Metro-only. Hopefully the improvements outlined in the blog will be available to desktop apps as well!

              1. Geoff Coupe Avatar

                Yes, the SDK in question is designed for Metro Apps, but the underlying technology can be utilized by traditional desktop apps as well, as pointed out in renethx’s post…

    2. […] Geoff Coupe's Blog Reflections on life at "De Witte Wand" Skip to content HomeAboutGardensWedding AlbumWines I Have Known ← Some People Just Don’t Grok It […]

    3. […] I’ve mentioned before how much I’ve been surprised by the level of vitriol and hatred that has been unleashed against Microsoft’s forthcoming Windows 8 operating system. Everywhere I turn, on tech blogs and forums, there are articles, posts and threads complaining about the “disaster” that Windows 8 is. Opinions galore, often complete with falsehoods stated as facts. […]

    Leave a comment

  • Gone, But Not Forgotten

    I didn’t write about the fact that Ray Bradbury died on the 5th June 2012, simply because I didn’t feel able to say anything of note. Like millions of people, I grew up recognising my feelings and emotions in some of his stories, and being amazed and shaken by the visions of others.

    However, Neil Gaiman has the ability to pen something that is a worthy memento of Bradbury. Go and read his short story: The Man Who Forgot Ray Bradbury.

    If you have ever read anything by Bradbury, you will feel the echoes and remember anew.

    Leave a comment

  • Windows 8 “Play to” Revisited

    Important Update 27 October 2012: The bug I describe below does seem to have been fixed in the final release of Windows 8. I can now use the “Play to” feature with my Denon AVR-3808.

    Hoorah!

    However, this is just one cheer. The Denon is not a “Windows Certified Play to” device, so the Microsoft-supplied Music Modern UI App does not recognise it as a device that can be used in a “Play to” scenario. While I can use the desktop Windows Media Player to “Play to” my Denon (as I could under Windows 7), the new Music App doesn’t even recognise the Denon as a “Play to” device.

    In a post on the Building Windows 8 blog, Microsoft states:

    Metro style apps work only with Windows certified Play To receivers [my emphasis]. These devices are validated to support modern media formats, are DLNA standards-compliant, and have great performance (including the updated Xbox 360 available later this year). The desktop experience first introduced in Windows 7 has been added to the Explorer Ribbon and will continue to support all DLNA DMR devices.

    So if I get one of the new tablets (e.g. Microsoft Surface) which run Windows RT, I won’t be able to use it to play music to my Denon. Why? Well, Windows RT does not support the desktop Windows Media Player, and Microsoft has just told me that their Metro Media Apps will not support my Denon, even though it is DLNA-certified. Yet another reason not to touch the Microsoft Surface with a bargepole, I think.

    It looks as though Microsoft are building proprietary extensions on top of the cross-industry DLNA specifications. I’m not convinced that this is a good thing.

    Update 4 February 2013: I see that Paul Thurrott has just written an article on this subject: The Sad Tale of Play To and Windows 8, with much the same conclusions. As I write in the comments here, it’s good to see that Mr. Thurrott is banging the same drum. He is able to make far more noise than I, but I think that Microsoft will remain deaf to the sounds. BTW, it’s worth reading the comment by John Galt after the Thurrott article. He lists a number of shortcomings in the media “features” that Microsoft have implemented in Windows 8, any one of which has me tearing my hair out. One wonders how Microsoft can be so dismal in delivering a product that should delight, not disappoint in so many ways.

    Update 31 March 2013: Barb Bowman has found a way to hack the Registry to get Windows 8 to recognize “uncertified” DLNA devices, and to use them within Windows 8 Apps. Like her, I wish that Microsoft would give advanced users the option to add our DLNA devices directly, without the need for these hacks.

    Update 21 October 2013: Well, now that the final release of Windows 8.1 is available, the Play to experience seems to be broken again. I applied the registry fix given by Barb Bowman (and which came originally from Microsoft’s Gabe Frost), and that no longer seems to work for me. One step forward, two steps back yet again. Thank you Microsoft.

    Update 24 October 2013: I posted the Windows 8.1 issue in a Microsoft forum, and got some useful feedback from Gabe Frost. The issue is not resolved, but at least we now know what’s going on. See https://gcoupe.wordpress.com/2013/10/23/play-to-and-windows-8-1/

    Original post

    You may recall that I’ve found that the “Play to” feature of Windows 8 is broken. I’ve been poking around trying different scenarios to see what’s going on, and come up with some further information.

    The bottom line is, yes, the Windows 8 implementation is broken as far as I’m concerned. However, I fear that Microsoft will simply say that this is not a bug, it’s a feature… What’s the old joke? Ah yes:

    Q: How many Microsoft developers does it take to change a lightbulb?
    A: None. Microsoft simply declares darkness to be the new standard.

    This is what I think I have found:

    • In Windows 7, the “Play to” feature will negotiate with the media renderer device to ensure that the audio format streamed from the server can be handled. If it can’t, it will try and have the server transcode it to a format that can be understood by the renderer.
    • In Windows 8, the “Play to” feature doesn’t bother to find out whether the device can cope with the streamed format, it just sends it, and the consequences be damned…

    Here are the details:

    First, let me recapitulate some of the terms and technology specification used by Microsoft in its implementation of “Play to”. These come from the Digital Living Networking Alliance, or DLNA for short. Their specification defines how a variety of different types of digital devices can connect and share information. I’ve summarised the devices used in “Play to” in the following table:

    Device Class What it Does Examples
    Digital Media Server (DMS) Stores content and makes it available to networked digital media players (DMP) and digital media renderers (DMR). PCs, Windows Home Server, and network attached storage (NAS) devices
    Digital Media Player (DMP) Finds content on digital media servers (DMS) and provides playback and rendering capabilities. TVs, stereos and home theaters, wireless monitors and game consoles. Windows Media Player also has a DMP capability
    Digital Media Renderer (DMR) These devices play content received from a digital media controller (DMC), which will find content from a digital media server (DMS). TVs, audio/video receivers, video displays and remote speakers for music
    Digital Media Controller (DMC) These devices find content on digital media servers (DMS) and play it on digital media renderers (DMR). Internet tablets, Wi-Fi® enabled digital cameras and the “Play to” function in Windows 7 and Windows 8.

    Table 1: Information drawn from the DLNA web site.

    Windows 7 and Windows 8 implement a number of these classes as shown here:

    Device Class Windows Implementations
    Digital Media Server (DMS) When media streaming is enabled, Windows acts as a DMS.
    Digital Media Player (DMP) Windows Media Player and Windows Media Center act as a DMP when browsing shared media libraries
    Digital Media Renderer (DMR) Windows Media Player acts as a DMR when configured to allow remote control of the Player.
    Digital Media Controller (DMC) The “Play To” feature from Windows Media Player (and the Windows Explorer in Windows 8) launches a DMC to control the media playback experience

    Table 2: Information drawn from the Engineering Windows 7 Blog.

    At its simplest, just two devices can be involved: a Server and a Player. These can even be running on the same physical device, as in the case where your Windows Media Player on your Desktop PC is streaming music or video stored on the PC itself. The next step up is where the server and player are on separate physical devices. Two typical scenarios are shown in figure 1:

    WMP Scenarios

    Figure 1: Typical scenarios of simple case of DMP devices accessing DMS devices.

    I’ve used the Denon AVR-3808 as an example, since this is what I have in my home network. My DMS is a headless (no monitor, keyboard or mouse) home-built PC running the Windows Home Server 2011 operating system.

    In my particular case, both the two scenarios shown above will work, that is, the DMS that is part of WHS 2011 will stream audio to other PCs in the home network, and to the Denon AVR3808.

    Now, this next bit is important, I’ll return to it later: Under the covers, there’s actually some negotiation of streaming formats going on.

    This is because I have stored all my music files on the WHS 2011 in Windows Media Audio Lossless (WMAL) format. This presents no problems for the PCs, since the Windows Media Players installed on them can handle WMAL. But while the Denon can handle standard Windows Media Audio, it can’t handle the Lossless variant. So when I use the Denon to browse my music library on the server and select a track to play, the DMS in WHS 2011 sees that the Denon can’t handle WMAL and transcodes the stream into a format that the Denon can handle on the fly – it transcodes it into a PCM stream, which the Denon can deal with.

    Now let’s look at scenarios are where there are three devices linked together: a Digital Media Server, a Digital Media Controller, and a Digital Media Renderer.

    WMP Scenarios 2

    Figure 2: Typical scenarios of a three device link (DMS-DMC-DMR).

    In my case, all flavours of scenario 3 will work. That is, I can stream from my Windows Home Server using the “Play To” feature in either Windows 7 or Windows 8 Release Preview, and push the stream to PCs that are running Windows Media Player in Windows 7 or the Windows 8 Release Preview.

    But while scenario 4 (streaming to the Denon) works with the “Play to” of Windows 7, it does not always work with the “Play to” of Windows 8 Release Preview.

    The following table shows which formats work and which don’t, when using scenario 4:

    Format Windows 7 Windows 8
    MP3 Yes Yes
    Windows Media Audio Yes Yes
    Windows Media Audio Lossless Yes No

    Table 3: Audio formats used with “Play to” features in Windows 7 and Windows 8

    Now take a look at a table showing which formats are supported by the Denon AVR-3808:

    Format Supported by the Denon
    MP3 Yes
    Windows Media Audio Yes
    Windows Media Audio Lossless No
    FLAC Yes

    Table 4: Audio formats supported by the Denon AVR-3808

    My very strong suspicion, therefore, is that the Windows 8 “Play to” does not negotiate a playable format with the DMR of the the Denon, it simply sends the source format regardless. The Denon’s display panel has indicators  (MP3, WMA, PCM) that show the audio formats being received.  Let’s take another look at Table 3, but this time, show the state of the Denon indicators:

    Format Windows 7 Windows 8
    MP3 MP3 MP3
    Windows Media Audio WMA WMA
    Windows Media Audio (Lossless) MP3

    Table 5: Denon front panel indicators state

    You can see that, for Windows 7, the WMA Lossless format of the source media has been transcoded into an MP3 stream so that the Denon can deal with it. In scenario 2 (the Denon communicating directly with the Windows Home Server), the PCM indicator lights, showing that the negotiation with WHS 2011 has resulted in an alternative format being used.

    If the Windows 8 “Play to” is not carrying out any negotiation, as I think is happening in scenario 4, then of course the Denon will respond with an error – it cannot play native Windows Media Audio Lossless format.

    I note that Microsoft states that:

    Improved device experience: Metro style apps work only with Windows certified Play To receivers. These devices are validated to support modern media formats, are DLNA standards-compliant, and have great performance (including the updated Xbox 360 available later this year). The desktop experience first introduced in Windows 7 has been added to the Explorer Ribbon and will continue to support all DLNA DMR devices.

    Fine words, except that Microsoft are being economical with the truth at the moment. “The desktop experience first introduced in Windows 7” does not “continue to support all DLNA DMR devices”.

    It’s broken.

    31 responses to “Windows 8 “Play to” Revisited”

    1. xpclient Avatar
      xpclient

      It’s broken and what a shame that despite notifying them about it, they say “This is by design”. Many features are broken. I expect a disaster worse than Vista. Microsoft need to re-visit their own definitions of “improved” and “no compromise experience”.

    2. Lili_acul Avatar
      Lili_acul

      I have a Denon 3808CI that was working good with HP Ex type media servers. I have now and HP N40L with WHS 2011. I can see from Denon the server, it shows Music and PlayList. If I select Music, Denon will lockup. I need to power cycle to recover. If I go to the Playlist, it will show F: the letter fo the HDD and then Serverfolders and then Music. Only some of the music folders will show up. I tested also with a Sony streamer , same thing nothing will be shown in the music folder. I feel there is something wrong with the server setup/ database. I do have in the server settings Media server is on. Please help.

      1. Geoff Coupe Avatar

        Lili_acul, can you play your music stored on your WHS 2011 using a Windows Media Player running on one of your client PCs? That would be the first thing to check, I think.

    3. Scary Biscuits Avatar
      Scary Biscuits

      Not being fully compatible with a five year old Denon amp hardly marks Windows 8 as ‘broken’. You could equally blame Denon by selling a high-end amp but not supporting high-end music formats which were around at the time (2007) and thus crippling their DNLA device.
      Microsoft adding on-the-fly conversion like this is a good example of Microsoft bending over backwards to support the quirky decisions of third-parties. However, they shouldn’t be expected to do this indefinitely for a very small number of people particularly now as bulky code or extra processing carries a higher cost on portable devices.
      The obvious work-around is to manually convert lossless files in your collection to lossy ones, which has the added advantage of saving you electricity by doing it only once. The other obvious work-around is to buy a new amp and pressure Denon (who make excellent and arguably the best home power amplifiers) to give similar attention to detail to the user-interface and interoperability side. Their latest releases are better but still woeful compared with a Windows Media Centre of 2005.

      1. Geoff Coupe Avatar

        Sorry, Scary Biscuits, but I disagree with your argument. The point is that it works under Windows 7, but it doesn’t work under the Windows 8 Release Preview.

        Actually, I believe that Microsoft have acknowledged the issue, and fixed it for RTM. I will find out for myself on October 26th when I will upgrade my main PC to Windows 8.

        And as for the “on-the-fly conversion” – that’s something that all DLNA DMS devices are supposed to make provision for – it ain’t “Microsoft bending over backwards to support the quirky decisions of third parties”. And we are talking about this transcoding being done on the SERVER, not the player device, so it’s irrelevant for power consumption on the player.

        I made a deliberate decision to store my files on my server in lossless format, for the benefits of maximum quality. I chose WMA Lossless simply because my computing environment is Windows-based. The alternative would have been FLAC (which the Denon supports natively). In retrospect, FLAC might have been the wiser choice, but it would have meant almost certainly battling with Microsoft’s failure to support it, and having to search out third-party plug-ins for Microsoft applications.

        Denon’s latest range of amplifiers still do NOT support WMA Lossless, so buying a new amp, even if I wished to do that, would be pointless.

        1. Scary Biscuits Avatar
          Scary Biscuits

          You may well be right.
          Franly, I’d be happy with a DNLA service that worked. I’ve had both a Denon 1611 and and 1912 and neither has worked reliably with DNLA. Sometimes it does, sometimes it doesn’t. Sometimes fixes like starting and stopping the WMP Network Sharing Service and UPnP Windsor services or rebooting work. Sometimes they don’t. Either way the Windows software was clearly written in a tearing hurry with no trouble taken to debug or to provide useful error messages.
          Airplay on Windows 7, by contrast, works all the time which is really annoying because I hate being trapped in Apple’s walled garden.

          1. Geoff Coupe Avatar

            In the early days of my ownership of my Denon 3808, I had a lot of problems with the network interface and streaming. These were fixed by a firmware update from Denon back in 2009. Since then, the Denon has performed very well in a variety of DLNA scenarios. Up until the Windows 8 “Play to” issue crawled out, I had been very satisfied.

    4. Mel Holmes Avatar
      Mel Holmes

      I was happily “playing to” a Sony Bravia Internet TV on my home network in Windows 7. I have “upgraded to Windows 8 and now cannot “play to this device”. I have effectively DOWNGRADED my home network by installing windows 8! VERY ANGRY

      1. Geoff Coupe Avatar

        Mel,

        I suggest that you report this in the Microsoft forum for Windows 8: http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/windows_8
        It’s clearly something that Microsoft should be told about.

        1. Mel Holmes Avatar
          Mel Holmes

          You’re right – will do.

    5. Jeff Jeffers Avatar
      Jeff Jeffers

      Microsoft shit bags. My Bravio no longer plays video.

    6. KantBZH Avatar
      KantBZH

      Hi,
      The only answer I got from Microsoft is that my 1912 is outdated and it’s not their problem.
      In French : http://answers.microsoft.com/fr-fr/windows/forum/windows_8-pictures/scandaleuse-%C3%A9volution-de-play-to/511b2f39-6010-40ba-a4ee-9352a3bf40fc
      BUT : old Denon Devices are listed as ” Windows 8 certified” (ex : 3311)! So I don’t understand their standards…

    7. William Turner Avatar
      William Turner

      I have searched and searched the internet and I am shocked that this tiny little blog is really all there is on the subject! It’s annoying me to no end that things will work in “desktop mode” but not with the rest of Windows. I purchased a Sony wifi speaker that was admittedly end of line when I bought it but it filled the need I had and was really making me happy. Then I upgraded to Windows 8 and wanted to try out the “Music” app. Its essentially worthless to me unless I want to play it out the tiny pc speakers. Finding out this whole mess is “by design” is baffling.

    8. Brian Darroch Avatar
      Brian Darroch

      Even though the Video and Music app doesn’t allow me to PlayTo my uncertitied Panasonic Veira TV. I can still do it by opening file explorer and right clicking on the file name and select PlayTo. It’s a pain but at least it works

    9. Mike Avatar
      Mike

      Your bargepole comment re the Surface is wrong. As a previous commenter noted, even though Windows RT doesn’t have a desktop media player, the desktop file explorer now has Play To functionality. On top of that the file explorer will now allow you to browse a DLNA library as if it were just another drive.

      1. Geoff Coupe Avatar

        Mike, while I agree that the Windows Explorer has “Play to” functionality, and it will work with the Denon, it is a pretty poor substitute for a dedicated Music Library application such as Windows Media Player.

        And the fact remains that (1) Windows Media Player does not run on the Surface RT, and (2) the dedicated Music Library application supplied by Microsoft – Xbox Music – does not “Play to” the Denon. Nor do any other Modern UI Apps that I’ve looked at.

        I’m still not touching a Surface RT with a bargepole. At the moment I’m vacillating between a Lenovo Thinkpad 2 or the Surface Pro. However, it remains to be seen whether Microsoft will bother to release any Surface models into the Dutch market.

    10. Mike Avatar
      Mike

      Have you seen the article at winsupersite?
      http://winsupersite.com/windows-8/sad-tale-play-and-windows-8

      Maybe this can help…

      1. Geoff Coupe Avatar

        Hah! Thanks Mike, for the heads up. I would have seen it later today when I do my daily round of reading the blogs, but the early warning is appreciated.

        Good to see that Mr. Thurrott is banging the same drum. He is able to make far more noise than I, but I think that Microsoft will remain deaf to the sounds.

    11. […] written before about the issues I’ve had with the “Play to” function in Windows 8. Paul Thurrott wrote an article yesterday: The Sad Tale of Play To and Windows 8, with much the […]

    12. tema Avatar
      tema

      Thanks for a very nice info on this subject.
      I currently have Denon AVR-3313 and Play-to from w8 desktop works nicely.
      However when I folowed the instructions in the registry hack page about turning your uncertified DLNA renderer into certified ones I’m not able to do that. The device remain uncertified.
      There is one difference in my case compared to the instructions:
      – My Denon is not visible in the library section on Explorer
      – I’m locating the manufacturer and Model from Control panel Devices and Printers section
      Is there a more reliable way to identify the correct spelling of the Manufacturer and Device model ?

      Again thanks a lot for this nice information

      Tema

      1. Geoff Coupe Avatar

        Tema – you need to open the Properties page of the Denon from the “Network” section of Windows Explorer. If your Denon is switched on, then you should see it showing as a “Network Audio” device. Open the Properties page of that device, and you’ll see the correct names to use in the Registry key.

        For some reason, the Properties page of the device displayed in the Devices and Printers page gives different names, that don’t work, as you have found.

    13. leon Avatar
      leon

      Even easier with windows RT 8.1 on my surface. Got my denon 3808 working flawlessly!!

    14. darkmoon Avatar

      I have the same problem after 8.1 came in the picture, before in windows 8 the play to feature worked flawlessly with my lg smart tv even it was a non-windows certified device . ..so any luck in finding a solution ?

        1. darkmoon Avatar

          nah still cannot find my play to device

          1. Geoff Coupe Avatar

            Is it showing in the PC & Devices section of the Modern UI PC Settings? And you did a reboot after making the changes to the Registry?

            1. darkmoon Avatar

              nope it is not showing up in that section and i did do a reboot..mayaybe i should have chosen 64 bit for the key?

              1. Geoff Coupe Avatar

                No – it’s definitely a Dword, as Barb writes in the wiki. I suggest that you double-check the changes you’ve made in the Registry (and that you have taken out any earlier changes to add specific DLNA devices). You should certainly be seeing your device appear on that screen (when it’s switched on, and reachable over your network – it may not be shown unless this is the case).

    15. darkmoon Avatar

      wow your more responsive than the guys at the microsoft support forum lol but its definitely windows software issue because some third party i tried recognize my play to feature without any fuzz…so i will try your fix. whew i found your blog after searching days for a solution.

    16. Nils Hallberg Avatar
      Nils Hallberg

      Darkmoon:
      I seem to have exactly the same problem as you do. The play to function on the desktop worked flawlessly with my LG TV until i upgraded to win 8.1. Now I can’t find the TV in the metro settings device list.
      The TV is listed under the “media devices” in the network section of the file explorer but it is not identified as a play device.

    Leave a comment

  • Onward Christian Soldiers…

    I see that the Church of England has now formally submitted its response to the UK Government’s consultation on same-sex marriage. They’re against it. If I were a Christian, like Giles Fraser, then, like him, I would be both ashamed and angry at the Church’s stance. But I’m not a Christian, so I’m simply disgusted and appalled at their continuing bigotry, and not in the least little bit surprised.

    The summary of the C of E’s 13-page submission makes interesting reading. They’re against it because:

    Such a move would alter the intrinsic nature of marriage as the union of a man and a woman, as enshrined in human institutions throughout history.

    Marriage, as they very well know, has taken on many forms in human institutions throughout history. There is nothing “intrinsic” about it. And if we’re talking about human institutions here, then your God can damn well keep his nose out of my marriage, thank you very much.

    Marriage benefits society in many ways, not only by promoting mutuality and fidelity, but also by acknowledging an underlying biological complementarity which, for many, includes the possibility of procreation.

    I totally agree with the first part of this statement, marriage does benefit society in many ways, including promoting mutuality and fidelity. However, after stating this, the C of E wants to erect “keep-out” signs to prevent this being available to same-sex couples. How very charitable of them. And as for “an underlying biological complementarity” it’s certainly easier if a married couple already possess the right bits, but if they don’t, it still doesn’t rule out the possibility of procreation and raising children in a loving family.

    We have supported various legal changes in recent years to remove unjustified discrimination and create greater legal rights for same sex couples and we welcome that fact that previous legal and material inequities between heterosexual and same-sex partnerships have now been satisfactorily addressed. To change the nature of marriage for everyone will be divisive and deliver no obvious legal gains given the rights already conferred by civil partnerships. We also believe that imposing for essentially ideological reasons a new meaning on a term as familiar and fundamental as marriage would be deeply unwise.

    To claim that the CofE has “supported various legal changes in recent years to remove unjustified discrimination and create greater legal rights for same sex couples” is a downright lie. As Giles Fraser writes:

    In the main House of Lords debate in June 2004 the majority spoke against it and voted six to one in favour of a wrecking amendment. The leadership of the C of E will do anything to keep gay people out of the church. It uses the sickly language of welcome but won’t let gay priests (even celibate ones) become bishops and is prepared to cut the Church of England off from the Episcopal church in the US because they do. At every turn, the Church of England treats gay people as an unwanted headache.

    As I say, I am not surprised that the C of E objects to the proposals, they’ve cherry-picked the bits of scriptures to form the basis of their objections. The bible also condones slavery and the stoning of adulterers, but somehow society (at least in the West) has managed to move on from that. But what I do object to is their insistence that their beliefs should apply to the rest of us:

    In common with almost all other Churches, the Church of England holds, as a matter of doctrine and derived from the teaching of Christ himself, that marriage in general – and not just the marriage of Christians – is, in its nature, a lifelong union of one man with one woman.

    from page 2 of the submission, my emphasis in bold. As I said above, their god can keep his nose out of my marriage.

    Then there’s the usual cry of “allowing same-sex marriages will dilute traditional marriage”. Section 13, page 4, of their submission (bold in the original):

    We believe that redefining marriage to include same-sex relationships will entail a dilution in the meaning of marriage for everyone by excluding the fundamental complementarity of men and women from the social and legal definition of marriage.

    You know, it’s ironic. Here in The Netherlands, civil partnership was introduced for same-sex couples back in 1998, and then in 2001 full civil marriage for same-sex couples became available. There’s been no “dilution in the meaning of marriage for everyone” at all. There are still church weddings for those who believe, but importantly, every couple first goes through a secular civil marriage ceremony, performed by a civil servant authorised to conduct weddings. This has long been the case – certainly before same-sex marriage became available. And there have been no challenges to the European Court of Human Rights to force Dutch Churches to marry same-sex couples, as the C of E apparently fears will happen in the UK.

    The news of the C of E’s submission has appeared on the 12th June 2012. By coincidence, this is what we consider as our 14th Wedding Anniversary. Martin and I had a civil partnership ceremony on the 12th June 1998. In 2003, we had this upgraded to a full civil marriage. The C of E’s continuing scaremongering on this issue of same-sex marriage is just another example of how, to quote Christopher Hitchens, religion poisons everything.

    3 responses to “Onward Christian Soldiers…”

    1. Simon Avatar
      Simon

      This brought a wry smile to my face:

    2. […] earnestly entreated the UK government to forbid the possibility of same-sex marriage, for a number of dubious reasons, it is now horrified when the UK government has responded by effectively saying: OK, you don’t […]

    Leave a comment

  • A Boerenbruiloft

    Boerenbruiloft is the Dutch word for a farmers’ wedding. Here in the Achterhoek area of the Netherlands, the sense of tradition is still very strong, so last Saturday I was able to be an onlooker of a boerenbruiloft. It was actually all a bit of play-acting from the members of the local horse and carriage club to celebrate thirty years of their existence. So they set out to show how a happy couple would get married with all the trappings and traditions that would accompany a typical farmer’s wedding in the first couple of decades of the 20th century.

    That would involve the bridegroom travelling in horse and carriage to the house of the bride’s parents:

    20120609-1222-08 

    Once the bride was collected, the whole entourage (bride and bridegroom, parents, witnesses, and guests) would set off for the wedding ceremony:

    20120609-1237-51

    20120609-1240-25

    20120609-1240-32

    20120609-1240-46

    20120609-1240-50

    20120609-1241-04

    20120609-1241-14

    This being the Netherlands of the 21st century, Health and Safety issues seemed to also be creeping in…

    20120609-1242-29

    The “marriage” ceremony itself was conducted in the Hofshuus in Varsseveld, an old farmhouse that dates from the 17th century.

    Here in the Netherlands, marriage is a secular institution, with marriages conducted by a civil servant (ambtenaar) who has the right to perform marriages (an ambtenaar van de burgerlijke stand). So the “ambtenaar” formally asked the parents and the couple if they assented to the marriage, and then invited the couple to exchange rings.

    20120609-1353-00

    Following the “marriage” ceremony, we had a re-enactment of another tradition that was once common in the Actherhoek: the presentation of a cow (the bruidskoe) to the bride by the bride’s father:

    20120609-1408-25

    The people living in the neighbourhood (the buurt) of the new couple would also traditionally present the couple with a gift to welcome them into the buurt. Very often this would be a clock for the farmhouse:

    20120609-1410-17

    There would then be a communal meal for everyone to celebrate the marriage:

    20120609-1445-50

    The forms may change, but the essentials remain the same, from the time of Brueghel the Elder to today…

    Following the meal, the bride and bridegroom would travel back to their new home, but along the way, the buurt would stretch a rope across the road, and demand payment of a toll.

    20120609-1534-16

    That would take the form of a glass of strong drink offered by the couple to the buurt. Note that the glasses have no foot – you’re meant to down the drink in one go…

    20120609-1535-59(001)

    Leave a comment